24.02.2013 Views

RANDOM FIELDS AND THEIR GEOMETRY

RANDOM FIELDS AND THEIR GEOMETRY

RANDOM FIELDS AND THEIR GEOMETRY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

16 1. Random fields<br />

1.4.2 Moving averages<br />

We now return to the main setting of this Section, in which T is an Abelian<br />

group under the binary operation + and − represents inversion. Let ν be<br />

a Haar measure on (T, T ) (assumed to be σ-finite) and take F : T → R in<br />

L2 (ν). If W is a ν-noise on T , then the random process<br />

f(t) ∆ �<br />

(1.4.12)<br />

= F (t − s) W (ds),<br />

T<br />

is called a moving average of W , and we have the following simple result:<br />

Lemma 1.4.1 Under the preceeding conditions, f is a stationary random<br />

field on T . Furthermore, if W is a Gaussian noise, then f is also Gaussian.<br />

Proof. To establish stationarity we must prove that<br />

E {f(t)f(s)} = C(t − s)<br />

for some C. However, from (1.4.11) and the invariance of ν under the group<br />

operation,<br />

�<br />

E {f(t)f(s)} = F (t − u)F (s − u) ν(du)<br />

T �<br />

= F (t − s + v)F (v) ν(dv)<br />

T<br />

∆<br />

= C(t − s),<br />

and we are done.<br />

If W is Gaussian, then we have already noted when defining stochastic<br />

integrals that f(t) = W (F (t−·)) is a real-valued Gaussian random variable<br />

for each t. The same arguments also show that f is Gaussian as a process. ✷<br />

A similar but slightly more sophisticated construction also yields a more<br />

general class of examples, in which we think of the elements g of a group<br />

G acting on the elements t of an underlying space T . This will force us to<br />

change notation a little and, for the argument to be appreciated in full, to<br />

assume that you also know a little about manifolds. If you do not, then you<br />

can return to this example later, after having read Chapter 3, or simply<br />

take the manifold to be RN . In either case, you may still want to read the<br />

very concrete and quite simple examples at the end of this subsection now.<br />

Thus, taking the elements g of a group G acting on the elements t of an<br />

underlying space T , we denote the identity element of G by e and the left<br />

and right multiplication maps by Lg and Rg. We also write Ig = Lg ◦ R−1 g<br />

for the inner automorphism of G induced by g.<br />

Since we are now working in more generality, we shall also drop the commutativity<br />

assumption that has been in force so far. This necessitates some

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!