SAF-RC-051 100 & 300 Area Component. of the ... - Hanford Site

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CETIS Analysis Detail Plant 8foassay-Chronic Comparisons: Page 4 of 7 Report Dab: 18 Jlt-08 222 PM Analysis: 065621-9654IB154203ps8 Endpoint Analysis Type Sample Link Control Link Dab Analyzed Version Averao Root WL (Wet mg) Comparison 10.7237.4516 10-7237.4515 18Ju1-06222PM CETISvl.12 Method All H Date Transform Zeta NOEL. LOEL Toxic Units ChV PMSD Equal Variance lTwoSample C>T Untranslormed 100 >100 1 WA 55.58% .Group Comparisons Control vs • Cone.% Statistic Critical P-Value - MSD Decision(0.05) ArtilIclal SdOSedl 100 -1.7403 145955 0.9400 62.9411 Nonsignificant Effect ANOVATable Source Sum of Squares Mean Square OF F Statistic P-Value Deefsion(0.05) Between 8674.86 8674.80 1 3.03 0.11998 Non-SWftant Effect Error 22913.1 2864.138 S Total 31587.9619 - 11838.998 9 ANOVA Assumptions Attribute Test Statistic Critical P-Value Declslon(0.01 Variances Variance Ratio F 1A9014 23.15450 0.70857 Equal Variances Distribution Shapllo•W& W 0.94145 0.56924 Normal Distribution Dab Summary Original Data Transformed Data Cono-% Control Type Count Mean Minimum Maximum SO Mean Minknum Maximum SO 0 Artificial SOIIIS 5 11323 81.635 15842 47.962 100 8 1172.14 121.91 270.5 58548 Graphics d t t IOD r • r I so I t r t ' 0 0 cono'A IN 60 Is t r i • • r r .24 -Ls -La -U OA 03 Le 13 tlaneas 000-092-101-1 CETIS^ vl.1.2revl Analyst Approval• ' ' r 74 CH2111 1811 -43-
Comparisons: Page 5of 7 Report Data: 18 Jui-06 222 PM Analysis: 01-5964-0324/8154203pe9 Plant Bioassay • Chronic CH2M Hi ll CETIS Analysis Detail Endpoint Analysis Typo Semple Link Control Link Date Analysed Version Average Root Wt (Dry, mill Compari son 10-7237.4516 10.72374516 18 JL" 222 PM CETISv1.12 Method Alt H Data Transform Zeta I NOEL LOEL Toxic Units CIN PMSO Equal Va riance tTwoSample C> T UnIninafomied 100 >100 1 IWA 61.0% Group Comparisons Control ve Cores-% Statistic Critical P Value MSD Dedelon(0.05) Artificial SoWSed 100 -0.8218 1.85955 0.7525 4.83508 Non-540 and Effect ANOVA Table Source Sum of Square& Mean Squa re DF F Statistic P-Valle Decision(0.05) Between 11.41551 11.41551 1 0.68 0.43488 NonSigrAant Effect Enor 1352142 16.90177 8 Total 14(L629681 28.31728 9 ANOVAAssumptions Att ribute Test Statistic Critical P-Value Declslon(0A1) Varfanas Variance Ratio F 1.05701 23.15450 0.95844 Equal Variances Distribution ShaWo-Wi9O W 0.87437 0.11238 Normal Distrbubon Data Summary Original Data Transformed Daft Coney. Control Type Count Mean M inimum Maximum SO Mean Minimum Maximum SO 0 Arbklal SOWS 5 7.8666 338 14.108 4.1678 100 5 10.003 6.05 18.423 4.0538 Graphics t i e ' r r . ^ t r 1 t . • o ' . r o too -10 -u •ta os ' ao os to u u • Coscw awes -44- -DOO-092a 01-1 CETISn'v1.1.2revl Anayst 7r•ApprOraF^_ r r r
Page 1 and 2: 0070470 SAF-RC-051 100 & 300 Area C
Page 3 and 4: G rrrbrr yb^ rrrm a r war M w a [pr
Page 5 and 6: CONTENTS Secdon Page INTRODUCTION..
Page 7 and 8: SAMPLE COLLECTION Individual soil s
Page 9 and 10: DATA ANALYSIS For each test chamber
Page 11 and 12: RESULTS AND Table 2 summarizes the
Page 13 and 14: CERTIFICATION STATEMENT I certify t
Page 15 and 16: BWfGRASS GROWTH TUT n,.er..1.eRAl.a
Page 17 and 18: CETIS Test Summary Pape 1 of 3 Repo
Page 19 and 20: CETIS Test Summary % Germination De
Page 21 and 22: CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 23 and 24: CETIS Analysis Detail Plant Bioassa
Page 25 and 26: MIS Analysis Detail Comparisons: Pa
Page 29 and 30: MIS Test Summa ry Page 1 of 3 Repor
Page 31 and 32: CETIS Test Summary % Gemination Det
Page 39 and 40: CETIS An alysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 41 and 42: CETIS Test Summary Pagel of 2 Repor
Page 45: CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 51 and 52: CETIS Test Summary Page 1 of 3 Repo
Page 53 and 54: CETIS Test Summary %Germination Det
Page 59 and 60: CEM Analysis Detail Plant Bloassay
Page 63 and 64: Y Wo.w P. PAOIi A avP 8 a.pcw c Rwb
Page 65 and 66: CETIS Test Summary %Germination Sum
Page 77 and 78: CETIS Test Summary Pape 1 of 3 Repo
Page 79 and 80: CETIS Test Summa ry % Germination D
Page 81 and 82: CEfIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 83 and 84: MIS Analysis Detail Comparisons: Pa
