SAF-RC-051 100 & 300 Area Component. of the ... - Hanford Site

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TO.p. Pw+dn.n A hpbrt 0 Pp MD P.pluk e "0" P.nNwlpllal P.p.0 .A P.O s Pqk c P.prw.D R.ppoP n ^. Mw.w S+ W D\m"Wq BLUEGRASS DaamH TEST C a P.l\I\ nqw Tr SM DPC 0144200 `+rs DnDoauôawQa +..NLarxtôn jj .TT @ Comm Pxpa (lx IH ^m l^ 100% REPLICATE. PWMW e 3 q c O 3 D' ! N D.wO. Ml.d pROl.11ee . t!. E2T4solaw ig I,SNL sseeftwrkaw I..,1.TL rns T8Avs POSE. I ATs POST. _ AH' 1 Nil& ^D pa ftod 3 11 3 1 1 3 Ik.AI\eP.ol wMp! TF T.nvll TM1IN1 Wl D\.•.a\âq A 0 1{ 9 e Z. b 2 tob. 00.1 D. mw A.o.ukA IbppPl.s P.pk"C P.pk\l.o Pppkak E c o .1 •231. 1foll. ^ P^ M.r.pn AOM lwp.\ lvs. Zb > ONE Mi.NLV 0."Y.P pK! A 1W J . nul lM p1^w\P.rA W.11! OPD.P P.D e 0 CD ,., D. c .. .. P I o Ivn Ir. nun nw, PAPê Mr) An .A ,en TR All - 3zn=, MEM",'^^ Iêlrl^^5i^tl\Lib7 n 1^ ^^ p.\ ^ 1iQ^ ^ ^^ ^^ ^l4iQ:I n ^^ -13-
CETIS Test Summary Pape 1 of 3 Report Date: 18 Ju1-08129 PM Test link 07-4737.3144/8154201p$B Plant Bloassay-Chronic CH2M Hill Test No: 03-0378.5225 Test Type: PlantChronlc Duration: WA Start Date: 25Jan•06 Protocol: ASTM E1963-02 (2002) Species: Poa sMKft g9 Ending Date: DII Water. Source: Setup Date: 25 Jan-M orins: Comments: recalculated Height and Length data July 18. 2008 Sample No: 18-1426-8954 Code: 81542-01 Client: Sample Date. 31 Oct-05 Mater4l: Sod Project: Receive Dab: Source. Hanford Sample Age: 86d Oh Station: Comments: J10DW4, E274801 Comparison Summary Analysis Endpoint NOFIL LOEL ChV PM3D Method 04.6686.9248 %Germination 100 WA 18.50% Equal Variance U o•Sampls 10-5567-7574 Average AG Wt (Wet. mg) 4100 100 WA 27.27% Equal Variance I; Two-Sample 194244.1707 Average AG Wt (Dry, mg) 4100 100 WA 3824% Equal Variance tTwoSample 02-5160-3380 Average Root Wt. (Wet mg 100 > 100 WA 41A2% Equal Variance tTwoSampie 06.27742762 Average Rod WL (Dry, mg) 4100 100 WA 45.60% Equal Variance ! Two-Sample 14.6818.7289 Average Total Wt (Wet Mg 4100 100 WA 33.72% Equal Variance It TwoSampN 13.2852-1747 Average Total Wt (Dry, mg) 4100 100 WA 40.05% Equal Variance t7Wo-Sample 000-092-1014 CEnSw v1.1.2revl Analyst_,!r— Approval: -14-
Page 1 and 2: 0070470 SAF-RC-051 100 & 300 Area C
Page 3 and 4: G rrrbrr yb^ rrrm a r war M w a [pr
Page 5 and 6: CONTENTS Secdon Page INTRODUCTION..
Page 7 and 8: SAMPLE COLLECTION Individual soil s
Page 9 and 10: DATA ANALYSIS For each test chamber
Page 11 and 12: RESULTS AND Table 2 summarizes the
Page 13 and 14: CERTIFICATION STATEMENT I certify t
Page 15: BWfGRASS GROWTH TUT n,.er..1.eRAl.a
Page 19 and 20: CETIS Test Summary % Germination De
Page 21 and 22: CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 23 and 24: CETIS Analysis Detail Plant Bioassa
Page 25 and 26: MIS Analysis Detail Comparisons: Pa
Page 29 and 30: MIS Test Summa ry Page 1 of 3 Repor
Page 31 and 32: CETIS Test Summary % Gemination Det
Page 39 and 40: CETIS An alysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 41 and 42: CETIS Test Summary Pagel of 2 Repor
Page 47 and 48: Comparisons: Page 5of 7 Report Data
Page 51 and 52: CETIS Test Summary Page 1 of 3 Repo
Page 53 and 54: CETIS Test Summary %Germination Det
Page 59 and 60: CEM Analysis Detail Plant Bloassay
Page 63 and 64: Y Wo.w P. PAOIi A avP 8 a.pcw c Rwb
Page 65 and 66: CETIS Test Summary %Germination Sum
Page 67 and 68:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
CETIS Analysis Detail Plant Bioassa
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
CETIS Test Summary Pape 1 of 3 Repo
Page 79 and 80:
CETIS Test Summa ry % Germination D
Page 81 and 82:
CEfIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 83 and 84:
MIS Analysis Detail Comparisons: Pa
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
CETIS An alysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 89 and 90:
140.1. rorr,.. M1yATMA WpbY. Rw1wMC
Page 91 and 92:
