24.02.2013 Views

RANDOM FIELDS AND THEIR GEOMETRY

RANDOM FIELDS AND THEIR GEOMETRY

RANDOM FIELDS AND THEIR GEOMETRY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

28 1. Random fields<br />

Proof. Isotropy implies that C can be written as a function on R+ only.<br />

Let τ be any positive real. We shall show that C(τ) ≥ −C(0)/N.<br />

Choose any t1, . . . , tN+1 in R N for which |ti − tj| = τ for all i �= j. Then,<br />

by (1.4.38),<br />

⎧�<br />

�<br />

⎨�N+1<br />

2<br />

�<br />

� �<br />

�<br />

E � X(tk) �<br />

⎩�<br />

�<br />

⎫ ⎬<br />

= (N + 1)[C(0) + C(τ)].<br />

⎭<br />

k=1<br />

Since this must be positive, the result follows. ✷<br />

The restriction of isotropy also has significant simplifying consequences<br />

for the spectral measure ν of (1.4.16). Let θ : RN → RN be a rotation, so<br />

that |θ(t)| = |t| for all t. Isotropy then implies C(t) = C(θ(t)) and so the<br />

Spectral Distribution Theorem implies<br />

�<br />

RN e i〈t,λ〉 �<br />

ν(dλ) =<br />

RN e i〈θ(t),λ〉 (1.4.39)<br />

ν(dλ)<br />

�<br />

=<br />

RN e i〈t,θ(λ)〉 ν(dλ)<br />

�<br />

= e i〈t,λ〉 νθ(dλ),<br />

where νθ is the push-forward of ν by θ defined by νθ(A) = ν(θ −1 A). Since<br />

the above holds for all t it follows that ν ≡ νθ; i.e. ν, like C, is invariant<br />

under rotation. Furthermore, if ν is absolutely continuous, then its density<br />

is also dependent only on the modulus of its argument.<br />

An interesting consequence of this symmetry is that an isotropic field<br />

cannot have all the probability of its spectral measure concentrated in one<br />

small region in R N away from the origin. In particular, it is not possible<br />

to have a spectral measure degenerate at one point, unless that point is<br />

the origin. The closest the spectral measure of an isotropic field can come<br />

to this sort of behaviour is to have all its probability concentrated in an<br />

annulus of the form<br />

{λ ∈ R N : a ≤ |λ| ≤ b}.<br />

In such a case it is clear from (1.4.26) and (1.4.27) that the field itself<br />

is then composed of a ‘sum’ of waves travelling in all directions but with<br />

wavelengths between 2π/b and 2π/a only.<br />

Another consequence of isotropy is the the spherical symmetry of the<br />

spectral measure significantly simplifies the structure of the spectral moments<br />

and so the correlations between various derivatives of f. In particular,<br />

it follows immediately from (1.4.34) that<br />

(1.4.40)<br />

R N<br />

E {fi(t)fj(t)} = −E {f(t)fij(t)} = λ2δij

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!