29.03.2013 Views

late pleistocene population interaction in western europe

late pleistocene population interaction in western europe

late pleistocene population interaction in western europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 25. Schematic representation of the distribution of root etch<strong>in</strong>g at Sa<strong>in</strong>t-Césaire.<br />

Marks left by several natural agents have been identified on bone surfaces at<br />

Sa<strong>in</strong>t-Césaire. Among these, root etch<strong>in</strong>g is the most conspicuous type of damage. In the<br />

sequence, root marks are most frequent <strong>in</strong> the uppermost Evolved Aurignacian EJM and<br />

EJJ and, to a lesser extent, the Châtelperronian (Table 30). Integrat<strong>in</strong>g the spatial<br />

dimension, root marks decrease more or less steadily with depth but <strong>in</strong>crease with<br />

distance away from the cliff. In other words, root marks are most common on the slope,<br />

with a peak <strong>in</strong> meters 6 through 8 <strong>in</strong> the Evolved Aurignacian levels, and lowest near the<br />

cliff <strong>in</strong> the lowermost levels (Figure 25).<br />

These results duplicate the observations derived from bone surface preservation.<br />

Therefore, root etch<strong>in</strong>g is probably responsible for a significant portion of the variation <strong>in</strong><br />

bone surface preservation <strong>in</strong> the assemblages, even though root marks have not been<br />

identified on each specimen that has a damaged surface. The fact that root activity<br />

185

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!