24.02.2013 Views

RANDOM FIELDS AND THEIR GEOMETRY

RANDOM FIELDS AND THEIR GEOMETRY

RANDOM FIELDS AND THEIR GEOMETRY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

46 2. Gaussian fields<br />

By this and (2.1.10), it follows that<br />

(2.1.13)<br />

�<br />

��fπj(t) �<br />

P − f �<br />

πj−1(t) ≥<br />

�<br />

r/ √ � �<br />

−j<br />

2<br />

≤ exp<br />

�<br />

−(r/ √ 2) −2j<br />

2(2r−j+1 ) 2<br />

�<br />

= exp � −2 j /8r 2� ,<br />

which is emminently summable. By Borel-Cantelli, and recalling that r ≥ 2,<br />

we have that the sum in (2.1.11) converges absolutely, with probability one.<br />

We now start the main part of the proof. Define<br />

Mj = NjNj−1, aj = 2 3/2 r −j+1<br />

�<br />

ln(2j−iMj), S = �<br />

aj.<br />

Then Mj is the maximum number of possible pairs (πj(t), πj−1(t)) as t<br />

varies through T and aj was chosen so as to make later formulae simplify.<br />

Applying (2.1.12) once again, we have, for all u > 0,<br />

(2.1.14)<br />

and so<br />

P � �<br />

∃ t ∈ T : fπj(t) − fπj−1(t) > uaj ≤ Mj exp<br />

�<br />

P sup ft − fto<br />

t∈T<br />

�<br />

≥ uS<br />

For u > 1 this is at most<br />

� � j−i<br />

2 �−u 2<br />

j>i<br />

≤ �<br />

Mj exp<br />

j>i<br />

= �<br />

j>i<br />

Mj<br />

j>i<br />

� −u 2 a 2 j<br />

2(2r −j+1 ) 2<br />

� −u 2 a 2 j<br />

2(2r −j+1 ) 2<br />

� � 2<br />

j−i −u<br />

2 Mj .<br />

≤ 2 −u2 �<br />

2 j−i+1<br />

j>i<br />

= 2 · 2 −u2<br />

.<br />

The basic relationship that, for non-negative random variables X,<br />

E{X} =<br />

� ∞<br />

0<br />

P{X ≥ u} du,<br />

together with the observation that supt∈T (ft − fto ) ≥ 0 since to<br />

immediately yields<br />

∈ T ,<br />

� �<br />

(2.1.15)<br />

E ≤ KS,<br />

sup ft<br />

t∈T<br />

�<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!