SAF-RC-051 100 & 300 Area Component. of the ... - Hanford Site

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Y L ., Mq 9 S 1 41, wyMOW IN Il . E 0011 a "-fftv So noT Ibhl $Y 210! 421 OA—W—" fS-0 101 L2 1 2 1 r w wLrM w iw omw* n # aAWM ••^••w• o•wr•dN MZiUM *Miw wmn ^ •O^ P^s.A OI 'M1w ^C^711'4^2^î7 a+o••a o.e+ew aw•w .ww.r rN••rrr aa..+aa•wd•awuO pued.wH "MM rw..n.rn &--A ON rws•n." a•wr+r t1 N4.M aô•d•u v.raru aarw•a•PVl•••InÔ sooa..1tnw •+•or• n .^ M 9.^r + t aw^m lr • 1 r ^ ..^ rwcas+^ 'E ia.ww..aurpwM.mh.. ^+naw•Lro-t • S QL L Z 1 ^ c L O f s£ -C8 Y r PMMd ^{ M^..e cs AWSUP O4'ip M4 •wnl w. e m r.r w•M+o ti) WNRAWa aa0.rau i'MGOUIM w•Mn tt! ur^nea lop= L4W 9Arffn 'lWdtA PL Y9W cNaamri O ara ho .ztiS^S 04M•r•. rp•M. sros•ô.rvta a a aQp ^[â ^K+.a" nda —nL•a`^—u La ^-9Am a/nw swvv1..0r4dm, o+nw 0"" atia "n KLMONO i.YM §= 0
CETIS Test Summary Page 1 of 3 Report Date: 18 JUM 229 PM Test Unk: 20-0117.847718754204psB Plant 8loassay-Chronic CH21111 Hill Test No: 07-0052-4534 Test Type: Plant Chronic Duration: WA Start Date: 25 Jan48 Protocol: ASTM E1963-02 (2002) Species: Poa sandbeigil Ending Date: Dill Water. Source Setup Date: 25Jan-W Brine: Comments: recalculated Height and Length data July 18, 2008 Sample Nor: 095315,2344 Code: 81562.04 ClienU Sample Date.. 15 Nov-05 Material: Sol Project: Receive Date: Source: Hanford Sample Age: 71d OA Station: Comments: J10DV2, E284601 Comparison Summary Analysis Endpoint NOEL LOEL CAV PMSD Method 041690-0445 %Germination 100 >100 WA . 29.92% Equal VarianceItTwoSample 08.29005287 Average Height (mm) 100 > 100 WA 19.39% Equal Valance tTwoSemple 1362433925 Average Length (mm) 100 > 100 WA 21.48% Equal Valence tTwo-Sample 08.75385589 Average AO Wt (Wet, mg) 100 >100 WA 22.90% Equal Vartence t Two-Sample 08-4708-2181 Average AO Wt (Dry, mg) 100 3,100 WA 3276% Equal Variance ITwo-Sample 13-2902-4325 Average RootWL (Wet mg 100 >100 WA 36.51% Equal Variance t Two-Sample 07-13989419 Average Roof WL (Dr)4 mg) 100 2.100 WA 44.15% Equal Valance t Two-Sample 17-2700.9201 Average Total Wt (Wet mg 100 100 WA 28.88% Equal Valance lTwuSample 07-7227-4367 Average Total Wt (Dry, mg) 100 100 WA 36.53% Equal Varlance (Two-Sample 004092401.1 CETISw v1.12revl Analyst 'Sr Approval: -48-
Page 1 and 2: 0070470 SAF-RC-051 100 & 300 Area C
Page 3 and 4: G rrrbrr yb^ rrrm a r war M w a [pr
Page 5 and 6: CONTENTS Secdon Page INTRODUCTION..
Page 7 and 8: SAMPLE COLLECTION Individual soil s
Page 9 and 10: DATA ANALYSIS For each test chamber
Page 11 and 12: RESULTS AND Table 2 summarizes the
Page 13 and 14: CERTIFICATION STATEMENT I certify t
Page 15 and 16: BWfGRASS GROWTH TUT n,.er..1.eRAl.a
Page 17 and 18: CETIS Test Summary Pape 1 of 3 Repo
Page 19 and 20: CETIS Test Summary % Germination De
Page 21 and 22: CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 23 and 24: CETIS Analysis Detail Plant Bioassa
Page 25 and 26: MIS Analysis Detail Comparisons: Pa
Page 29 and 30: MIS Test Summa ry Page 1 of 3 Repor
Page 31 and 32: CETIS Test Summary % Gemination Det
Page 39 and 40: CETIS An alysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 41 and 42: CETIS Test Summary Pagel of 2 Repor
Page 47 and 48: Comparisons: Page 5of 7 Report Data
Page 49: CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 53 and 54: CETIS Test Summary %Germination Det
Page 59 and 60: CEM Analysis Detail Plant Bloassay
Page 63 and 64: Y Wo.w P. PAOIi A avP 8 a.pcw c Rwb
Page 65 and 66: CETIS Test Summary %Germination Sum
Page 77 and 78: CETIS Test Summary Pape 1 of 3 Repo
Page 79 and 80: CETIS Test Summa ry % Germination D
Page 81 and 82: CEfIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 83 and 84: MIS Analysis Detail Comparisons: Pa
Page 87 and 88: CETIS An alysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 89 and 90: 140.1. rorr,.. M1yATMA WpbY. Rw1wMC
Page 91 and 92: MIS Test Summary % Germination Summ
Page 93 and 94: CETIS Analysis Detail Compa risons:
Page 97 and 98: CETIS Analysis Detail Comparlsonat
Page 99 and 100: CETIS Analysis Detail Compa risons:
