23.02.2013 Views

Serbia Handbook for Legal Aid Providers Final

Serbia Handbook for Legal Aid Providers Final

Serbia Handbook for Legal Aid Providers Final

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Under the applicable law in Kosovo and Metohija, court fees are required in several<br />

instances (i.e. where the claimant is demanding monetary compensation). The same law<br />

allows <strong>for</strong> the court to waive such fees upon the request of a claimant if he/she can prove<br />

that he/she is indigent.<br />

Previously under the Law on Court Fees (OG SAPK 12/79) (Art 17), the exemption from the<br />

obligation to pay court fees should be granted based on the rules set <strong>for</strong>th by the provisions<br />

of the Law on Contested Procedure (OG SAPK 4/77). It prescribed that the responsible<br />

court should make a decision on the request of the party to be exempted based on the<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation on his/her financial status (Article 172 Para 1).<br />

In 2008 UNMIK drafted an Administrative Directive whereby the Kosovo Judicial Council<br />

(KJC) would uni<strong>for</strong>m the court fees in Kosovo and Metohija. 10 In November 2008 the KJC<br />

published an Administrative Instruction on Court Fees. Section 7 of this regulation deals<br />

specifically with the waiver of court fees <strong>for</strong> indigent persons. Section 7.2(b) is particular<br />

interesting in it’s wording; “the judge assigned to the case shall presume that a person<br />

cannot af<strong>for</strong>d to pay a fee... The person can provide evidence that he or she is receiving<br />

legal aid from a District <strong>Legal</strong> <strong>Aid</strong> Bureau.” This refers to legal aid <strong>for</strong>mally established by<br />

UNMIK Regulation 2006/36, however it would be prudent <strong>for</strong> the legal aid lawyer to argue<br />

that the recipient of legal aid from the Project should be entitled equally under the law to the<br />

protections provided <strong>for</strong> persons receiving institutionalized legal aid.<br />

Getting international judges appointed to a case<br />

There have been a number of times where clients request that their cases be heard by<br />

international judges. The primary reasons <strong>for</strong> such requests revolve around a lack of<br />

confidence in the local judiciary in being objective.<br />

There are pros and cons to bear in mind when deciding whether to request an international<br />

judge in a case.<br />

Pros<br />

- Non-biased review of case<br />

- Professional judgments<br />

- Limited intimidation of judge by outside influence 11<br />

Cons<br />

- Long wait <strong>for</strong> translations (weeks/months)<br />

- Lack of understanding by international judges of local laws<br />

- Frequent transition of international judges out of mission<br />

- Slower processing of case<br />

- Difficult to meet judges<br />

- Translation difficulties at hearings<br />

The process in requesting an international judge is straight<strong>for</strong>ward and is outlined in UNMIK<br />

Regulation 2000/64, Section 1.1 and 2000/6. While the laws refer to criminal cases, the<br />

courts have inferred this to include civil cases as well, given the similar pressures that local<br />

judges can face in such cases as much as in criminal cases. It is recommended that the<br />

request be in the name of the client, and if possible, accompanied with a supporting letter by<br />

10 UNMIK Regulation 2008/4 Section 2.<br />

11 See OSCE Report; Intimidation of the Judiciary: Security of Judges and Prosecutors, April 2010<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!