SAF-RC-051 100 & 300 Area Component. of the ... - Hanford Site

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CETIS Test Summary % Germination Detail Conc=6 Control7ype Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 3 Rep 4 Rep 5 0 Artificial SOWS 1.00000 1.00000 1.000DO 0.60000 0.00000 100 0.80000 1.00000 0.60000 0.80000 1.00000 Average AG Wt (Wet, m9) Detail Cono'.G Control TYPe Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 3 Rap 4 Rep 5 0 Artificial SOWS 67.2900 55.1900 62336 732233 41A750 100 60.3450 90.5860 151.707 75DS75 78.6360 Average AG Wt (Dry, mg) D" Cono-% Control Type Rapt Rap Rep Rap Rep 0 Arseclal SOWS 15.1720 10.552 19.276 8.82688 7.92751 100 11.4500 16.6780 30.6367 11.1275 13.698 Average Root Wt. (Wet, mg) Detail Conc-% Control Type Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 3 Rep 4 Rep 3 0 Artificial SOWS 143.362 140.624 158.524 72.0233 51.6375 100 134.765 172.182 270.5 121.905 161.350 Average Root WL (Dry, mg) Detail Cone.-$A Control Type Rap 1 Rep 2 Rep 3 Rap 4 Rep 3 0 AK&M SOWS 895601 8.39399 14.108 3.77999 4.295 100 7.42999 11.1200 1&4233 6.04999 &99399 Average Total Wt (Wet, mg) DOW Cone-% Control Type Rap 1 Rep 2 Rep 3 Rep 4 Rep 3 0 Ar6fidal SOWS 210.652 195.814 240.882 14&247 93.1125 100 195.11 262.768 422207 19&963 237.986 Average Total WI (Dry, mg) Detail Conc-% Control Type Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 3 Rep 4 Rep 5 0 Ar06dal SoIVS 23.9280 18.948 33.384 12.6088 111 100 1amo0 27.7980 47.0600 17.1775 22.69 Page 2 of 2 Report Date: 18 JL" 222 PM Test Unic 10-7237-4516IB154203psB OCM2-101-1 CETIS'n v1.1.2revl Analyst 2r- . Approval: -39-
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisons: Pays 1 of 7 Report Date: 18 Jul-06 222 PM Analysis: 12.3597-795BI81542D3ps8 Plant Bloassay-Chronic CH2M Hill Endpoint Analysis Type SampieLlnk ControlUnk DateAnslyt:ed Version %Germination Comparison 1D-7237.4516 10.7237.4518 18JuW8222PM CETISv1.12 Method Alt H Data Transform Zeh NOEL LOEL Toxic Units ChV PMSO FAualVanancetTwo-Sampis C>T Angutar(Comecied) 100 >100 1 WA 2280% Group Comparisons Control Vs Cone.% Statistic Critical P Value MSO Decislon(0.05) Artificial SoIVSedl 1DD 0137677 1.85955 03581 023508 Nonsignificant Erred ANOVATable Source Sum of Squares Mean Square OF F Statistic P-Value Daeislon(0.05) Between 0.0056708 0.005671 1 0.14 0.71614 Non-Significant Effect Error 0.3195545 0.039948 a Total 0.3252554 0.0456159 9 ANOVAAssumptions Attribute Test Stallatie Critical P-Value Docision(0.01) Variances Variance Ratio F 1.14108 23.15450 0.90131 Equal Variances Dlsb1buaon Shapiro-Witit W 0.85889 0.07404 Normal Dishibu5an Data Summary Original Data Transformed Data Conc.-/. Control Type Count Mean Minimum Maximum SO Moan Minimum Maximum SD 0 Artificial SoIVS 5 0.88000 0.60000 1.00000 0.17889 120587 0.88608 1.34528 020835 100 5 0.84000 0.60000 1.00000 0.16733 1.15819 0.88808 1.34528 0.19317 Graphics 0.1 Us 01 v:.. 0 100 - -2A -LS -LO 45 U 03 U t.0 IA 000-092-101.1 CEnSw vl.12revl Analyst I= Approval: .
Page 1 and 2: 0070470 SAF-RC-051 100 & 300 Area C
Page 3 and 4: G rrrbrr yb^ rrrm a r war M w a [pr
Page 5 and 6: CONTENTS Secdon Page INTRODUCTION..
Page 7 and 8: SAMPLE COLLECTION Individual soil s
Page 9 and 10: DATA ANALYSIS For each test chamber
Page 11 and 12: RESULTS AND Table 2 summarizes the
Page 13 and 14: CERTIFICATION STATEMENT I certify t
Page 15 and 16: BWfGRASS GROWTH TUT n,.er..1.eRAl.a
Page 17 and 18: CETIS Test Summary Pape 1 of 3 Repo
Page 19 and 20: CETIS Test Summary % Germination De
Page 21 and 22: CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 23 and 24: CETIS Analysis Detail Plant Bioassa
Page 25 and 26: MIS Analysis Detail Comparisons: Pa
Page 29 and 30: MIS Test Summa ry Page 1 of 3 Repor
Page 31 and 32: CETIS Test Summary % Gemination Det
Page 39 and 40: CETIS An alysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 41: CETIS Test Summary Pagel of 2 Repor
Page 47 and 48: Comparisons: Page 5of 7 Report Data
Page 51 and 52: CETIS Test Summary Page 1 of 3 Repo
Page 53 and 54: CETIS Test Summary %Germination Det
Page 59 and 60: CEM Analysis Detail Plant Bloassay
Page 63 and 64: Y Wo.w P. PAOIi A avP 8 a.pcw c Rwb
Page 65 and 66: CETIS Test Summary %Germination Sum
Page 77 and 78: CETIS Test Summary Pape 1 of 3 Repo
Page 79 and 80: CETIS Test Summa ry % Germination D
Page 81 and 82: CEfIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 83 and 84: MIS Analysis Detail Comparisons: Pa