Page 101 and 102:
CETIS Analysis Detail Compa ri sons
Page 103 and 104:
CETIS Test Summa ry Page 1 of 2 Rep
Page 105 and 106:
CETIS Analysis Detail Plant Bloassa
Page 107 and 108:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 109 and 110:
CUIS Analysis Detail Comparisons: p
Page 111 and 112:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisons-
Page 113 and 114:
CETIS Test Summary Page 1 of 3 Repo
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
CETIS Analysis Detail Plant Bioassa
Page 121 and 122:
CETIS Analysis Detail Plant Bloassa
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
APPENDIX B CHAIN OF CUSTODY -122-
Page 127 and 128:
^, A901 WVashinzton Closure Hanford
Page 129 and 130:
£ A^kv& asllinaton Closure Hanford
Page 131 and 132:
6,2Y57 iWashin )3ton Closure Hanfor
Page 133 and 134:
NIAlshineton Closure Hanford CHAIN
Page 135 and 136:
July 20, 2006 ELR Inc. PROJECT MANA
Page 137 and 138:
BIOASSAY REPORT CHRONIC SCREENING B
Page 139 and 140:
INTRODUCTION CH2M HILL conducted ch
Page 141 and 142:
TEST 1MTIATION Tests were initiated
Page 143 and 144:
DATA ANALYSIS For each test chamber
Page 145 and 146:
ILaw2W ggggg IwwgW LIE ggg 8i0.^X C
Page 147 and 148:
APPENDIX A RAW DATA SHEETS -11-
Page 149 and 150:
--F^= 2 'Zto l M %Q7 01 0' b e' tv
Page 151 and 152:
CETIS Test Summary %Germination Sum
Page 153 and 154:
CETIS Analysis Detail Compa risons:
Page 155 and 156:
CUTS An alysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
CUIS Analysis Detail Comparisons: P
Page 161 and 162:
CEfIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
CETIS Test Summary %Germination Det
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
CETIS Analysis Detail Compar isons:
Page 171 and 172:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisonw.
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
ELUEARA760ROWrATl8T are wrMgm.cmm..
Page 177 and 178:
COS Test Summary Y. Germination Sum
Page 179 and 180:
CEfIS Analysis Detail Plant ant Com
Page 181 and 182:
Comparisons: Page 1 of 1 Report Dat
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Comparisons: Page 9ol 9 &32 AM CETI
Page 189 and 190:
CETIS Test Summary Pape 1 of 3 Repo
Page 191 and 192:
MIS Test Summary %Germination Detai
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
o.ne..rrw.^ ftOu A Aye a RyvrC _ R6
Page 203 and 204:
CETIS Test Summary % Germination Su
Page 205 and 206:
CUTS Analysis Detail Comparisons: P
Page 207 and 208:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparlsons:
Page 209 and 210:
CETIS Anarysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
CETIS Analysis Detail Plant Bioassa
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
CETIS Test Summary % Germination De
Page 219 and 220:
CETIS Analysis Detail Compa risons:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
1I.r•+ 51e "%t 1xs+ur l.p/r,./ 1.
Page 229 and 230:
CETIS Test Summary % Germination Su
Page 231 and 232:
Comparisons: Pape 1 of 9 Report Dat
Page 233 and 234:
CETIS Analysis Detail. Comparisons:
Page 235 and 236:
CETIS Analysis Detail ' Comparisons
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
CET1S Test Summary Page 1 of 3 Repo
Page 243 and 244:
CETIS Test Summary %Germination Det
Page 245 and 246:
CEfIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 247 and 248:
CETIS Analysis Detail Comparisons:,
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
BLLMGRASS GROWTH TM lL a../ wwJYq..
Page 255 and 256:
CEfIS Test Summary %Germination Sum
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
CET{S Analysis Detail Comparisons:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
CETIS An alysis Detail Compariso ns
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
21 Ill 8ot ^Vasldnitton Closure Han
Page 269 and 270:
L• A 1y r. ) 7 E ?- ,a VI'1lshin
Page 271 and 272:
Washington Closure Hartford CHAIN O
Page 273 and 274:
IW 70 Washington Closure Hanford CH
show all

SAF-RC-051 100 & 300 Area Component. of the ... - Hanford Site

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?