03.06.2016 Views

Tomorrow's Railway and Climate Change Adaptation Final Report

2016-05-T1009-final-report

2016-05-T1009-final-report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.8.6 Data gathering<br />

The specific weather <strong>and</strong> other circumstances leading to erosion of performance did not<br />

appear to us to be universally recorded by Network Rail. A requirement to record these<br />

would lead to a better underst<strong>and</strong>ing of how the assets perform, <strong>and</strong> therefore better<br />

decision making on how performance might be improved.<br />

5.9 Task 1E Economics of climate change adaptation,<br />

Western Route case study<br />

The following recommendations are made based on the case study work:<br />

Dealing with uncertainty<br />

• Combine hydrological models with an approach that can establish which assets will be<br />

vulnerable to flood hazard, <strong>and</strong> can estimate the likely extent of the damage<br />

• Update the underlying assumptions on hazard, vulnerability <strong>and</strong> risk to service by<br />

formation of a risk chain, with a vulnerability metric such as journey availability.<br />

Monitor the impacts of the assets on the vulnerability metric.<br />

Extending the boundary of the analysis<br />

• Use a full cost-benefit analysis that extends the nature of impacts addressed where<br />

there is an anticipated high societal impact. Consider using a multi-modal model (<strong>and</strong><br />

a system of systems approach, including the impact on freight) for significant<br />

resilience investments. It is also important to address problems <strong>and</strong> solutions over a<br />

wide geographical area. Such appraisals, if carried out quickly, could feed into the<br />

current work on Network Rail’s CP6 investment plan<br />

Applying different measures<br />

• Keep better records from previous events including damage to rail assets, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

parameters of the weather <strong>and</strong> the associated weather event that has caused that<br />

damage. Start clearly defining asset groups (track, power, communications,<br />

structures, staff, rolling stock <strong>and</strong> others) in terms of their spatial extent (in three<br />

dimensions) <strong>and</strong> connectivity, as well as vulnerability to specific hazards. This could be<br />

done based on the T1009 Phase 1 information (Task 1B).<br />

5.10 Task 2A Overseas weather <strong>and</strong> railways, temporal<br />

<strong>and</strong> spatial characteristics of future climate, <strong>and</strong> Task<br />

2B Overseas weather <strong>and</strong> railways, identification of<br />

similar climates<br />

Task 2A <strong>and</strong> Task 2B recommend that the following nine countries be considered as<br />

potential overseas analogies for the UK rail system. In Europe: Austria, Belgium,<br />

Denmark, France, Germany, Italy <strong>and</strong> the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> outside Europe, Morocco<br />

101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!