SAF-RC-051 100 & 300 Area Component. of the ... - Hanford Site

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisons: Pap 7of 8 Report Date: 18 JuWM 2:17 PM Analysts: 06.1145.53511B154202ps8 Plant Bioassay . Chronic CH2M Nil Endpoint Analysis Type SampleLlnk ControlUnk DateAn slyzed Version Average Total Wt (Wet, mg) Compa rison 1"985.7214 1"985-7214 18 Jul-08217 PM CETISv1.12 M ethod Alt H Data Tmnsform Zeta NOEL LOEL Toxic Units ChV PMSD Equal Va ri ance lTwo-Sampls C>T Untranatonne0 1100 )100 1 WA 51.32% G roup Comparisons Control vs Cone-% Statistic Critical P Valve MSD Deelsion(0.05) Ar tificial SoNSedl 100 -0.4458 1.85955 0.6661 90.9112 Non-Sigr ihant Effect ANGVATabie Source Sun of SquaresMean Square DF F Statistic RVslue Dseision(0.05) Between 1186.341 1186.341 1 020 0.66771 Non.Sig nifiantEHect Error 47802.41 5975.302 8 Total 48988.7550 7181.8427 9 AHOVAAssumplons Attkbute T es t Statistic Critical P•VakW Declslon(0.01) Va ri ances Variance Rat io F 2.51228 23.15450 0.39406 Equal Variances Distmution Shapiro-Wilk W 0.96972 0.88820 Normal Disbibu llon Data Summary Original Data Transformed Data Conc -PI.Control Type Court Mean Minimum Maximum SO Mean Minknum Maximum SD 0 Artificial SOWS 5 177.14 93.113 240.86 58.331 100 S 198.92 70.053 317.38 92.456 Graph ics 1 1 r 1 r t 0 a 100 COM-% ^ 1 r e r i a r r a •r " n r 1a •LS -tA -03 OA 0.S 1.a fA Idmklb 000.092-101-1 CEfISTM vl.12revl Analyst Approval: r rrn . to -35-
CETIS An alysis Detail Comparisons: Page 8 al! 8 Report Dale: 18 Jul-06 217 PM Analysis: 08.7364.887l/8154202psO Pl t Bioassay • Ch ronic CH2M Hi ll an Endpoint Analys is Type Sample Unk Control Unk Date Analyzed Version Average Total WI (Dry. mg) Compa rison 16$985.7214 16 419857214 18JW-05ZITPM CETISA.12 Method Alt H Data Wonsform Zeta NOEL LOEL Toxic Units ChV PMSD Equal Variance I Two-Sample Group Comparisons C>T Untranslamed NOOM 100 MOO 1 WA 59.609E Control vs Cone-% Ststist le Critical P•VStuo MSD Dedsion(0.05) Arti ficial So'USed 100 -02489 1.85965 0.6951 12.0485 Nen•Slo ant Effe ct ANOVATable Source Sum of SquaresMoan SquareDF FStatlstle P-Value Doelsion(C.05) Between 6.502558 &502588 1 0.06 0.80970 Non-SlgnifiantEffe ct Error 839.6294 104.9537 8 Total 846.131982 111.45626 9 ANOVAAUUmptions Attribute Test Statistic Critical P Valuo Dacision(0.01) Variances Variance Hallo F 1.70337 23.15450 0.61853 Equal Variances DisUbu tion Shapiro-Wirt W 0.98503 0.84128 Normal Distribu tion Data Summa ry Orig in al Daft Transformed Data Cone-•,G ConbviType Cou ntMoan Minimum Maximum SD Moan Minimum Maximum SD 0 Artificial SOWS 3 20.217 12223 33.384 8.8117 100 5 21.830 GAT 38.17 11.500 Graph ic s _ t 20 r I 1 ^ 1 1 • Y t i 1 1 ^ p 1 1 1 -------------- 1 1 ' e 0 100 4e -!j •1a -0.S O.e 0.f IA 1S I.e CarK-rh NnMitl 000-092-101-1 CETlSr vl.1.2rev1 Analyst i"' Appraval: -36- 1 1 1 1 1 1
Page 1 and 2: 0070470 SAF-RC-051 100 & 300 Area C
Page 3 and 4: G rrrbrr yb^ rrrm a r war M w a [pr
Page 5 and 6: CONTENTS Secdon Page INTRODUCTION..
Page 7 and 8: SAMPLE COLLECTION Individual soil s
Page 9 and 10: DATA ANALYSIS For each test chamber
Page 11 and 12: RESULTS AND Table 2 summarizes the
Page 13 and 14: CERTIFICATION STATEMENT I certify t
Page 15 and 16: BWfGRASS GROWTH TUT n,.er..1.eRAl.a
Page 17 and 18: CETIS Test Summary Pape 1 of 3 Repo
Page 19 and 20: CETIS Test Summary % Germination De
Page 21 and 22: CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 23 and 24: CETIS Analysis Detail Plant Bioassa
Page 25 and 26: MIS Analysis Detail Comparisons: Pa
Page 29 and 30: MIS Test Summa ry Page 1 of 3 Repor
Page 31 and 32: CETIS Test Summary % Gemination Det
Page 37: CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 41 and 42: CETIS Test Summary Pagel of 2 Repor
Page 47 and 48: Comparisons: Page 5of 7 Report Data
Page 51 and 52: CETIS Test Summary Page 1 of 3 Repo
Page 53 and 54: CETIS Test Summary %Germination Det
Page 59 and 60: CEM Analysis Detail Plant Bloassay
Page 63 and 64: Y Wo.w P. PAOIi A avP 8 a.pcw c Rwb
Page 65 and 66: CETIS Test Summary %Germination Sum
Page 77 and 78: CETIS Test Summary Pape 1 of 3 Repo
Page 79 and 80: CETIS Test Summa ry % Germination D
Page 81 and 82: CEfIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 83 and 84: MIS Analysis Detail Comparisons: Pa