Page 87 and 88: CETIS An alysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 89 and 90: 140.1. rorr,.. M1yATMA WpbY. Rw1wMC
Page 91 and 92: MIS Test Summary % Germination Summ
Page 93 and 94:
CETIS Analysis Detail Compa risons:
Page 95 and 96:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 97 and 98:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparlsonat
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
CETIS Analysis Detail Compa ri sons
Page 103 and 104:
CETIS Test Summa ry Page 1 of 2 Rep
Page 105 and 106:
CETIS Analysis Detail Plant Bloassa
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
CUIS Analysis Detail Comparisons: p
Page 111 and 112:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisons-
Page 113 and 114:
CETIS Test Summary Page 1 of 3 Repo
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
CETIS Analysis Detail Plant Bioassa
Page 121 and 122:
CETIS Analysis Detail Plant Bloassa
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
APPENDIX B CHAIN OF CUSTODY -122-
Page 127 and 128:
^, A901 WVashinzton Closure Hanford
Page 129 and 130:
£ A^kv& asllinaton Closure Hanford
Page 131 and 132:
6,2Y57 iWashin )3ton Closure Hanfor
Page 133 and 134:
NIAlshineton Closure Hanford CHAIN
Page 135 and 136:
July 20, 2006 ELR Inc. PROJECT MANA
Page 137 and 138:
BIOASSAY REPORT CHRONIC SCREENING B
Page 139 and 140:
INTRODUCTION CH2M HILL conducted ch
Page 141 and 142:
TEST 1MTIATION Tests were initiated
Page 143 and 144:
DATA ANALYSIS For each test chamber
Page 145 and 146:
ILaw2W ggggg IwwgW LIE ggg 8i0.^X C
Page 147 and 148:
APPENDIX A RAW DATA SHEETS -11-
Page 149 and 150:
--F^= 2 'Zto l M %Q7 01 0' b e' tv
Page 151 and 152:
CETIS Test Summary %Germination Sum
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
CUTS An alysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
CUIS Analysis Detail Comparisons: P
Page 161 and 162:
CEfIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
CETIS Test Summary %Germination Det
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
CETIS Analysis Detail Compar isons:
Page 171 and 172:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisonw.
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
ELUEARA760ROWrATl8T are wrMgm.cmm..
Page 177 and 178:
COS Test Summary Y. Germination Sum
Page 179 and 180:
CEfIS Analysis Detail Plant ant Com
Page 181 and 182:
Comparisons: Page 1 of 1 Report Dat
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Comparisons: Page 9ol 9 &32 AM CETI
Page 189 and 190:
CETIS Test Summary Pape 1 of 3 Repo
Page 191 and 192:
MIS Test Summary %Germination Detai
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
o.ne..rrw.^ ftOu A Aye a RyvrC _ R6
Page 203 and 204:
CETIS Test Summary % Germination Su
Page 205 and 206:
CUTS Analysis Detail Comparisons: P
Page 207 and 208:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparlsons:
Page 209 and 210:
CETIS Anarysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
CETIS Analysis Detail Plant Bioassa
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
CETIS Test Summary % Germination De
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
1I.r•+ 51e "%t 1xs+ur l.p/r,./ 1.
Page 229 and 230:
CETIS Test Summary % Germination Su
Page 231 and 232:
Comparisons: Pape 1 of 9 Report Dat
Page 233 and 234:
CETIS Analysis Detail. Comparisons:
Page 235 and 236:
CETIS Analysis Detail ' Comparisons
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
CET1S Test Summary Page 1 of 3 Repo
Page 243 and 244:
CETIS Test Summary %Germination Det
Page 245 and 246:
CEfIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 247 and 248:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:,
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
BLLMGRASS GROWTH TM lL a../ wwJYq..
Page 255 and 256:
CEfIS Test Summary %Germination Sum
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
CET{S Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
CETIS An alysis Detail Compariso ns
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
21 Ill 8ot ^Vasldnitton Closure Han
Page 269 and 270:
L• A 1y r. ) 7 E ?- ,a VI'1lshin
Page 271 and 272:
Washington Closure Hartford CHAIN O
Page 273 and 274:
IW 70 Washington Closure Hanford CH
show all

SAF-RC-051 100 & 300 Area Component. of the ... - Hanford Site

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?