11.08.2012 Aufrufe

ARCHITECTURE!

ARCHITECTURE!

ARCHITECTURE!

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.

YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.

VORARLBERG<br />

“The architectural climate in Vorarlberg is like the theatre climate in Vienna: it embraces every class of society,” and Roland Gnaiger’s TV<br />

series Plus or Minus has clearly helped. Above: apartment building by Gnaiger and Udo Mössler in Dornbirn / „Das Architekturklima in<br />

Vorarlberg ist wie das Theaterklima in Wien: Es erfasst alle Bevölkerungsschichten.“ Mit seiner TV-Sendung „Plus oder<br />

Minus“ trug Roland Gnaiger wesentlich dazu bei. Appartementhaus in Dornbirn von Roland Gnaiger und Udo Mössler (o.)<br />

80<br />

“In the early 1980s the head of the<br />

Austrian Broadcasting Corporation at<br />

the time, Gerd Bacher, decided architecture<br />

was an interesting topic for<br />

television. Just after 7 p.m. – in prime<br />

time – he gave every province the<br />

opportunity to present two projects,<br />

one positive and one negative, in a<br />

programme called Plus or Minus. I was<br />

responsible for Vorarlberg and soon had<br />

an audience of real fans. Sometimes<br />

I got balled out on the street for having<br />

criticised a hotel building.<br />

But the people of Vorarlberg were<br />

interested in the topic long before the<br />

programme. In the mid-1960s an<br />

interested group of young architects,<br />

teachers, graphic designers and artists<br />

began working on alternatives to the<br />

existing style of construction. Working<br />

together, they set austere cubes into the<br />

landscape with a high degree of<br />

minimalism but with a maximum of<br />

ecological quality. The group defined<br />

architecture not as art but as service.<br />

The houses they built cost no more than<br />

a small condominium. That really<br />

appealed to the people of Vorarlberg,<br />

who tend to be economical and a bit<br />

more prosaic than the other Austrians.<br />

In any case, architecture has a much<br />

higher reputation here than it does in<br />

the other Austrian provinces. It may be<br />

that I contributed to this understanding<br />

with my Plus or Minus series. In the<br />

seven or eight years the programme<br />

was shown, I was on air 152 times.”<br />

pay was something they could live with in a region where everybody<br />

knows everybody else anyway: they can’t call themselves<br />

“architects”.<br />

But professional titles were not particularly relevant within<br />

the context. Because the nucleus of the Baukünstler was a<br />

small network of rebellious planners, artists, graphic designers<br />

and teachers, who in the 1960s began exploring alternatives to<br />

the local provinciality of the post-war era. “One of the central<br />

figures associated with this group was a teacher at the College<br />

of Education in Feldkirch, Franz Bertel”, says architectural critic<br />

Otto Kapfinger, who has devoted several books to the Vorarlberg<br />

phenomenon. Bertel was one of the founders of the<br />

satirical cabaret group Wühlmäuse, a close friend of the revolutionary<br />

architect Hans Purin and the mentor of numerous<br />

young talents, whom he encouraged to study architecture.<br />

Many of them did, either in Innsbruck or Vienna, and then<br />

returned to Vorarlberg.<br />

Hans Purin was the architectural mastermind of the group<br />

and was one of the first who dared to replace the dominant,<br />

classic Rhine Valley style – simple houses with exterior walls<br />

clad in wooden shingles – with wooden framed buildings of<br />

Japanese severity. “At the time these buildings were derided<br />

as matchbox or shoebox designs”, says Kapfinger, “because<br />

Purin used a flat instead of a pitched roof.”<br />

ROLAND GNAIGER,<br />

THE AMBASSADOR / DER BOTSCHAFTER<br />

„Anfang der 80er-Jahre hatte der damalige ORF-Intendant Gerd<br />

Bacher die Idee, Architektur zu einem Thema fürs Fernsehen zu<br />

machen. Zur besten Zeit, also kurz nach 19.00 Uhr, räumte er<br />

jedem Bundesland die Möglichkeit ein, in ,Plus oder Minus‘<br />

jeweils zwei Projekte zu präsentieren. Ein positives und ein negatives<br />

Beispiel. Ich war für Vorarlberg zuständig und hatte binnen<br />

kurzer Zeit eine richtige Fangemeinde. Manchmal wurde ich<br />

beschimpft auf der Straße, etwa weil ich ein Hotel verrissen hatte.<br />

Diese Anteilnahme der Vorarlberger am Thema existierte aber<br />

schon vor der Sendung. Mitte der 60er-Jahre begann eine<br />

interessante Szene von jungen Architekten, Lehrern, Graphikern,<br />

Künstlern, der bestehenden Bauweise etwas entgegenzusetzen.<br />

Gemeinsam setzten sie knallhart Kuben in die Landschaft, die mit<br />

