An exercise in Stakeholder Analysis for a hypothetical offshore wind ...
An exercise in Stakeholder Analysis for a hypothetical offshore wind ...
An exercise in Stakeholder Analysis for a hypothetical offshore wind ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS EXERCISE<br />
The follow<strong>in</strong>g box conta<strong>in</strong>s a checklist of questions to check assumptions about risks.<br />
Box 2. Checklist <strong>for</strong> elicit<strong>in</strong>g assumptions about (and risks<br />
deriv<strong>in</strong>g from) stakeholders.<br />
• What is the role or response of the key stakeholder<br />
that must be assumed if the project is to be<br />
successful?<br />
• are these roles plausible and realistic?<br />
• are there negative responses which can be<br />
expected, given the <strong>in</strong>terests of the stakeholder?<br />
• if such responses occur, what impact would they<br />
have on the project?<br />
• how probable are these negative responses, and are<br />
they major risks?<br />
• <strong>in</strong> summary, which plausible assumptions about<br />
stakeholders support or threaten the project?<br />
Source: Overseas Development Adm<strong>in</strong>istration, 1999.<br />
2.5. Def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>Stakeholder</strong> participation<br />
Once stakeholders’ <strong>in</strong>terests have been <strong>in</strong>terpreted, we need to evaluate their degree of<br />
participation and the <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation they require.<br />
Not all stakeholders need to be <strong>in</strong>volved at all stages or <strong>in</strong> all aspects of the project.<br />
The <strong>Stakeholder</strong> <strong>An</strong>alysis has put us <strong>in</strong> a position where we have been able to identify<br />
groups with similar <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation needs. We can use the classification to prepare an<br />
<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation report about the project to which we can also attach a breakdown of<br />
communication procedure costs.<br />
The participation matrix methodology proposed <strong>in</strong> Figure 3 can be an aid to project<br />
managers categoris<strong>in</strong>g the strategy <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g stakeholders.<br />
The life cycle stages show the different stages of the project. The types of participation<br />
are generic and suggest stakeholder procedures that can be determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the project<br />
team. As such, they can be adapted to the envisaged project.<br />
14