22.02.2013 Views

An exercise in Stakeholder Analysis for a hypothetical offshore wind ...

An exercise in Stakeholder Analysis for a hypothetical offshore wind ...

An exercise in Stakeholder Analysis for a hypothetical offshore wind ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS EXERCISE<br />

2.3. Assessment of <strong>Stakeholder</strong>s <strong>for</strong> importance and <strong>in</strong>fluence.<br />

In the follow<strong>in</strong>g stage of the analysis, the degree of importance or <strong>in</strong>fluence of each<br />

stakeholder with regard to the envisaged project is gauged:<br />

• A stakeholder’s degree of <strong>in</strong>fluence translates <strong>in</strong>to the relative power he or she<br />

has over the project, as well as the degree to which he or she can help desired<br />

changes to be implemented or blocked. In broad terms, a stakeholder’s <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />

derives from his or her economic, social or political position, or his or her position<br />

<strong>in</strong> the hierarchy, although it can also often be someone with contacts or personal<br />

connections with other <strong>in</strong>fluential stakeholders.<br />

Other <strong>in</strong>dicators also have to be taken <strong>in</strong>to consideration when analys<strong>in</strong>g<br />

stakeholders’ <strong>in</strong>fluence: expert knowledge, negotiat<strong>in</strong>g capacity, charisma,<br />

strategic resource control, and so on.<br />

A stakeholder’s level of importance <strong>in</strong>dicates the extent to which a project would<br />

be <strong>in</strong>effective if his or her needs and expectations were not taken <strong>in</strong>to account.<br />

These two <strong>in</strong>dicators, <strong>in</strong>fluence and importance, are not the same. In comb<strong>in</strong>ation they<br />

not only provide <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation on how stakeholders act reciprocally, but can also help to<br />

identify assumptions and risk situations <strong>for</strong> the project.<br />

These relationships can be represented <strong>in</strong> a diagram which could help to identify<br />

potential risks to the project. It also allows stakeholders with similar needs to be grouped<br />

together.<br />

A stakeholder’s <strong>in</strong>terest or <strong>in</strong>fluence can be characterised by giv<strong>in</strong>g a grade <strong>in</strong> numbers<br />

(from 0 to 10) or by giv<strong>in</strong>g High (H), Medium (M) or Low (L) rat<strong>in</strong>gs. The follow<strong>in</strong>g figure<br />

provides a sample diagram:<br />

Figure 2. Importance-Influence classification<br />

Source: Smith, Larry W., 2000<br />

S1: <strong>Stakeholder</strong> X<br />

It can be seen that <strong>in</strong> the diagram stakeholders with the highest level on both <strong>in</strong>dicators,<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence and importance, are high-lighted aga<strong>in</strong>st a shaded background. This is<br />

because they are considered to be key stakeholders <strong>in</strong> the project. The stakeholders<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!