einem Höchstmaß an Minimierung versehen, aber mit maximaler<br />

ökonomischer Qualität ausgestattet waren. Diese Gruppe<br />

definierte Architektur als Dienstleistung und nicht als Kunst.<br />

Denn die Fertigung der Häuser kostete damals genauso viel wie<br />

eine 75-Quadratmeter-Eigentumswohnung. Das ist den Vorarlbergern,<br />

die von ihrer Mentalität her ökonomisch ausgerichtet<br />

und ein bisschen prosaischer sind als der Rest Österreichs, sehr<br />

entgegengekommen. Vom Image her genießt der Architekt<br />

hier jedenfalls einen wesentlich besseren Ruf als in anderen<br />

Bundesländern. Es kann schon sein, dass ich mit ,Plus oder<br />

Minus‘ zu diesem höheren Verständnis beigetragen habe.<br />

In den sieben, acht Jahren, in denen die Sendung lief, war<br />

ich 152 Mal on air.“<br />

The irresistible attraction of these rather plain buildings: they cost no<br />

more than a small condominium and could be built in only a few days. “The<br />

other advantage is that the owner can build a lot of the house himself.<br />

Anybody can drive a nail into wood”, explains architect Hermann Kaufmann,<br />

one of the pioneers of wood construction in Vorarlberg, even though he’s<br />

already part of Purin’s successor generation. “Wood”, says Kaufmann,<br />

“is the best material for do-it-yourselfers. You can drive over on your lunch<br />

break or after work and nail down a couple of boards.”<br />

And there was another convincing argument for a province of people<br />

known for their thrift: wood is cheap because it comes from the local forests,<br />

and the work is cheap because the owners can do much of it themselves.<br />

Even the heating bills are lower, because wood provides wonderful insulation.<br />

“The argument of economy finally overcame every resistance”, says<br />

Kapfinger with a smile. “The majority ended up adopting a minority viewpoint<br />

because it was so reasonable.”<br />

Now a new generation in Vorarlberg, like the brothers Bernhard and<br />

Stefan Marte and the architectural partners Helmut Dietrich and Much<br />

Untertrifaller, are working to optimise the older forms. And there are ambassadors<br />

eager to share their treasures and carry them in the form of international<br />

commissions and foreign teaching positions into the wider world.<br />

Baumschlager and Eberle have meanwhile received commissions from<br />

Munich, Berlin, Beijing and Zurich. Dietmar Eberle teaches at the Institute<br />

of Technology in Zurich. Hermann Kaufmann is “hammering together” his<br />

wooden buildings in Switzerland and southern Germany and teaching at<br />

the Technical University in Munich. Roland Gnaiger is building a hotel in<br />

Switzerland, heads the university architecture class in Linz, and is much in<br />

demand as a lecturer at international events.<br />

The respected international design magazine Wallpaper devoted an entire<br />

issue to the Vorarlberg phenomenon, writing in its preface: “Having scoured<br />

the globe we are unanimous in our decision to name Vorarlberg as the most<br />

progressive part of the planet when it comes to new architecture.”<br />

Meanwhile, Vorarlberg has become so open architecturally that almost<br />

nothing is taboo. In 1961 there was still heated discussion over the expansion<br />

of the Brand Parish Church by Helmut Eisentle, Bernhard Haeckel and Leopold<br />

Kaufmann when the three architects gave the Late Gothic church a simple<br />

but dominant wooden collar. But today the spartan but sensual funeral<br />

chapels of Marte & Marte are viewed with admiring and even proud eyes.<br />

After all, a church is not just a place of quiet, a supermarket not just a<br />

consumer destination, a school not just an educational institution, a bridge<br />

not just the connection between A and B, and a house not just a roof over<br />

the heads of a family. These are all places where people move, touch and<br />

are moved and touched. Vorarlberg architects have understood that and<br />

communicated it perfectly.<br />

“If Vorarlberg wants to present itself culturally, architecture is the perfect<br />

vehicle”, is the prevailing view of all the province’s architects. Roland Gnaiger<br />

thinks he knows why: “The difference between Vorarlberg and the rest of<br />

Europe is that we have an architectural climate that includes every social<br />

class. It’s like the theatre climate in Vienna.”<br />

And there’s statistical support for that notion. In his book Konstruktive<br />

Provokation. Neues Bauen in Vorarlberg (“Constructive Provocation: New<br />

Architecture in Vorarlberg”), Otto Kapfinger lists the province’s facilities.<br />

81

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!