26.02.2013 Views

Appendix A - Washington State Department of Ecology

Appendix A - Washington State Department of Ecology

Appendix A - Washington State Department of Ecology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

October 21, 2008<br />

Final December 2010<br />

The emission rates modeled were derived from operating records <strong>of</strong> the rotary kiln and reflect<br />

the highest 24-hour emission rate within the three years that were modeled. The emission<br />

reduction percentages (see table above) were applied to this maximum 24-hour emission rate and<br />

those rates were then used for modeling the visibility impairment/improvement that could be<br />

achieved using the proposed controls. The maximum day SO2 emissions during the three years<br />

<strong>of</strong> modeling were not used as that day was reported to be in an abnormal, upset operating<br />

condition. In reviewing the emission information, it is also unusually high compared to all other<br />

monitored days in the 3-year period. The modeled emission rates are shown in Table 3-1.<br />

<strong>Ecology</strong> modelers have reviewed the modeling performed by Lafarge and have found that the<br />

modeling complies with the Modeling Protocol and produces a reasonable result.<br />

The modeled emission reductions result in substantial reduction in the visibility impairment<br />

caused by Lafarge in all Class I areas modeled and in the Columbia River Gorge NSA. At the<br />

three most heavily impacted Class I areas, Olympic National Park, Mt. Rainier National Park,<br />

and the Alpine Lakes Wilderness, Lafarge’s proposed BART controls would provide 0.8 to 1 dv<br />

reduction in visibility impairment in each <strong>of</strong> these areas.<br />

L - 239

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!