22.02.2013 Views

MPTB AS-1773 Fiber Optics Data Bus - NASA Electronic Parts and ...

MPTB AS-1773 Fiber Optics Data Bus - NASA Electronic Parts and ...

MPTB AS-1773 Fiber Optics Data Bus - NASA Electronic Parts and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ABSTRACT<br />

***DRAFT ***<br />

<strong>MPTB</strong> <strong>AS</strong>-<strong>1773</strong> <strong>Fiber</strong> <strong>Optics</strong> <strong>Data</strong> <strong>Bus</strong> (FODB) Lessons Learned<br />

Christian Seidleck<br />

We present the experiences <strong>and</strong> lessons learned in design <strong>and</strong> implementation of N<strong>AS</strong>A GSFC’s Dual Rate <strong>1773</strong><br />

(DR<strong>1773</strong> or <strong>AS</strong><strong>1773</strong>) Experiment on the Naval Research Laboratory’s (NRL) Microelectronic <strong>and</strong> Photonic Test Bed<br />

(<strong>MPTB</strong>). This includes radiation effects testing, design parameters <strong>and</strong> possible design recommendations for future<br />

consideration.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

N<strong>AS</strong>A first began using fiber optics for spaceflight with the MIL-STD-<strong>1773</strong> data bus on board the Solar Anomalous<br />

Magnetospheric Particle Explorer (SAMPEX), launched in July 1992 [1]. Since that time, the <strong>1773</strong> bus has flown<br />

successfully on N<strong>AS</strong>A GSFC missions including the X-Ray Timing Explorer (XTE), Tropical Rainfall Measuring<br />

Mission (TRMM) <strong>and</strong> the Hubble Space Telescope [2]. The <strong>AS</strong><strong>1773</strong> bus st<strong>and</strong>ard, created by the Society of Automotive<br />

Engineers (SAE) Avionics Systems Division (<strong>AS</strong>D) [3], is derived from the MIL-STD-<strong>1773</strong> fiber optic data bus <strong>and</strong><br />

incorporates a reduced radiation-induced bit error rate (BER) as well as implementing a 1 <strong>and</strong> 20Mbps dual rate<br />

capacity. The <strong>MPTB</strong>, launched in late 1996, proved to be a great opportunity to collect radiation effects data on the<br />

<strong>AS</strong><strong>1773</strong> bus in a harsh radiation environment. The flight experiment has been flying <strong>and</strong> providing in flight data<br />

continuously for more than 5 years. This paper presents some of the lessons learned during the design <strong>and</strong><br />

implementation of the DR<strong>1773</strong> flight experiment. These lessons include discussions of SEUs during ground irradiation<br />

<strong>and</strong> for spaceflight data as well as design considerations.<br />

<strong>AS</strong><strong>1773</strong> Description <strong>and</strong> Background<br />

The <strong>AS</strong><strong>1773</strong> is derived from the MIL-STD-<strong>1773</strong> fiber optic data bus which operates at a single data rate of 1Mbps.<br />

MIL-STD-<strong>1773</strong> is the fiber optic equivalent of the all-electrical MIL-STD-1553 bus using the same communication<br />

protocol but a different physical transmission medium. <strong>AS</strong><strong>1773</strong> maintained the <strong>1773</strong> <strong>and</strong> 1553 logical protocol heritage,<br />

but added greater b<strong>and</strong>width capability by introducing the 20Mbps operation in addition to the 1Mbps <strong>1773</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard [3].<br />

Figure 1 shows the <strong>AS</strong><strong>1773</strong> A bus in its full capacity 32 node configuration. <strong>AS</strong><strong>1773</strong> is a star coupled dual redundant<br />

bus utilizing two 32x32 buses in its full implementation.<br />

Figure 1. A Representative <strong>AS</strong><strong>1773</strong> System


Original <strong>1773</strong> transceivers (with Si photodiodes) were sensitive to direct ionization from protons meaning they would<br />

exhibit a high BER in space applications. For this reason, the use of <strong>1773</strong> protocol fault-tolerant message retries was<br />

