23.02.2013 Views

Serbia Handbook for Legal Aid Providers Final

Serbia Handbook for Legal Aid Providers Final

Serbia Handbook for Legal Aid Providers Final

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Thus, when a legal officer discovers evidence of government actors treating an individual or<br />

group less favourably than another individual or group where both parties are in a<br />

comparable situation, he/she should apply the following test to determine if discrimination<br />

has occurred:<br />

DIFFERING TREATMENT? - Has an individual or group of individuals been treated<br />

differently (i.e. less favourably) by governmental authorities than others who are in a<br />

comparable position? (If “yes”, go the next step; if “no” there is no arbitrary discrimination)<br />

IS THERE A LEGITIMATE AIM? - Does the State have a legitimate aim in treating the<br />

individual or group of individuals differently i.e. does the state have a reasonable and<br />

objective justification <strong>for</strong> the differing treatment, considering the aim of the differing<br />

treatment and the effect that it will have? (If “yes” then go to the next step; if “no” then there<br />

is arbitrary discrimination in violation of art. 14 of the ECHR)<br />

ARE THE MEASURES THE STATE EMPLOYS TO ACHIEVE THE AIM<br />

PROPORTIONATE? - Even if the State does have a legitimate aim in treating individuals or<br />

groups of individuals differently, are the means use proportionate to the aim to be<br />

achieved? . Thus, under international human rights standards, the State can restrict an<br />

individual’s or a group of individuals’ rights only so much as is necessary to achieve a<br />

legitimate objective, AND NO MORE. (If the answer is “yes, it’s proportionate” there is not<br />

arbitrary discrimination. But if the measures that the State takes are not proportionate [i.e.<br />

they are more than is necessary to achieve a legitimate aim], then a case of arbitrary<br />

discrimination has been established.<br />

Assessing<br />

Discrimination<br />

Prohibited grounds include ethnicity, race, religion, nationality, language, social origin,<br />

birth, property, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, mental or physical disability.<br />

However, the categories of prohibited grounds are not closed and may include other similar<br />

or analogous grounds. Those could include family status as example. The complainant<br />

may self-identify with one or more vulnerable groups.<br />

Protected activities include employment and vocational training, membership in and<br />

Employment organization (such as guild or trade union), education, housing, health and<br />

social welfare, welfare, access to goods and services, access to public places, personal<br />

security, participation in public affairs (such as voting or standing <strong>for</strong> office) and fair<br />

treatment by the courts.<br />

The Complaint Format<br />

TEST FOR IDENTIFYING ARBITRARY DISCRIMINATION<br />

No<br />

Discrimination<br />

Different<br />

Treatmen<br />

t?<br />

Yes<br />

Discrimination<br />

Legitimat<br />

e Aim<br />

Discrimination<br />

No No No<br />

Yes Yes<br />

Proportional<br />

No<br />

Discrimination<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!