26.02.2013 Views

Appendix A - Washington State Department of Ecology

Appendix A - Washington State Department of Ecology

Appendix A - Washington State Department of Ecology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Blain, Lindsay (ECY)<br />

From: Site Administrator [npca@npca.org] on behalf <strong>of</strong> Cesia Kearns [cesia.kearns@sierraclub.org]<br />

Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 1:15 PM<br />

To: ECY RE AQComments<br />

Subject: Comments on <strong>Washington</strong>'s Proposed Regional Haze <strong>State</strong> Implementation Plan<br />

Categories: General Comment<br />

Sep 13, 2010<br />

Mr. Alan Newman<br />

Air Quality Program, Wash. Dept. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ecology</strong> P.O. Box 47600<br />

Lacey, WA 98504‐7600<br />

Dear Mr. Newman,<br />

The beauty and solace <strong>of</strong>fered by the Northwest's special places are<br />

very important to me, but sadly they are being threatened by dirty<br />

coal.<br />

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on <strong>Washington</strong>'s Regional Haze<br />

<strong>State</strong> Implementation Plan (SIP) to address haze pollution including<br />

that emitted by TransAlta's coal‐fired power plant in Centralia,<br />

<strong>Washington</strong>. As a national park lover and advocate for our national<br />

parks, I treasure the beauty and pristine air quality <strong>of</strong> North<br />

Cascades, Mount Rainier, and Olympic National Parks and recognize that<br />

with a strong SIP, the state <strong>of</strong> <strong>Washington</strong> has a unique opportunity to<br />

protect these and other treasured public spaces.<br />

Unfortunately, the SIP as proposed is unacceptably weak. In order to<br />

preserve these parks for present and future generations, the state must<br />

revise its plan to better protect state and regional air quality. I<br />

believe the SIP should be improved in the following respects:<br />

‐‐<strong>Washington</strong>'s plan should not allow the air quality in North Cascades<br />

National Park and Glacier Peak Wilderness to get worse.<br />

‐‐<strong>Washington</strong> must consider pollution controls for TransAlta's nitrogen<br />

oxide emissions that would reduce pollution by 90% or more over its<br />

current proposal.<br />

‐‐<strong>Washington</strong> must consider the total impact a pollution source like<br />

TransAlta would have on all twelve protected public lands it impairs<br />

and require emission reductions to protect all <strong>of</strong> them.<br />

‐‐Air pollution in <strong>Washington</strong> is projected to increase by 2018, but the<br />

state says it is making progress towards eliminating haze‐pollution.<br />

This conclusion is inconsistent with actual projections.<br />

‐‐<strong>Washington</strong>'s plan must get rid <strong>of</strong> haze pollution in Olympic National<br />

Park by no later than 2064, but as currently written the plan will<br />

allow hazy air at Olympic for 323 more years!<br />

The Clean Air Act requires power plants to reduce haze causing<br />

pollutants, including nitrogen oxides, which can be easily reduced<br />

through technologies that have been used by other power plants for<br />

decades. At a minimum, <strong>Washington</strong> should require pollution controls to<br />

reduce TransAlta's nitrogen oxide. Without these controls, the coal<br />

1<br />

K - 427<br />

Final December 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!