implemented in the DR<strong>1773</strong>. Although this allowed for successful use of <strong>1773</strong> in multiple N<strong>AS</strong>A missions, it reduced<br />

effective bus b<strong>and</strong>width by ~50%. This may not be acceptable for high data rate systems. Other hardening techniques<br />

were also employed in the DR<strong>1773</strong> including reduced volume of the photodiode, receiver filtering, as well as a TID<br />

hardening process.<br />

DR<strong>1773</strong> Experiment Design<br />

The DR<strong>1773</strong> was designed to simulate an <strong>AS</strong><strong>1773</strong> spacecraft bus. Briefly, the experiment consisted of three sections;<br />

the optical section, device under test (DUT) section, <strong>and</strong> the experiment control section. The experiment control section<br />

is located inside an A1280 Actel field programmable gate array (FPGA) which controls the experiment operation <strong>and</strong><br />

houses the comm<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> telemetry interface to the <strong>MPTB</strong> motherboard. The optical section consists of 100/140um<br />

optical fibers, 8x8 fiber optic star coupler <strong>and</strong> fiber optic terminations. The DUT section consists of two Boeing 1300nm<br />

<strong>AS</strong><strong>1773</strong> transceivers. A more detailed description of the experiment has previously been published in Jackson [4].<br />

The experiment begins with a mode comm<strong>and</strong> from the <strong>MPTB</strong> host processor. Once this comm<strong>and</strong> is received, the<br />

control section will generate a Manchester encoded 32-bit pseudo-r<strong>and</strong>om message. The control section will then select<br />

a DUT transmitter <strong>and</strong> receiver <strong>and</strong> send the message out over the bus. The control section then reads the message back<br />

for comparison. If the return message is different from the generated message then an error counter is incremented. This<br />

process is continued until another mode comm<strong>and</strong> is sent, or the experiment is turned off. A total word counter is<br />

incremented for each message sent over the fiber optic link. This word counter can be used in conjunction with the error<br />

counter for each mode to determine bit error rate information.<br />

The experiment operates at 20Mbps only in one of two defined modes. “ED” mode where transceiver 1 sends messages<br />

to transceiver 2 or “DE” mode which reverses the transmission direction between transceivers. As noted in previous<br />

publications, the physical optical fiber connections for these two links are different. ED uses a physical contact (PC)<br />

polished fiber optic terminal as opposed to DE mode’s flat polished. <strong>Data</strong> presented over the life of this experiment<br />

supports the idea that the PC termini provides a more robust <strong>and</strong> lower loss scheme of optical connection.<br />

Ground Proton Testing<br />

Results from tests performed prior to flight are summarized below in Table 1. Receiver proton testing was performed<br />

with varied optical attenuation using a nominal -17dB, -23 <strong>and</strong> -25dB. Proton incident angle was varied, <strong>and</strong> energies<br />

used were 63Mev degraded to 38.2MeV. For proton total ionizing dose (TID) no degradation was observed at 35 kRads<br />

(Si). No heavy ion testing was performed due to packaging limitations, however, the devices were suspected of heavy<br />

ion sensitivity.<br />

<strong>Data</strong> Rate 1Mbps 20Mbps<br />

Normal Optical No SEUs 1 error total all runs (s <<br />

Attenuation<br />

1.4 E -10 cm 2<br />

Additional Optical<br />

Attenuation<br />

No SEUs @ -23dB See graph<br />

Angular Incidence N/A See graph<br />

Energy Dependence N/A Minimal (10-20%)<br />

Table 1 Boeing DR<strong>1773</strong> Proton SEU Test Results- Receiver


Figure 2 shows the error cross section vs. induced optical attenuation. Figure 3 shows the error cross section vs. beam<br />

incidence angle.<br />

Error Cross section in cm 2<br />

Error Cross Section in cm 2<br />

1.00E-06<br />

1.00E-07<br />

1.00E-08<br />

1.00E-09<br />

1.00E-10<br />

Errors observed<br />

No errors observed<br />

1.00E-11<br />

-30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0<br />

Link Attenuation in dB<br />

Figure 2 Error cross section vs. attenuation 90 degrees incidence<br />

1.00E-06<br />

1.00E-07<br />

1.00E-08<br />

1.00E-09<br />

In-Flight Experiment Results<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100 120<br />

