22.03.2013 Views

Jenner Bombing Target Archive Search Report Findings

Jenner Bombing Target Archive Search Report Findings

Jenner Bombing Target Archive Search Report Findings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7 EVALUATION OF ORDNANCE POTENTIAL<br />

7.1 CONVENTIONAL ORDNANCE CONTAMINATION<br />

Section 7 – Evaluation of Ordnance Potential<br />

Page 36<br />

ARCHIVES SEARCH REPORT – FINDINGS<br />

<strong>Jenner</strong> 12th Naval District <strong>Target</strong> No. 29<br />

<strong>Jenner</strong>, CA<br />

The archive search uncovered evidence that confirmed the Navy utilized conventional<br />

ordnance at <strong>Jenner</strong> 12th Naval District <strong>Target</strong> No. 29. The types of ordnance and<br />

explosives associated with the site included practice bombs. This information was<br />

gathered from documentation, maps, aerial photography results and interviews. None of<br />

the reviewed information indicated any other ordnance related operations at <strong>Jenner</strong> 12th<br />

Naval District <strong>Target</strong> No. 29.<br />

The ASR team did not find an overt indication of a current ordnance and explosive<br />

hazard at <strong>Jenner</strong> 12th Naval District <strong>Target</strong> No. 29. Research discovered no historical<br />

records indicating ordnance disposal on site. Interviews did not disclose any incidents of<br />

ordnance or explosive hazards found in the past. Aerial photography analysis did not<br />

locate any distinct signs of on-site burial. Additionally, the site inspection did not<br />

uncover evidence of ordnance or explosive hazards.<br />

7.2 CHEMICAL WARFARE MATERIAL CONTAMINATION<br />

The archive search uncovered no evidence of chemical warfare materials storage, usage<br />

or disposal at <strong>Jenner</strong> 12th Naval District <strong>Target</strong> No. 29. The mission of <strong>Jenner</strong> 12th<br />

Naval District <strong>Target</strong> No. 29 does not imply the presence of CWM. Research discovered<br />

no historical records associating CWM with the site. Interviews did not disclose any<br />

correlation of CWM with the site. Additionally, the site inspection did not uncover any<br />

evidence of CWM hazards.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!