03.04.2013 Views

Digging Out the Embedded Church - The Maranatha Community

Digging Out the Embedded Church - The Maranatha Community

Digging Out the Embedded Church - The Maranatha Community

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>the</strong> <strong>Church</strong> of England‟s doctrinal position. Pusey replied with a series of Eirenicons<br />

contending that <strong>the</strong>re was much in <strong>the</strong> Roman <strong>Church</strong> which was unofficial and added on to<br />

doctrines which both <strong>the</strong> Anglican and Roman <strong>Church</strong>es held in common; if <strong>the</strong> <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

England needed to put its house in order, so did <strong>the</strong> Roman. Anglican apologists now spoke<br />

of two Romes; <strong>the</strong> Rome which held to classical Biblical and Patristic doctrines and <strong>the</strong><br />

Rome which demanded allegiance to a whole range of new and alien doctrines not held by<br />

Christendom at large.<br />

<strong>The</strong> convening of <strong>the</strong> first Vatican Council in 1870, with its passing of <strong>the</strong> dogma of <strong>the</strong><br />

infallibility of <strong>the</strong> Pope when speaking as <strong>the</strong> Teacher of all Christians, „ex ca<strong>the</strong>dra‟, was a<br />

severe setback to any hopes of drawing <strong>the</strong> two communions closer toge<strong>the</strong>r. Later, in 1896,<br />

Pope Leo Xlll‟s Bull Apostolicae Curae condemned Anglican orders as defective and invalid.<br />

It was a sharp rebuttal of any overtures towards unity from <strong>the</strong> Anglicans.<br />

<strong>The</strong> effect of <strong>the</strong> Oxford Movement on fur<strong>the</strong>ring <strong>the</strong> cause of Christian Unity was to make<br />

<strong>the</strong> divisions in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Church</strong> seem more acute. <strong>The</strong> Tractarians wrote about <strong>the</strong> <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

England as <strong>the</strong> Via Media but <strong>the</strong> many Anglicans who defected to Rome under <strong>the</strong><br />

influence of <strong>the</strong> Tractarians and <strong>the</strong> many who did not defect but stayed in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Church</strong><br />

with decidedly Catholic views and practices were proof to many Dissenters and<br />

Evangelicals that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Church</strong> of England was being drawn steadily to Rome ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

being a middle way between Rome and Protestantism.<br />

J A Froude (1818-1894), bro<strong>the</strong>r of Hurrel Froude, who was one of <strong>the</strong> earliest supporters of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Tractarians, wrote in his Short Studies on Great Subjects 99 that <strong>the</strong> Oxford Movement<br />

seriously damaged <strong>the</strong> Evangelical party in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Church</strong> of England. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Church</strong> of England,<br />

after <strong>the</strong> Tractarians, had a clearly Anglo-Catholic party within it, <strong>the</strong> „ritualists‟ of a few<br />

years later, which it had not had before, even among those of „High <strong>Church</strong>‟ views.<br />

THE PLYMOUTH BRETHREN MOVEMENT<br />

<strong>The</strong> Brethren had <strong>the</strong>ir beginning in Dublin in 1829, but were later, in <strong>the</strong> 1840s, associated<br />

with Plymouth in Devon. <strong>The</strong>y were not taken up with <strong>the</strong> charismata of <strong>the</strong> Early <strong>Church</strong> as<br />

<strong>the</strong> Irvingites were and, unlike <strong>the</strong>m, had little interest in rituals as a means of bringing <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Church</strong> back to its roots in <strong>the</strong> Primitive <strong>Church</strong>. <strong>The</strong> Brethren generally believed that <strong>the</strong><br />

organised <strong>Church</strong> was corrupt in doctrine and practice and was beyond remedy. It was a<br />

<strong>Church</strong> in ruins and <strong>the</strong>re was no point in trying to purify any of <strong>the</strong> many existing<br />

denominations. <strong>The</strong>y felt that <strong>the</strong> only course open to <strong>the</strong>m was to separate from all<br />

denominations and welcome all Christians into <strong>the</strong>ir fellowships, solely as brethren and<br />

sisters in Christ. <strong>The</strong>ir cry was for Christians to ga<strong>the</strong>r only to <strong>the</strong> name of <strong>the</strong> Lord Jesus,<br />

not to any o<strong>the</strong>r name.<br />

Sadly, <strong>the</strong>y <strong>the</strong>mselves soon became fragmented into several schismatic groups on a whole<br />

range of issues. <strong>The</strong>y became divided over interpretations of prophecy, and whe<strong>the</strong>r or not<br />

Jesus became sinful in order to bear our sins on <strong>the</strong> Cross; whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re ought to be clearly<br />

designated officers to rule in <strong>the</strong> church; whe<strong>the</strong>r worship should be under <strong>the</strong> spontaneous<br />

99 Froude, James Anthony, Short Studies on Great Subjects, Green & Co, Longmans, Vol iii, 1893, p<br />

172.<br />

Page 96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!