SAF-RC-051 100 & 300 Area Component. of the ... - Hanford Site

More documents

Recommendations

Info

^•âal of +^.r-tea ^.+- ^'ira^ .•-r-n-^t.++- ..iilri --a..a ^.-••---.r.^n a ri W Ît . T"^9O^ fir_ ^"L wr wr W lhW 7ww t^ôwsr^ aaO^v.YOn ia•w$d* pw ..vm0 bmrawl wewm .tl....M O.aM.bwa aA.l.al^ n a4otl OaeMal ^^ ]a^76Y âon.Y YaA..I ow" ) bwa•.^.wl mom Oft Nw Kea Atl .Wn I asuft oam1611 ].IAIMY â4dA1 Y^Y Vsa...w.nYV w.d 4pw69aw..AMM+.P4 aa.oâ.d.^+6t S ^ 6 h h P7 P L z u h h £ ] s s .. . 71001 ^^ wM wn .avnl two 0 ~u V ul MOM& 7w] IONRMFM -Awd L uiw ^n 0 IDNia^(a9ed .. £o-a xgcw)caa ;d .mmmowMV.IGSal ^L7' waewn^ a o Y
CETIS Test Summary Pagel of 2 Report Date: 18 Ju408 222 PM Test Link 10.723745161B154203ps8 Plant Bioassay- Ctwonlc CH2M Hill Test No: 12-8841-7685 Test Type: PlanlChw1c; Duration: WA Start Date: , 25 Jan-08 Protocol: ASTM E1963.02 (2002) Species: Poa sandber9H Ending Date: DO Water. Source: Setup Dale: 25 Jan•06 Brinc Comments: recalculated Helgtd and Lerglhdata July 18, 2006 Sample No: 15-5457-5144 Code: B1542-03 Client: Sample Date: 14 Nov-05. Material: Son Project: Receive Data: Source: Hanford Sample Age: 72d Ob Station: Comments: J1oDT8, E253101 Comparison Summary Analysis Endpoint NOEL LOEL CAV PMSD Method 12-3597-7958 %Germination 100 2-100 WA 2260% Equal Variance tTwo•Sampte 12-1749-26" Average AG WI (Wet. mg) 100 > 100 WA 50.83% Equal Variance tTwo sample 05-2416-9275 Average AO Wt (Dry, mg) • 100 > 100 WA 63.25% Equal Variance tTwoSample 06.5621-9654 Average Root WL (Wei mg 100 > 100 NIA 55.58% Equal Vamarnce tTwo-Sample 015964-0324 Average Root WL (Dry, mg) 100 > 100 WA 61.46% Equal Variance tTwo-Sample 03.3064.1255 Average Total Wt (Wei ma 100 > 100 WA 51.72% Equal Variance t1wo-Sample 11831096105 Average Total Wt (Dry, mg) 100 :-100 WA 61.60% Equal Varlium t Two-Sample %Germination Summary Cone-1/6Control Type Reps Mean Minimum Maximum SE SD CV 0 A thficial soWS 5 0.88000 0.60000 1.00000 0.05000 0.17889 20.33% 100 5 0.84WO O.W= 1.00M 0.07483 0.18733 19.92% Average AG Wt (We%mW Surunary Cone.% Control Type Reps Moan Minimum Maximum SE SD CV 0 Artificial SOWS 5 63.903 41.475 82.338 7.1313 15.946 24.95% 100 5 90.868 60.345 151.71 15.946 35.657 3924% Average AO Wt (Dry. mg) Summary Conc-% ConlrolType Reps Mean Minimum Maximum SE SD CV 0 Artificial SONS 5 12.351 T.9275 19.275 2.1347 4.7733 38.65% 100 5 1&718 11.128 30.637 3.6185 8.0912 48.40% Ave" Root WL (Wet. mg) Summary Cone.% Control Type Reps Mean Minimum Maximum SE SO CV 0 Artificial SOWS 5 11323 51.836 15&52 21.449 47.962 42.38% 100 S 17214 121.90 270.5 211184 58.548 34.01% Average Rod WL (Dry, mg) Summary Cone-ye Control Type Reps Mean Minimum Maximum SE SD CV 0 Artificial SOWS 5 TJWA 3.78 14.108 1.8639 4.1678 5298% 100 5 10.003 6.05 16.423 1.5129 4.0535 40.52% Average Total Wt (We t. mg) Summary Cone-% Control Type Reps Mean Minimum. Maximum SE SD CV 0 Artificial SOWS 5 177.14 91113 240.66 2&088 58.331 3293% 100 5 263.01 195.11 42221 41.799 93.465 35.54% Average Total Wt (Dry, mg) Summary Cone-% Control Type Reps Mean Minimum Maximum SE SD CV 0 Artificial SOWS 5 20.217 12.221 33.384 3.9407 &8117 43.58% 100 5 26.721 17.177 47.060 5.4021 12.079 4521% 900-092.101-1 CETIS" vt1.2reA Anelysk-2Approval: -38-
Page 1 and 2: 0070470 SAF-RC-051 100 & 300 Area C
Page 3 and 4: G rrrbrr yb^ rrrm a r war M w a [pr
Page 5 and 6: CONTENTS Secdon Page INTRODUCTION..
Page 7 and 8: SAMPLE COLLECTION Individual soil s
Page 9 and 10: DATA ANALYSIS For each test chamber
Page 11 and 12: RESULTS AND Table 2 summarizes the
Page 13 and 14: CERTIFICATION STATEMENT I certify t
Page 15 and 16: BWfGRASS GROWTH TUT n,.er..1.eRAl.a
Page 17 and 18: CETIS Test Summary Pape 1 of 3 Repo
Page 19 and 20: CETIS Test Summary % Germination De
Page 21 and 22: CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 23 and 24: CETIS Analysis Detail Plant Bioassa
Page 25 and 26: MIS Analysis Detail Comparisons: Pa
Page 29 and 30: MIS Test Summa ry Page 1 of 3 Repor
Page 31 and 32: CETIS Test Summary % Gemination Det
Page 39: CETIS An alysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 47 and 48: Comparisons: Page 5of 7 Report Data
Page 51 and 52: CETIS Test Summary Page 1 of 3 Repo
Page 53 and 54: CETIS Test Summary %Germination Det
Page 59 and 60: CEM Analysis Detail Plant Bloassay
Page 63 and 64: Y Wo.w P. PAOIi A avP 8 a.pcw c Rwb
Page 65 and 66: CETIS Test Summary %Germination Sum
Page 77 and 78: CETIS Test Summary Pape 1 of 3 Repo
Page 79 and 80: CETIS Test Summa ry % Germination D