Angle<br />

-27 dB Atten<br />

-23 dB Atten<br />

Figure 3 Receiver error cross section by beam incidence angle<br />

As previously mentioned, the number of errors on each of the two fiber optic links is being captured. Note that these<br />

modes are mutually exclusive (only one link is active at a time). For this reason, results for each of the modes are<br />

presented separately. Figure 4 shows the daily number of errors for mode 1 or “ED” mode over ~5 years of collected<br />

data. This mode uses the PC fiber optic termini <strong>and</strong> has performed robustly with an overall bit error rate BER=2.118E -14<br />

errors/bit.<br />

Figure 5 shows the daily number of errors for mode 2 or “DE” mode for a lesser period of time. This is in part due to the<br />

fact that the experiment was comm<strong>and</strong>ed in DE mode less of the time <strong>and</strong> for shorter periods of time. The data shows<br />

this mode, which utilizes the flat connection termini has a much higher susceptibility to errors. A BER of 6.609E -11<br />

errors/bit was calculated for the time spent in this mode. Table 2 summarizes the breakdown of BER per year by mode.


Number of Upsets<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

334<br />

39<br />

80<br />

121<br />

197<br />

238<br />

279<br />

320<br />

361<br />

37<br />

148<br />

233<br />

289<br />

1<br />

91<br />

Julian Day of Year<br />

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002<br />

Figure 4 <strong>MPTB</strong> Transceiver Errors ED Mode 1997-2002 Orbits 0036-3321<br />

Number of Upsets<br />

400<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

157<br />

170<br />

183<br />

Upsets<br />

Upset Average = 103.667<br />

52<br />

73<br />

86<br />

114<br />

142<br />

189<br />

218<br />

Julian Day of Year<br />

1998 1999 2000<br />

Figure 5 <strong>MPTB</strong> Transceiver DE Mode 1998-2000 Orbits 0036-3111<br />

260<br />

303<br />

331<br />

Year ED BER DE BER<br />

1997 1.738E -12<br />

1998 4.224E -14<br />

1999 3.855E -14<br />

N/A<br />

3.787E -11<br />

5.303E -11<br />

2000 0 8.501E -11<br />

2001 8.168E -15<br />

N/A<br />

2002 0 N/A<br />

Table 2 ED <strong>and</strong> DE bit error rates by Year<br />

8<br />

34<br />

206<br />

61<br />

300<br />

74<br />

336<br />

133<br />

11<br />

146<br />

52<br />

Average Daily Upsets = 0.0208<br />

159<br />

94<br />

172<br />

135<br />

185<br />

177<br />

198<br />

218<br />

259<br />

259<br />

272<br />

307<br />

285<br />

348<br />

24<br />

70<br />

111


References<br />

[1] M. Flanegan, K. LaBel, “Small Explorer <strong>Data</strong> System MIL-STD-<strong>1773</strong> <strong>Fiber</strong> Optic <strong>Bus</strong>”, N<strong>AS</strong>A Technical Paper 3227,<br />

June 1992.<br />

[2] P.J. Luers, H.L. Culver, J. Plante, “GSFC Cutting Edge Avionics Technologies for Spacecraft”, AIAA Defense <strong>and</strong><br />

Civil Space Programs Conference, Paper 98-5238.<br />

[3] “Interoperability Requirements for <strong>AS</strong><strong>1773</strong>”, AIR-4957 Draft 2.1, May 1996.<br />

[4] G.L. Jackson, K.A. LaBel, C.J. Marshall, J.L. Barth, J. Kolasinski, C.M. Seidleck, P.W. Marshall, “Preliminary Flight<br />

Results of the Microelectronics <strong>and</strong> Photonic Test Bed (<strong>MPTB</strong>) N<strong>AS</strong>A Dual Rate <strong>1773</strong> (DR<strong>1773</strong>) fiber Optic <strong>Data</strong><br />

<strong>Bus</strong>”, GOMAC Conference, 1997.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!