23.02.2013 Views

Serbia Handbook for Legal Aid Providers Final

Serbia Handbook for Legal Aid Providers Final

Serbia Handbook for Legal Aid Providers Final

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The opinions of the Advisory Panel will be submitted to the SRSG. The SRSG then decides<br />

whether and how to act on the findings and recommendations of the Advisory Panel. The<br />

decisions and opinions of the Advisory Panel as well as the decisions of the SRSG will be<br />

made public. Previous legal aid projects have been successful in obtaining a decision in<br />

their favour by the HRAP.<br />

Practical Points to keep in mind when presenting cases be<strong>for</strong>e the HRAP<br />

Use of Language<br />

The committee has made it clear that they are limited in resources. The Committee will<br />

accept claims and documents in <strong>Serbia</strong>n, Albanian and English. However, in reality the<br />

translation process will slow down the processing of the claim by up to several<br />

weeks/months. It is better to submit claims with translation of supporting documents to<br />

English, if possible, to expedite the process.<br />

Persuasive authority and dicta<br />

The judges of the HRAP indicated that citing the European Convention of Human Rights<br />

articles and case-law of previous similar cases would certainly help the case submitted<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e them. Advocates should include as part of their argument such cases and clearly<br />

state which right has been violated according the ECHR.<br />

Relevant case law be<strong>for</strong>e the Human Rights Advisory Panel that would be of assistance to<br />

lawyers providing assistance to IDPs as precedential authority includes the case of Miligoric<br />

et al. It is important to note that the HRAP decisions are only advisory, and it does not have<br />

the authority to execute these decisions.<br />

Filing claims against KFOR<br />

In cases involving property occupied by KFOR the process gets very complicated, due to<br />

the immunities from any legal process provided to KFOR under UNMIK Regulation 2000/47.<br />

Each contingent follows its own rules <strong>for</strong> compensation claims where KFOR has usurped<br />

property. Persons with claims against the larger contingents (e.g. France, U.S., Germany)<br />

will need to file a claim directly with those <strong>for</strong>ces at their main bases.<br />

Client filed a claim at French KFOR HQ <strong>for</strong> occupation of her shop by French <strong>for</strong>ces. The<br />

claim is <strong>for</strong>warded to Paris where a decision on whether to provide compensation is<br />

made. If the client receives an unfavorable verdict, she can appeal to a three (3) person<br />

panel comprised of a local, a representative of French KFOR and a representative from<br />

the French government. The panel is advisory and must be unanimous in order <strong>for</strong> their<br />

decision to be sent to Paris. Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, the French government rep is duty bound to<br />

follow instructions from HQ in Paris.<br />

Clients who have claims against smaller contingents (e.g. Czech) will need to have his/her<br />

claim filed at the KFOR headquarters located in “Film City” in Pristina. The office is called<br />

the “Izmir” building and is located at the entrance to the compound. Further in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong><br />

property claims with KFOR at 038 503 603 ext 2793, mobile 044/310-185. Other questions<br />

of a legal nature can be addressed to the legal unit of KFOR at ext 2087.<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!