Jenner Bombing Target Archive Search Report Findings
Jenner Bombing Target Archive Search Report Findings
Jenner Bombing Target Archive Search Report Findings
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
7 EVALUATION OF ORDNANCE POTENTIAL<br />
7.1 CONVENTIONAL ORDNANCE CONTAMINATION<br />
Section 7 – Evaluation of Ordnance Potential<br />
Page 36<br />
ARCHIVES SEARCH REPORT – FINDINGS<br />
<strong>Jenner</strong> 12th Naval District <strong>Target</strong> No. 29<br />
<strong>Jenner</strong>, CA<br />
The archive search uncovered evidence that confirmed the Navy utilized conventional<br />
ordnance at <strong>Jenner</strong> 12th Naval District <strong>Target</strong> No. 29. The types of ordnance and<br />
explosives associated with the site included practice bombs. This information was<br />
gathered from documentation, maps, aerial photography results and interviews. None of<br />
the reviewed information indicated any other ordnance related operations at <strong>Jenner</strong> 12th<br />
Naval District <strong>Target</strong> No. 29.<br />
The ASR team did not find an overt indication of a current ordnance and explosive<br />
hazard at <strong>Jenner</strong> 12th Naval District <strong>Target</strong> No. 29. Research discovered no historical<br />
records indicating ordnance disposal on site. Interviews did not disclose any incidents of<br />
ordnance or explosive hazards found in the past. Aerial photography analysis did not<br />
locate any distinct signs of on-site burial. Additionally, the site inspection did not<br />
uncover evidence of ordnance or explosive hazards.<br />
7.2 CHEMICAL WARFARE MATERIAL CONTAMINATION<br />
The archive search uncovered no evidence of chemical warfare materials storage, usage<br />
or disposal at <strong>Jenner</strong> 12th Naval District <strong>Target</strong> No. 29. The mission of <strong>Jenner</strong> 12th<br />
Naval District <strong>Target</strong> No. 29 does not imply the presence of CWM. Research discovered<br />
no historical records associating CWM with the site. Interviews did not disclose any<br />
correlation of CWM with the site. Additionally, the site inspection did not uncover any<br />
evidence of CWM hazards.