Page 87 and 88: CETIS An alysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 89 and 90:
140.1. rorr,.. M1yATMA WpbY. Rw1wMC
Page 91 and 92:
MIS Test Summary % Germination Summ
Page 93 and 94:
CETIS Analysis Detail Compa risons:
Page 95 and 96:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 97 and 98:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparlsonat
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
CETIS Analysis Detail Compa ri sons
Page 103 and 104:
CETIS Test Summa ry Page 1 of 2 Rep
Page 105 and 106:
CETIS Analysis Detail Plant Bloassa
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
CUIS Analysis Detail Comparisons: p
Page 111 and 112:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisons-
Page 113 and 114:
CETIS Test Summary Page 1 of 3 Repo
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
CETIS Analysis Detail Plant Bioassa
Page 121 and 122:
CETIS Analysis Detail Plant Bloassa
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
APPENDIX B CHAIN OF CUSTODY -122-
Page 127 and 128:
^, A901 WVashinzton Closure Hanford
Page 129 and 130:
£ A^kv& asllinaton Closure Hanford
Page 131 and 132:
6,2Y57 iWashin )3ton Closure Hanfor
Page 133 and 134:
NIAlshineton Closure Hanford CHAIN
Page 135 and 136:
July 20, 2006 ELR Inc. PROJECT MANA
Page 137 and 138:
BIOASSAY REPORT CHRONIC SCREENING B
Page 139 and 140:
INTRODUCTION CH2M HILL conducted ch
Page 141 and 142:
TEST 1MTIATION Tests were initiated
Page 143 and 144:
DATA ANALYSIS For each test chamber
Page 145 and 146:
ILaw2W ggggg IwwgW LIE ggg 8i0.^X C
Page 147 and 148:
APPENDIX A RAW DATA SHEETS -11-
Page 149 and 150:
--F^= 2 'Zto l M %Q7 01 0' b e' tv
Page 151 and 152:
CETIS Test Summary %Germination Sum
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
CUTS An alysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
CUIS Analysis Detail Comparisons: P
Page 161 and 162:
CEfIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
CETIS Test Summary %Germination Det
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
CETIS Analysis Detail Compar isons:
Page 171 and 172:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisonw.
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
ELUEARA760ROWrATl8T are wrMgm.cmm..
Page 177 and 178:
COS Test Summary Y. Germination Sum
Page 179 and 180:
CEfIS Analysis Detail Plant ant Com
Page 181 and 182:
Comparisons: Page 1 of 1 Report Dat
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Comparisons: Page 9ol 9 &32 AM CETI
Page 189 and 190:
CETIS Test Summary Pape 1 of 3 Repo
Page 191 and 192:
MIS Test Summary %Germination Detai
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
o.ne..rrw.^ ftOu A Aye a RyvrC _ R6
Page 203 and 204:
CETIS Test Summary % Germination Su
Page 205 and 206:
CUTS Analysis Detail Comparisons: P
Page 207 and 208:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparlsons:
Page 209 and 210:
CETIS Anarysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
CETIS Analysis Detail Plant Bioassa
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
CETIS Test Summary % Germination De
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
1I.r•+ 51e "%t 1xs+ur l.p/r,./ 1.
Page 229 and 230:
CETIS Test Summary % Germination Su
Page 231 and 232:
Comparisons: Pape 1 of 9 Report Dat
Page 233 and 234:
CETIS Analysis Detail. Comparisons:
Page 235 and 236:
CETIS Analysis Detail ' Comparisons
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
CET1S Test Summary Page 1 of 3 Repo
Page 243 and 244:
CETIS Test Summary %Germination Det
Page 245 and 246:
CEfIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 247 and 248:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:,
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
BLLMGRASS GROWTH TM lL a../ wwJYq..
Page 255 and 256:
CEfIS Test Summary %Germination Sum
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
CET{S Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
CETIS An alysis Detail Compariso ns
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
21 Ill 8ot ^Vasldnitton Closure Han
Page 269 and 270:
L• A 1y r. ) 7 E ?- ,a VI'1lshin
Page 271 and 272:
Washington Closure Hartford CHAIN O
Page 273 and 274:
IW 70 Washington Closure Hanford CH
show all

SAF-RC-051 100 & 300 Area Component. of the ... - Hanford Site

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?