MIS Test Summary % Germination Summ
Page 93 and 94:
CETIS Analysis Detail Compa risons:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparlsonat
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
CETIS Analysis Detail Compa ri sons
Page 103 and 104:
CETIS Test Summa ry Page 1 of 2 Rep
Page 105 and 106:
CETIS Analysis Detail Plant Bloassa
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
CUIS Analysis Detail Comparisons: p
Page 111 and 112:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisons-
Page 113 and 114:
CETIS Test Summary Page 1 of 3 Repo
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
CETIS Analysis Detail Plant Bloassa
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
APPENDIX B CHAIN OF CUSTODY -122-
Page 127 and 128:
^, A901 WVashinzton Closure Hanford
Page 129 and 130:
£ A^kv& asllinaton Closure Hanford
Page 131 and 132:
6,2Y57 iWashin )3ton Closure Hanfor
Page 133 and 134:
NIAlshineton Closure Hanford CHAIN
Page 135 and 136:
July 20, 2006 ELR Inc. PROJECT MANA
Page 137 and 138:
BIOASSAY REPORT CHRONIC SCREENING B
Page 139 and 140:
INTRODUCTION CH2M HILL conducted ch
Page 141 and 142:
TEST 1MTIATION Tests were initiated
Page 143 and 144:
DATA ANALYSIS For each test chamber
Page 145 and 146:
ILaw2W ggggg IwwgW LIE ggg 8i0.^X C
Page 147 and 148:
APPENDIX A RAW DATA SHEETS -11-
Page 149 and 150:
--F^= 2 'Zto l M %Q7 01 0' b e' tv
Page 151 and 152:
CETIS Test Summary %Germination Sum
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
CUTS An alysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
CUIS Analysis Detail Comparisons: P
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
CETIS Test Summary %Germination Det
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
CETIS Analysis Detail Compar isons:
Page 171 and 172:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisonw.
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
ELUEARA760ROWrATl8T are wrMgm.cmm..
Page 177 and 178:
COS Test Summary Y. Germination Sum
Page 179 and 180:
CEfIS Analysis Detail Plant ant Com
Page 181 and 182:
Comparisons: Page 1 of 1 Report Dat
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Comparisons: Page 9ol 9 &32 AM CETI
Page 189 and 190:
CETIS Test Summary Pape 1 of 3 Repo
Page 191 and 192:
MIS Test Summary %Germination Detai
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
o.ne..rrw.^ ftOu A Aye a RyvrC _ R6
Page 203 and 204:
CETIS Test Summary % Germination Su
Page 205 and 206:
CUTS Analysis Detail Comparisons: P
Page 207 and 208:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparlsons:
Page 209 and 210:
CETIS Anarysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
CETIS Test Summary % Germination De
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
1I.r•+ 51e "%t 1xs+ur l.p/r,./ 1.
Page 229 and 230:
CETIS Test Summary % Germination Su
Page 231 and 232:
Comparisons: Pape 1 of 9 Report Dat
Page 233 and 234:
CETIS Analysis Detail. Comparisons:
Page 235 and 236:
CETIS Analysis Detail ' Comparisons
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
CET1S Test Summary Page 1 of 3 Repo
Page 243 and 244:
CETIS Test Summary %Germination Det
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:,
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
BLLMGRASS GROWTH TM lL a../ wwJYq..
Page 255 and 256:
CEfIS Test Summary %Germination Sum
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
CET{S Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
CETIS An alysis Detail Compariso ns
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
21 Ill 8ot ^Vasldnitton Closure Han
Page 269 and 270:
L• A 1y r. ) 7 E ?- ,a VI'1lshin
Page 271 and 272:
Washington Closure Hartford CHAIN O
Page 273 and 274:
IW 70 Washington Closure Hanford CH
show all

SAF-RC-051 100 & 300 Area Component. of the ... - Hanford Site

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?