Page 81 and 82: CEfIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 83 and 84: MIS Analysis Detail Comparisons: Pa
Page 87 and 88: CETIS An alysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 89 and 90: 140.1. rorr,.. M1yATMA WpbY. Rw1wMC
Page 91 and 92:
MIS Test Summary % Germination Summ
Page 93 and 94:
CETIS Analysis Detail Compa risons:
Page 95 and 96:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 97 and 98:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparlsonat
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
CETIS Analysis Detail Compa ri sons
Page 103 and 104:
CETIS Test Summa ry Page 1 of 2 Rep
Page 105 and 106:
CETIS Analysis Detail Plant Bloassa
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
CUIS Analysis Detail Comparisons: p
Page 111 and 112:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisons-
Page 113 and 114:
CETIS Test Summary Page 1 of 3 Repo
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
CETIS Analysis Detail Plant Bioassa
Page 121 and 122:
CETIS Analysis Detail Plant Bloassa
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
APPENDIX B CHAIN OF CUSTODY -122-
Page 127 and 128:
^, A901 WVashinzton Closure Hanford
Page 129 and 130:
£ A^kv& asllinaton Closure Hanford
Page 131 and 132:
6,2Y57 iWashin )3ton Closure Hanfor
Page 133 and 134:
NIAlshineton Closure Hanford CHAIN
Page 135 and 136:
July 20, 2006 ELR Inc. PROJECT MANA
Page 137 and 138:
BIOASSAY REPORT CHRONIC SCREENING B
Page 139 and 140:
INTRODUCTION CH2M HILL conducted ch
Page 141 and 142:
TEST 1MTIATION Tests were initiated
Page 143 and 144:
DATA ANALYSIS For each test chamber
Page 145 and 146:
ILaw2W ggggg IwwgW LIE ggg 8i0.^X C
Page 147 and 148:
APPENDIX A RAW DATA SHEETS -11-
Page 149 and 150:
--F^= 2 'Zto l M %Q7 01 0' b e' tv
Page 151 and 152:
CETIS Test Summary %Germination Sum
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
CUTS An alysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
CUIS Analysis Detail Comparisons: P
Page 161 and 162:
CEfIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
CETIS Test Summary %Germination Det
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
CETIS Analysis Detail Compar isons:
Page 171 and 172:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisonw.
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
ELUEARA760ROWrATl8T are wrMgm.cmm..
Page 177 and 178:
COS Test Summary Y. Germination Sum
Page 179 and 180:
CEfIS Analysis Detail Plant ant Com
Page 181 and 182:
Comparisons: Page 1 of 1 Report Dat
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Comparisons: Page 9ol 9 &32 AM CETI
Page 189 and 190:
CETIS Test Summary Pape 1 of 3 Repo
Page 191 and 192:
MIS Test Summary %Germination Detai
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
o.ne..rrw.^ ftOu A Aye a RyvrC _ R6
Page 203 and 204:
CETIS Test Summary % Germination Su
Page 205 and 206:
CUTS Analysis Detail Comparisons: P
Page 207 and 208:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparlsons:
Page 209 and 210:
CETIS Anarysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
CETIS Analysis Detail Plant Bioassa
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
CETIS Test Summary % Germination De
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
1I.r•+ 51e "%t 1xs+ur l.p/r,./ 1.
Page 229 and 230:
CETIS Test Summary % Germination Su
Page 231 and 232:
Comparisons: Pape 1 of 9 Report Dat
Page 233 and 234:
CETIS Analysis Detail. Comparisons:
Page 235 and 236:
CETIS Analysis Detail ' Comparisons
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
CET1S Test Summary Page 1 of 3 Repo
Page 243 and 244:
CETIS Test Summary %Germination Det
Page 245 and 246:
CEfIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 247 and 248:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:,
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
BLLMGRASS GROWTH TM lL a../ wwJYq..
Page 255 and 256:
CEfIS Test Summary %Germination Sum
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
CET{S Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
CETIS An alysis Detail Compariso ns
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
21 Ill 8ot ^Vasldnitton Closure Han
Page 269 and 270:
L• A 1y r. ) 7 E ?- ,a VI'1lshin
Page 271 and 272:
Washington Closure Hartford CHAIN O
Page 273 and 274:
IW 70 Washington Closure Hanford CH
show all

SAF-RC-051 100 & 300 Area Component. of the ... - Hanford Site

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?