23.03.2013 Views

Beijing Hutong Conservation Plan - Tibet Heritage Fund

Beijing Hutong Conservation Plan - Tibet Heritage Fund

Beijing Hutong Conservation Plan - Tibet Heritage Fund

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

54<br />

5.3 Cooperation between residents, officials and experts<br />

Residential communities are now recognised as being an integral component of any historic area. Many international projects such as the IBA in Berlin, the<br />

Main Street Program in the USA and the rehabilitation of the Zanzibar have demonstrated the succesful use of community-based area rehabilitation. The<br />

<strong>Hutong</strong> survey confirmed that the present resident community is deep-rooted and is inseparable from the atmosphere of the old city. <strong>Beijing</strong> already has one<br />

of the world’s largest out-door museums, the Forbidden City. The <strong>Hutong</strong>s now have a unique vitality, which will be destroyed if they too are made into<br />

museum towns.<br />

In the Ya er <strong>Hutong</strong> area, an attempt has already been made to re-establish one family courtyards by relocating present residents and redeveloping the<br />

courtyards for wealthy families. So far, this has not been economically successful. One of the problems with this solution has been that the lifestyle of today’s<br />

wealthy owners no longer fits into the <strong>Hutong</strong> community. The wealthy tend not to use local shops and markets, keep their gates locked and use the private<br />

cars to get around. Thus they contribute little to the local community (and bereaving <strong>Beijing</strong> of one of its tourist attractions) whilst overstressing the transport<br />

infrastructure - the Yuan Dynasty lanes. Over the past century, a feudalistic system has transformed into a popular social community. To forcefully remove<br />

thousands of residents for the benefit of a few owners would harm this social system and create a feeling of unfairness and inequality.<br />

It the present residents were to be given security of tenure (in varying degrees for private owners and long-term tenants), many of the current problems<br />

would be solved. Much of the maintenance responsibility could be taken on by residents. To facilitate this, Government officials, technical experts, and<br />

investors need to work together closely with the community. In such a network of co-operation, each group would have designated responsibilities, which<br />

might include:<br />

a) Government input<br />

Strong regulations and enforceable laws for the preservation of historic areas and residence rights<br />

for the original long-term inhabitants.<br />

Infrastructure improvement (sewers, drains etc).<br />

Financial support (especially compensation for voluntarily moving out)<br />

Population control (limiting number of new residents moving into the district)<br />

b) Residents’ input<br />

Regular building maintenance, verified and checked annually by the local Neighborhood<br />

Community Office<br />

Infrastructure upgrading (for example paying for sewage connection, new waterlines within the<br />

courtyard area, heating)<br />

c) Local experts input<br />

Technical advice<br />

Feasibility studies<br />

d) Third (outside) party input:<br />

Limited financial support, international experience, additional technical advice<br />

Residents<br />

Government<br />

<strong>Hutong</strong><br />

Community<br />

Preserve <strong>Beijing</strong> Historical quarters<br />

Sustainable development of <strong>Hutong</strong><br />

community<br />

Local experts<br />

Third party

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!