22.03.2013 Views

The Maine bugle ... campaign; 1-5 Jan. 1894-Oct. 1898 - Maine.gov

The Maine bugle ... campaign; 1-5 Jan. 1894-Oct. 1898 - Maine.gov

The Maine bugle ... campaign; 1-5 Jan. 1894-Oct. 1898 - Maine.gov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Major j/all's reI'Iew of ai.die. 267<br />

siipjjort his corrected impressions. What then is the basis<br />

of his article? what tlie premises by which he readies liis<br />

strange conchisions? Why, Confederate statements made from<br />

recollection nearly a quarter of a century after the incidents to<br />

which they relate were enacted.<br />

Now it seems to me that if Cai)t. Bliss had designed and<br />

desired to write accurate and reliable history he would ha\'e<br />

given, at least, equal space and equal prominence to official<br />

Union reports of that action with Confederate statements made<br />

from memory so many years aftervvard, and then, if he found<br />

a[)parent differences or disagreements, he would have tried to<br />

harmonize them, and if unable to do so to have stated the<br />

points of difference or disagreements clearly, as he is evidently<br />

able to do, and let his readers decide the (juestions of fact.<br />

And yet I am unwilling to believe that so brave and accom-<br />

[ilished an officer as Ca[)t. I^liss is reputed to have been would<br />

willfully or designedly write and publish an article, that reflects<br />

so much discredit upon the honor and integrity of the officers<br />

who wrote the reports of that action on the Union side without<br />

some honorable and worthy motive, but I confess I am unable<br />

to divine his purpose, unless it be to provoke discussion whereby<br />

all the facts and incidents of that important action may be laid<br />

bare in tne interest of truth and impartial history. I will<br />

assume, for the purposes of this article, that I have guessed his<br />

purpose and that it is as I have indicated.<br />

Now he has put in his side of the case and rested, I will l)egin<br />

by calling a few witnesses. I will call Gen. I). McM. Gregg,<br />

who commanded the Second Cavalry Division on the day in<br />

question. Gen. Gregg says in his re[)ort of that action, " Mov-<br />

ing to the front I found the Second Brigade engaged with a<br />

superior force. <strong>The</strong> necessity for re-enforcements being appar-<br />

ent, the First <strong>Maine</strong> Regiment was ordered to report to Gen.<br />

Kilpatrick. This regiment moved to the front, charged the<br />

enemy at the critical moment, and in connection with the regi-<br />

ments of the Second l^rigade which had been charging the<br />

cnem}' and receiving his charges, drove the cncviy from the field

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!