02.04.2013 Views

The Relationship Between The 1990 Census and ... - Census Bureau

The Relationship Between The 1990 Census and ... - Census Bureau

The Relationship Between The 1990 Census and ... - Census Bureau

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Example 5 (Table 3): For the EEO File <strong>and</strong> the 5% PUMS, three detailed categories shown in Table<br />

1, 121 – “Mathematicians,” 123 – “Statisticians,” <strong>and</strong> 124 – “Miscellaneous mathematical<br />

occupations,” were combined into one aggregate category, also numbered 124 – “Miscellaneous<br />

mathematical science occupations, including mathematicians <strong>and</strong> statisticians.” As a result, Table 3<br />

shows that the <strong>1990</strong> <strong>Census</strong> category 067, “Statisticians,” goes entirely (100 percent) into the <strong>Census</strong><br />

2000 aggregate category (124). This is a different result from that shown in Table 1, which displays<br />

all the detailed categories without any aggregation. For this report, aggregate category codes are<br />

shown in parentheses, such as (124), to distinguish them from the detailed categories with the same<br />

numeric code.<br />

Tables 4 <strong>and</strong> 5 convert the 72 industry categories <strong>and</strong> 94 occupation categories found on the <strong>1990</strong> product<br />

called STF-4 to the 90 industry categories <strong>and</strong> 93 occupation categories found on the equivalent 2000<br />

product called SF-4.<br />

Tables 6 <strong>and</strong> 7 convert the 20 industry categories <strong>and</strong> 13 occupation categories found on the <strong>1990</strong> product<br />

called STF-3 to the 20 industry categories <strong>and</strong> 33 occupation categories found on the equivalent 2000<br />

product called SF-3.<br />

Note: the conversion factors <strong>and</strong> numbers shown in Tables 6 <strong>and</strong> 7 differ from <strong>and</strong> replace<br />

preliminary counterparts that the <strong>Census</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> published on its website early in 2003. <strong>The</strong><br />

revisions were due primarily to coding corrections in the double-coded <strong>1990</strong> <strong>Census</strong> Sample used as<br />

the basis for calculating the conversion factors. See the sections above, “Double-coded <strong>1990</strong> <strong>Census</strong><br />

Sample” <strong>and</strong> “Calculation of the Conversion Factors,” for more details.<br />

Tables 8 <strong>and</strong> 9 take all the information provided in Tables 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 for industry <strong>and</strong> occupation,<br />

respectively, redistribute the <strong>1990</strong> detailed categories into the 2000 detailed categories, <strong>and</strong> present the<br />

adjusted <strong>1990</strong> data side-by-side with the <strong>Census</strong> 2000 data for the same categories. Since the adjusted<br />

<strong>1990</strong> data are stated in 2000 terms, the two sets of data are comparable. Tables 8 <strong>and</strong> 9 also show the<br />

percent change in the labor force from <strong>1990</strong> to 2000 for each detailed category, <strong>and</strong> for every aggregate<br />

category, subtotal, <strong>and</strong> grouping shown in the various <strong>Census</strong> 2000 files <strong>and</strong> publications.<br />

Similarly, Tables 10 (industry) <strong>and</strong> 11 (occupation) take all the information provided in Tables 4 through<br />

7, redistribute the <strong>1990</strong> <strong>Census</strong> groupings found on Summary Tape Files 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 into the <strong>Census</strong> 2000<br />

groupings found on Summary Files 3 <strong>and</strong> 4, <strong>and</strong> present the adjusted <strong>1990</strong> data next to the comparable<br />

<strong>Census</strong> 2000 data for the same categories. Note that these tables present data for the employed instead of<br />

the total civilian labor force. Since these figures are derived from Tables 4 through 7, they also reflect<br />

revisions made to the conversion factors since similar data appeared on the <strong>Census</strong> website early in 2003.<br />

DATA HIGHLIGHTS<br />

<strong>The</strong> data in this section come from Tables 8 <strong>and</strong> 9. <strong>The</strong>se tables show that the number of people in the<br />

civilian labor force increased by 11.5 percent from 123.5 million in <strong>1990</strong> to 137.7 million in 2000.<br />

Industries <strong>and</strong> occupations showing a percent increase significantly larger than 11.5 percent, therefore,<br />

grew at a faster rate than average. <strong>The</strong> following are highlights of the industry <strong>and</strong> occupation categories<br />

that showed the most change from <strong>1990</strong> to 2000, after adjusting the <strong>1990</strong> data into the 2000<br />

classifications.<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!