Page 87 and 88: CETIS An alysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 89 and 90: 140.1. rorr,.. M1yATMA WpbY. Rw1wMC
Page 91 and 92: MIS Test Summary % Germination Summ
Page 93 and 94: CETIS Analysis Detail Compa risons:
Page 97 and 98:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparlsonat
Page 99 and 100:
CETIS Analysis Detail Compa risons:
Page 101 and 102:
CETIS Analysis Detail Compa ri sons
Page 103 and 104:
CETIS Test Summa ry Page 1 of 2 Rep
Page 105 and 106:
CETIS Analysis Detail Plant Bloassa
Page 107 and 108:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 109 and 110:
CUIS Analysis Detail Comparisons: p
Page 111 and 112:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisons-
Page 113 and 114:
CETIS Test Summary Page 1 of 3 Repo
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
CETIS Analysis Detail Plant Bioassa
Page 121 and 122:
CETIS Analysis Detail Plant Bloassa
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
APPENDIX B CHAIN OF CUSTODY -122-
Page 127 and 128:
^, A901 WVashinzton Closure Hanford
Page 129 and 130:
£ A^kv& asllinaton Closure Hanford
Page 131 and 132:
6,2Y57 iWashin )3ton Closure Hanfor
Page 133 and 134:
NIAlshineton Closure Hanford CHAIN
Page 135 and 136:
July 20, 2006 ELR Inc. PROJECT MANA
Page 137 and 138:
BIOASSAY REPORT CHRONIC SCREENING B
Page 139 and 140:
INTRODUCTION CH2M HILL conducted ch
Page 141 and 142:
TEST 1MTIATION Tests were initiated
Page 143 and 144:
DATA ANALYSIS For each test chamber
Page 145 and 146:
ILaw2W ggggg IwwgW LIE ggg 8i0.^X C
Page 147 and 148:
APPENDIX A RAW DATA SHEETS -11-
Page 149 and 150:
--F^= 2 'Zto l M %Q7 01 0' b e' tv
Page 151 and 152:
CETIS Test Summary %Germination Sum
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
CUTS An alysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
CUIS Analysis Detail Comparisons: P
Page 161 and 162:
CEfIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
CETIS Test Summary %Germination Det
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
CETIS Analysis Detail Compar isons:
Page 171 and 172:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisonw.
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
ELUEARA760ROWrATl8T are wrMgm.cmm..
Page 177 and 178:
COS Test Summary Y. Germination Sum
Page 179 and 180:
CEfIS Analysis Detail Plant ant Com
Page 181 and 182:
Comparisons: Page 1 of 1 Report Dat
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Comparisons: Page 9ol 9 &32 AM CETI
Page 189 and 190:
CETIS Test Summary Pape 1 of 3 Repo
Page 191 and 192:
MIS Test Summary %Germination Detai
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
o.ne..rrw.^ ftOu A Aye a RyvrC _ R6
Page 203 and 204:
CETIS Test Summary % Germination Su
Page 205 and 206:
CUTS Analysis Detail Comparisons: P
Page 207 and 208:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparlsons:
Page 209 and 210:
CETIS Anarysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
CETIS Analysis Detail Plant Bioassa
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
CETIS Test Summary % Germination De
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
1I.r•+ 51e "%t 1xs+ur l.p/r,./ 1.
Page 229 and 230:
CETIS Test Summary % Germination Su
Page 231 and 232:
Comparisons: Pape 1 of 9 Report Dat
Page 233 and 234:
CETIS Analysis Detail. Comparisons:
Page 235 and 236:
CETIS Analysis Detail ' Comparisons
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
CET1S Test Summary Page 1 of 3 Repo
Page 243 and 244:
CETIS Test Summary %Germination Det
Page 245 and 246:
CEfIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 247 and 248:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:,
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
BLLMGRASS GROWTH TM lL a../ wwJYq..
Page 255 and 256:
CEfIS Test Summary %Germination Sum
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
CET{S Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
CETIS An alysis Detail Compariso ns
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
21 Ill 8ot ^Vasldnitton Closure Han
Page 269 and 270:
L• A 1y r. ) 7 E ?- ,a VI'1lshin
Page 271 and 272:
Washington Closure Hartford CHAIN O
Page 273 and 274:
IW 70 Washington Closure Hanford CH
show all

SAF-RC-051 100 & 300 Area Component. of the ... - Hanford Site

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?