08.12.2012 Aufrufe

THEMEN: Netzwerk Frauenforschung NRW JOURNAL Nr. 20/2006

THEMEN: Netzwerk Frauenforschung NRW JOURNAL Nr. 20/2006

THEMEN: Netzwerk Frauenforschung NRW JOURNAL Nr. 20/2006

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.

YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.

Proposals will be accepted according to their quality. Other general criteria for the acceptance of a paper<br />

are:<br />

aims of the tracks (see track descriptions below)<br />

innovativeness of the research question / research design, policy approach or intervention<br />

analytical development of the topic<br />

the organisers are interested in inter- and transdisciplinary research as well as in papers based on an<br />

analytical perspective.<br />

Papers dealing with questions of gender and race, class, sexual orientation or age discrimination are<br />

especially welcome.<br />

We also invite practitioners to present papers. We especially encourage papers based on the experience of<br />

practitioners and academics working together. General criteria for these abstracts are:<br />

innovative action and intervention to promote gender equality in higher education<br />

interventions and programmes that are transferable to other institutions/countries,<br />

examples of effective positive actions.<br />

The conference will be an opportunity to present the research of well established scholars as well as young<br />

scientists.<br />

Deadline for submission of abstracts: 31 August <strong>20</strong>06.<br />

Decisions on the acceptance or rejection of papers will be made in November <strong>20</strong>06.<br />

We are aware that there might be overlaps in research designs between tracks of the conference. The<br />

organisers therefore will maintain their right to exchange abstracts between tracks.<br />

A collection of the abstracts of all accepted papers will be given to the conference participants. We also<br />

plan to publish a selection of the conference papers. In case of acceptance your full paper should not<br />

exceed 15 pages, 12pt font.<br />

Deadline for submission of full papers will be 1 July <strong>20</strong>07.<br />

Registration, conference fees, accommodation<br />

The conference fee will depend on how much external funding we can get for this conference. Therefore the<br />

exact amount cannot be fixed at this time. All participants, including presenters of papers have to pay the<br />

full conference fee.<br />

We will try to look for external funding to offer financial support for young scientists and / or for scholars<br />

from Eastern Europe who otherwise might be unable to participate. Please let us know if you would need<br />

financial help to attend the conference.<br />

Participants have to arrange their accommodation individually. The organizers will present a selection of<br />

hotels and hostels within walking distance to the conference venue that will offer special rates for<br />

conference participants.<br />

Track A: Excellence, Gender Bias and Research Policy<br />

Up to now excellence in science by many is considered neutral from a gender point of view. Gender<br />

differences and gaps in scientific careers, research outputs and funding have been ignored. Scientific<br />

excellence is open to definition, e. g. concerning the indicators and criteria used to measure and assess<br />

scientific excellence.<br />

At present, we can find a gendered construction of scientific quality that is built on four questions:<br />

1) How is scientific competence assessed?<br />

2) How are assessment procedures organised and evaluators selected?<br />

3) How is scientific competence attributed to men and women? How is this process influenced by the scientific<br />

area: 'hard' science with low rate of women or humanities and social science with high rate of women?<br />

4) What is considered as scientific success and how is it produced?<br />

In this track we are interested in the state for art in creating and measuring scientific excellence (including<br />

what conceptualisations underpin different practices and techniques) and how these practices can be<br />

gendered and create gender bias. Is it possible to think about new or different ways of defining and<br />

measuring excellence, and develop measures and practices that will indicate benefit for all?<br />

News<br />

For more information please<br />

contact<br />

Dr. Marianne Kriszio,<br />

Humboldt-University Berlin,<br />

EQ-Berlin<strong>20</strong>07@uv.hu-berlin.de<br />

or have a look on the<br />

conference website: http://<br />

www2.hu-berlin.de/eqberlin<strong>20</strong>07<br />

Journal <strong>Netzwerk</strong> <strong>Frauenforschung</strong> <strong>NRW</strong> <strong>Nr</strong>. <strong>20</strong>/<strong>20</strong>06 13

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!