24.02.2013 Views

RANDOM FIELDS AND THEIR GEOMETRY

RANDOM FIELDS AND THEIR GEOMETRY

RANDOM FIELDS AND THEIR GEOMETRY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

44 2. Gaussian fields<br />

Corollary 2.1.4 Under the conditions of Theorem 2.1.3 there exists a universal<br />

constant K such that<br />

(2.1.8)<br />

E {ωf,d(δ)} ≤ K<br />

� δ<br />

0<br />

H 1/2 (ε) dε.<br />

Note that this is not quite enough to establish the a.s. continuity of<br />

f. Continuity is, however, not far away, since the same construction used<br />

to prove Theorem 2.1.3 will also give us the following, which, with the<br />

elementary tools we have at hand at the moment 6 , neither follows from,<br />

nor directly implies, (2.1.8).<br />

Theorem 2.1.5 Under the conditions of Theorem 2.1.3 there exists a random<br />

η ∈ (0, ∞) and a universal constant K such that<br />

(2.1.9)<br />

for all δ < η.<br />

ωf,d(δ) ≤ K<br />

� δ<br />

0<br />

H 1/2 (ε) dε,<br />

Note that (2.1.9) is expressed in terms of the d modulus of continuity.<br />

Translating this to a result for the τ modulus is trivial.<br />

We shall see later that if f is stationary then the convergence of the<br />

entropy integral is also necessary for continuity and that continuity and<br />

boundedness always occur together (Theorem 2.6.4). Now, however, we<br />

shall prove Theorems 2.1.3 and 2.1.5 following the approach of Talagrand<br />

[92]. The original proof of Theorem 2.1.5 is due to Dudley [26], and, in<br />

fact, things have not really changed very much since then. Immediately<br />

following the proofs, in Section 2.2, we shall look at examples, to see how<br />

entropy arguments work in practice. You may want to skip to the examples<br />

before going through the proofs first time around.<br />

We start with the following almost trivial, but important, observations.<br />

Observation 2.1.6 If f is a separable process on T then sup t∈T ft is a<br />

well defined (i.e. measurable) random variable.<br />

Measurability follows directly from Definition 1.1.3 of separability which<br />

gave us a countable dense subset D ⊂ T for which<br />

sup<br />

t∈T<br />

ft = sup ft.<br />

t∈D<br />

The supremum of a countable set of measurable random variables is always<br />

measurable.<br />

One can actually manage without separability for the rest of this Section,<br />

in which case<br />

sup<br />

�<br />

E<br />

�<br />

sup ft<br />

t∈F<br />

�<br />

�<br />

: F ⊂ T, F finite<br />

6 See, however Theorem ?? below, to see what one can do with better tools.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!