04.03.2013 Views

13-government-services-2013-chapter9

13-government-services-2013-chapter9

13-government-services-2013-chapter9

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Equity and effectiveness — recovery<br />

The equity dimension of recovery indicators relates to whether specific parts of the<br />

community with special needs or difficulties in accessing <strong>government</strong> <strong>services</strong><br />

benefit from recovery strategies, <strong>services</strong> and activities — this chapter provides data<br />

on <strong>services</strong> provided in remote locations, but not other special needs groups. The<br />

effectiveness dimension of recovery indicators relates to community restoration,<br />

and to communities’ and fire service organisations’ ability to return to a state of<br />

preparedness (box 9.6).<br />

Box 9.6 Performance indicators — recovery<br />

There are two elements to recovery: supporting communities in reconstruction of the<br />

physical infrastructure and restoration of emotional, social, economic, ecological and<br />

physical wellbeing following a fire event, and return of communities and fire service<br />

organisations to a state of preparedness after experiencing a fire event.<br />

Recovery indicators are identified as a key development area for future reports.<br />

Efficiency<br />

Fire service organisations’ expenditure per person<br />

‘Fire service organisations’ expenditure per person’ is a proxy indicator of the<br />

efficiency of <strong>government</strong>s in delivering emergency management <strong>services</strong> (box 9.7).<br />

Box 9.7 Fire service organisations’ expenditure per person<br />

‘Fire service organisations’ expenditure per person’ is defined as total fire service<br />

organisation expenditure per person in the population.<br />

All else being equal, lower expenditure per person represents greater efficiency.<br />

However, efficiency data are difficult to interpret. While high or increasing expenditure<br />

per person may reflect deteriorating efficiency, it may also reflect changes in aspects of<br />

the service (such as improved response) or the characteristics of fire events (such as<br />

more challenging fires). Similarly, low or declining expenditure per person may reflect<br />

improving efficiency or lower quality responses or less challenging fires.<br />

Expenditure per person is employed as a proxy for efficiency. Expenditure per fire is<br />

not used as a proxy for fire service organisation efficiency because an organisation<br />

that applies more resources to the prevention and preparedness components to<br />

reduce the number of fire incidents could erroneously appear to be less efficient.<br />

Data reported for this indicator are not directly comparable.<br />

Data quality information for this indicator is under development.<br />

9.24 REPORT ON<br />

GOVERNMENT<br />

SERVICES 20<strong>13</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!