Comparação pressórica e visual entre a facoesclerectomia profunda não penetrante e a facotrabeculectomia 245 PIO em todas as visitas <strong>de</strong> pós-operatório; a redução média da PIO foi <strong>de</strong> 8,63 mmHg (dp 8,55) com 12 meses <strong>de</strong> seguimento correspon<strong>de</strong>ndo a uma redução <strong>de</strong> 32,78%. (1) O grupo da FACOEPNP apresentou AV LogMar pré-média <strong>de</strong> 0,80 (dp 0,60) evoluindo para AV LogMar pós-média <strong>de</strong> 0,35 (dp 0,61) com variação média da AV LogMar <strong>de</strong> -0,45 (dp 0,51) com p
246 Almodin J, Pedroso EC, Cvintal T, Almodin F REFERÊNCIAS 1. Muñoz Negrete FJ, Rebolleda G, Noval S. [Non-penetrating <strong>de</strong>ep sclerectomy combined with phacoemulsification. Results and complications]. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2003;78(9):499-506. Spanish. 2. Lyle WA, Jin JC. Comparision of a 3- and 6-mm incision in combined phacoemulsification and trabeculectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 1991; 111(2):189-96. 3. Lachkar Y, Hamard P. Nonpenetrating filtering surgery. Curr Opin Ophtalmol. 2002; 13(2):110-5. 4. Funnell CL, Clowes M, Anand N. Combined cataract and glaucoma surgery with mimomycin C: phacoemulsificationtrabeculectomy compared to phacoemulsification-<strong>de</strong>ep sclerectomy. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 694-698. 5. Moreno-López M, Pérez-Alvarez MJ. [Short- and mediumterm intraocular pressure lowering effects of combined phacoemulsification and non-penetrating <strong>de</strong>ep sclerectomy without scleral implant or antifibrotics]. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2006;81(2):93-100. Spanish. 6. Mermoud A, Karlen ME, Schny<strong>de</strong>r CC, Sickenberg M, Chiou AG, Hédiguer SE, et al. Nd: Yag goniopuncture after <strong>de</strong>ep sclerectomy with collagen implant. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1999; 30(2):120-5. 7. Lama PJ, Fechtner RD. Antifibrotics and wound healing in glaucoma surgery. Surv Ophthalmol. 2003; 48(3):314-46. 8. Mandia Junior C, Kasahara N, Seixas FS, Paolera MD, Almeida GV, Cohen R. Comparacão a longo prazo entre a facectomia extracapsular combinada à trabeculectomia e à facotrabeculectomia. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2002; 65(6):641-4. 9. Anand S, Anand N. Combined phacoemulsification and <strong>de</strong>ep sclerectomy (PDS) with intraoperative mitomycin C (MMC) augmentation. Eye (Lond). 2008; 22(8):1040-9. 10. Gianoli F, Mermoud A. [Cataract-glaucoma combined surgery: comparison between phacoemulsification combined with <strong>de</strong>ep sclerectomy, or trabeculectomy]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1997;210(5):256-60. French. 11. Lüke C, Dietlein TS, Lüke M, Konen W, Krieglstein GK. Phacotrabeculotomy combined with <strong>de</strong>ep sclerectomy, a new technique in combined cataract and glaucoma surgery: complication profile. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85(2):143-8. 12. Jurowski P, Gos R. [Effectiveness of the combined surgical treatment for glaucoma and cataract]. Klin Oczna. 2005;107(4-6):212-6. Polish. 13. Lüke C, Dietlein TS, Lüke M, Konen W, Krieglstein GK. A prospective trial of phaco-trabeculectomy combined with <strong>de</strong>ep sclerectomy versus phaco-trabeculectomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008;246(8):1163-8. 14. Yuen NS. Early results of modified nonpenetrating <strong>de</strong>ep sclerectomy and phacoemulsification in the treatment of open angle glaucoma and cataract. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2009;19(1):72- 9. 15. Yuen NS, Chan OC, Hui SP, Ching RH. Combined phacoemulsification and nonpenetrating <strong>de</strong>ep sclerectomy in the treatment of chronic angle-closure glaucoma with cataract. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007;17(2):208-15. 16. Gianoli F, Schny<strong>de</strong>r CC, Bovey E, Mermoud A. Combined surgery for cataract and glaucoma: phacoemulsification and <strong>de</strong>ep sclerectomy compared with phacoemulsification and trabeculectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25(3):340-6. En<strong>de</strong>reço para correspondência: Juliana Almodin Rua Xavier Curado, <strong>nº</strong> 351 - apto 131 - Ipiranga CEP 04210-100 - São Paulo (SP), Brasil E-mail: Juliana_almodin@hotmail.com Rev Bras Oftalmol. <strong>2010</strong>; 69 (4): 241-6
- Page 1 and 2: Oftalmomiíase vol. 69 - nº 4 - Ju
- Page 3 and 4: 212 Revista Brasileira de Oftalmolo
- Page 5 and 6: 214 236 Avaliação econômica das
- Page 7 and 8: 216 Senescência ocular e o século
- Page 9 and 10: 218 Silverio J, Ferreira PDV, Pauli
- Page 11 and 12: 220 Silverio J, Ferreira PDV, Pauli
- Page 13 and 14: 222 ARTIGO ORIGINAL Atendimento oft
- Page 15 and 16: 224 Campos Júnior JC Figura 1: Dis
- Page 17 and 18: 226 ARTIGO ORIGINAL Espessura centr
- Page 19 and 20: 228 Santos WEM, Siqueira Junior JJ,
- Page 21 and 22: 230 ARTIGO ORIGINAL Desempenho visu
- Page 23 and 24: 232 Akaishi L, Messias CB, Tzelikis
- Page 25 and 26: 234 Akaishi L, Messias CB, Tzelikis
- Page 27 and 28: 236 ARTIGO ORIGINAL Avaliação eco
- Page 29 and 30: 238 Guedes RAP, Guedes VMP, Borges
- Page 31 and 32: 240 Guedes RAP, Guedes VMP, Borges
- Page 33 and 34: 242 Almodin J, Pedroso EC, Cvintal
- Page 35: 244 Almodin J, Pedroso EC, Cvintal
- Page 39 and 40: 248 Freitas JAH, Abreu HFH, Mariste
- Page 41 and 42: 250 Freitas JAH, Abreu HFH, Mariste
- Page 43 and 44: 252 ARTIGO ORIGINAL Vitrectomia tra
- Page 45 and 46: 254 Akaishi L, Canamary F, Tzelikis
- Page 47 and 48: 256 Akaishi L, Canamary F, Tzelikis
- Page 49 and 50: 258 Akaishi L, Canamary F, Tzelikis
- Page 51 and 52: 260 Cury D, Boa-Sorte N, Lyra IM, Z
- Page 53 and 54: 262 Cury D, Boa-Sorte N, Lyra IM, Z
- Page 55 and 56: 264 RELATO DE CASO Oftalmomiíase p
- Page 57 and 58: 266 Martins Junior JC, Keim FS, Iar
- Page 59 and 60: 268 Martins Junior JC, Keim FS, Iar
- Page 61 and 62: 270 Silveira CG, Oliveira PRP, Silv
- Page 63 and 64: 272 Silveira CG, Oliveira PRP, Silv
- Page 65 and 66: 274 Silveira CG, Oliveira PRP, Silv
- Page 67 and 68: 276 Instruções aos autores A Revi
- Page 69: 278 Revista Brasileira de Oftalmolo