03.04.2013 Views

Digging Out the Embedded Church - The Maranatha Community

Digging Out the Embedded Church - The Maranatha Community

Digging Out the Embedded Church - The Maranatha Community

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

from <strong>the</strong> Son‟) phrase in this Creed, 17 which states that <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit proceeds from <strong>the</strong><br />

Fa<strong>the</strong>r and from <strong>the</strong> Son. To <strong>the</strong> West filioque safeguarded <strong>the</strong> full Deity of <strong>the</strong> Son; to <strong>the</strong><br />

East it did not safeguard <strong>the</strong> distinctiveness of <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r. Today exploration of <strong>the</strong> clause is<br />

bringing <strong>the</strong> two sides nearer toge<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

In relation to Christian Unity in <strong>the</strong> 21 st Century, how should we regard <strong>the</strong>se debates over<br />

doctrine in <strong>the</strong> early days of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Church</strong>? Have <strong>the</strong>y any relevance to us today?<br />

THE RELEVANCE OF THESE ISSUES TO THE CHURCH TODAY<br />

<strong>The</strong> first thing to say is that any attempt to describe what God has done for man in <strong>the</strong><br />

Incarnation is beyond <strong>the</strong> scope of language to deal with adequately; nei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> Greek<br />

philosophical terms of <strong>the</strong> first four centuries, nor any language we may use in <strong>the</strong> 21 st<br />

Century, are adequate.<br />

<strong>The</strong> battles with heresies led to terms being used which became <strong>the</strong> standard terms of debate<br />

and were used in <strong>the</strong> formation of <strong>the</strong> great Creeds of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Church</strong> (what F D Maurice called<br />

<strong>the</strong> „compasses‟ of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Church</strong>). Whe<strong>the</strong>r terms like substantia, homoousios, phusis and so on<br />

can do justice to <strong>the</strong> good news of Jesus may be doubted, but <strong>the</strong>ir value lies in pointing,<br />

compass-like, to one or two basic truths without which <strong>the</strong>re could be no good news.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se truths are that God <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit and Jesus share <strong>the</strong> Deity of One<br />

Godhead; and that Jesus, one of this Godhead, became really man and died for man‟s sins out<br />

of love for all humanity. That really is <strong>the</strong> core of <strong>the</strong> Gospel and <strong>the</strong>re is large Scriptural<br />

support for it.<br />

Where a doctrinal position cannot subscribe to that, as in <strong>the</strong> case of Arianism or<br />

Macedonianism, unity is not possible. As for Nestorianism or Monophysitism, <strong>the</strong> Scriptures<br />

do not give us enough information to make definite statements about <strong>the</strong> relationship of man<br />

and God in <strong>the</strong> Person of Jesus. Nestorianism and Monophysitism both speculate on what is<br />

not revealed in Scripture, and Chalcedon, in not so speculating, was wise to state simply that<br />

Jesus was one Person in two natures and to leave it at that.<br />

Political and historical factors have taken oriental Orthodox churches into isolation from both<br />

mainstream Orthodoxy and from Western Catholicism and Protestantism, but in very recent<br />

years <strong>the</strong> Roman Catholic <strong>Church</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Coptic Orthodox and Syrian Orthodox churches<br />

have consulted each o<strong>the</strong>r with some measure of agreement on Christology.<br />

<strong>Out</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Early <strong>Church</strong> period comes an idea for a basis of unity which has appealed to<br />

ecumenists across <strong>the</strong> centuries. Time and time again <strong>the</strong> ideal of Vincent de Lérins kept<br />

being resurrected, always to find that its limitations made it impracticable. Vincent, who died<br />

some time before 450 AD, probably became a monk on <strong>the</strong> island of Lérins off <strong>the</strong> south<br />

coast of France, where a centre for Christian learning had been established. It is relevant to<br />

our present study to note that, to Vincent, a true tradition must be consistent with <strong>the</strong><br />

teachings of Scripture, which for him were <strong>the</strong> final court of appeal. He accepted that <strong>the</strong>re<br />

17 See Ch 2.<br />

Page 23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!