25.02.2013 Views

FEBRUARY 2006 £3.80 - Index of

FEBRUARY 2006 £3.80 - Index of

FEBRUARY 2006 £3.80 - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the popularity <strong>of</strong> the Simpson<br />

260 multimeter (on Ebay, at<br />

least) must be that it’s still<br />

being used in aircraft maintenance.<br />

In fact, a number <strong>of</strong><br />

Boeing aircraft maintenance<br />

documents mention the use <strong>of</strong><br />

the Simpson Model 260!<br />

Christian Wendt (Germany)<br />

Retronics on multimeters<br />

(2)<br />

We thank Mr. Reznor <strong>of</strong><br />

Solihull for sending us a copy<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Philips PM241 multimeter<br />

service documentation<br />

and user manual, as well as<br />

for confirming that the instrument<br />

was first sold in 1971.<br />

The user manual confirmed<br />

our assumptions about the<br />

use <strong>of</strong> the strange ‘I/0.4’<br />

pushbutton on the range<br />

switch <strong>of</strong> the PM241 and its<br />

successor model the<br />

PM2411.<br />

Improved DECT battery<br />

charger<br />

Dear Editor — I’d like to<br />

respond to your Summer<br />

Circuits item entitled<br />

‘Improved DECT Battery<br />

Charger’. Basically, your<br />

story is correct and it is desirable<br />

to reduce the charge<br />

current <strong>of</strong> NiCd batteries on<br />

permanent charging to levels<br />

even smaller than 0.1 C. So<br />

I decided to have a go at my<br />

own DECT set.<br />

The charger with the set<br />

looks a bit different and consist<br />

<strong>of</strong> a current source built<br />

from a diode and a transistor,<br />

the latter supplying about<br />

30 mA. The batteries in the<br />

phone are 280 mAh types. I<br />

reduced the current to about<br />

18 mA (approx. 0.065 C)<br />

by increasing the value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

resistor in the current source.<br />

The result: flat batteries after<br />

about two weeks. It then<br />

occurred to me that the<br />

phone itself also draws current<br />

when placed in the<br />

charger pod. So, in my case,<br />

the manufacturer did manage<br />

to design a proper charger.<br />

Nico de Vries (Netherlands)<br />

A valid point Nico that should be<br />

taken into account when dimensioning<br />

the charge current.<br />

Thanks for letting us know.<br />

Elektor Year Volume<br />

CD-ROM problems<br />

Dear Jan — I am unfortunately<br />

unable to install the Elektor<br />

annual CD-ROM.<br />

After running Setup, I get the<br />

error report:<br />

16-bit Windows subsystem<br />

C:\winnt\system32\autoexec.nt<br />

System file unsuitable<br />

for ms dos and Micros<strong>of</strong>t<br />

applications.<br />

Next, when I run<br />

EASETUP.EXE, something is<br />

being installed and I am<br />

informed that the installation<br />

is successful. However, when<br />

starting the Archive program<br />

I once again get the above<br />

error report telling me the<br />

system file is unsuitable. I am<br />

using Windows 2000<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional. Can you help,<br />

please?<br />

K. Johnson (UK)<br />

We not only know the error<br />

report, we also have the solution<br />

to the problem.<br />

From the directory<br />

‘c:\winnt\repair’ copy the file<br />

‘autoexec.nt’ and paste it into the<br />

‘winnt\system32’ directory (i.e.,<br />

Xmas Special edition<br />

(1)<br />

Dear Editor — I have just<br />

received the December<br />

2005 edition <strong>of</strong> Elektor<br />

Electronics magazine<br />

and the articles make,<br />

as usual, very interesting<br />

reading.<br />

However, I am disappointed.<br />

Your previous<br />

December issues carried the<br />

Xmas Special 30 circuits<br />

and design ideas for the<br />

Xmas holidays. These are<br />

missing this year and I feel<br />

you have let us down. I<br />

hope to see them again in<br />

next year’s Xmas edition.<br />

Ken Barry (UK)<br />

Xmas Special edition<br />

(2)<br />

Dear Jan — what happened<br />

to the circuit supplement in<br />

the December issue?<br />

I always looked forward to<br />

these idea-provoking small<br />

projects. I was disappointed<br />

to find the supplement missing<br />

from the December issue<br />

after 15 years with no<br />

explanation or statement<br />

that the feature had been<br />

suspended.<br />

As a result <strong>of</strong> this, the magazine<br />

seemed a bit ‘thin’ for<br />

articles. I do not expect<br />

every issue to be full <strong>of</strong> articles<br />

or projects that are <strong>of</strong><br />

interest to me, if that were<br />

so, I would not have been a<br />

subscriber since 1978.<br />

Generally Elektor does very<br />

well to provide a varied mix<br />

<strong>of</strong> interesting and useful articles<br />

and projects, written by<br />

some excellent contributors<br />

and staff writers. So this letter<br />

is not intended as a criticism<br />

<strong>of</strong> the magazine, more<br />

as to observe that a feature<br />

has disappeared without a<br />

word <strong>of</strong> explanation after<br />

being enjoyed for so long.<br />

Please bring back our supplement<br />

!!<br />

Pat Redway (UK)<br />

Thanks Ken, Pat and other readers<br />

who wrote us on the same subject.<br />

There are no longer 30+<br />

small circuits<br />

in the December issue<br />

because all 100+ we produce in a<br />

year have been included in the<br />

‘Summer Circuits’ issue. At 144<br />

pages the 2005 Summer Circuits<br />

edition was the thickest issue <strong>of</strong><br />

Elektor Electronics ever printed.<br />

So, we have not let our readers<br />

down and in fact have again<br />

published more articles in a year<br />

volume than any <strong>of</strong> our competitors<br />

on newsstand distribution in<br />

the UK.<br />

Starting in 1988 and ending in<br />

2004 (and only in the Englishlanguage<br />

version <strong>of</strong> Elektor), 60-<br />

70 articles from our annual stock<br />

went into the July/August (‘Summer<br />

Circuits’) issue, and the<br />

remaining 30-35, into the<br />

December issue. Due to centralized<br />

production and simultaneous<br />

printing <strong>of</strong> all four-language<br />

editions <strong>of</strong> Elektor, in 2005 we<br />

changed this to 100+ articles in<br />

the July/August issue, thereby<br />

restoring an Elektor tradition in<br />

existence between 1975 (the<br />

year <strong>of</strong> our first issue) and 1987.<br />

The change was duly<br />

announced in the June 2005<br />

magazine as well as in several<br />

news items on our website;,<br />

sorry if you missed these. I am<br />

pleased to say that we had an<br />

encouraging amount <strong>of</strong> positive<br />

feedback in response to the<br />

return <strong>of</strong> the 100+ items version<br />

<strong>of</strong> the ‘Summer Circuits’ issue.<br />

The change was rewarded with<br />

newsstand sales figures nearly<br />

10% up as compared with the<br />

previous year.<br />

Besides articles in good Christmas<br />

spirit, the December 2005<br />

issue contains four major construction<br />

articles and three<br />

design tips which, I hope, have<br />

kept many readers busy over<br />

the Christmas holidays.<br />

2/<strong>2006</strong> - elektor electronics 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!