03.04.2013 Views

Tone of Voice and Mind : The Connections between Intonation ...

Tone of Voice and Mind : The Connections between Intonation ...

Tone of Voice and Mind : The Connections between Intonation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 8<br />

A bilateral neural network simulation<br />

Synopsis<br />

A technique for the bilateral activation <strong>of</strong> neural nets that leads to a<br />

functional asymmetry <strong>of</strong> two simulated “cerebral hemispheres” is described.<br />

<strong>The</strong> simulation is designed to perform object recognition, while exhibiting<br />

characteristics typical <strong>of</strong> human cognition – specifically, a dual focus <strong>of</strong><br />

attention, corresponding to the “nucleus” <strong>and</strong> “fringe.” Sensory neural nets<br />

self-organize <strong>and</strong> the system is then taught arbitrary symbolic labels for a<br />

small number <strong>of</strong> similar sensory stimuli. Mutual homotopic inhibition across<br />

the “corpus callosum” produces functional cerebral asymmetries, i.e.,<br />

complementary activation <strong>of</strong> homologous maps within a common focus <strong>of</strong><br />

attention – a “nucleus” in the left hemisphere <strong>and</strong> a “fringe” in the right<br />

hemisphere. An object is recognized as corresponding to a known label when<br />

the total activation <strong>of</strong> both hemispheres (nucleus plus fringe) is strongest for<br />

that label. <strong>The</strong> functional dualities <strong>of</strong> the cerebral hemispheres are discussed<br />

in light <strong>of</strong> the nucleus/fringe asymmetry.<br />

A distinction was drawn in Chapters 6 <strong>and</strong> 7 <strong>between</strong> consciousness <strong>and</strong> cognition<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> basic properties <strong>of</strong> the neuron. In line with that view, it is unrealistic<br />

to believe that a silicon-based computer could become conscious in the<br />

normal biological sense <strong>of</strong> that word, because it is specificallytheexchange<strong>of</strong><br />

materials across the cell membrane that gives the neuron <strong>and</strong> neuron-systems<br />

their property <strong>of</strong> sensitivity to an external world. For the neuron, “receptivity to<br />

the surrounding world” is not a metaphor, but rather a factual statement about<br />

how it learns <strong>of</strong> external changes. For existing silicon systems, “receptivity” is<br />

metaphorical <strong>and</strong> all knowledge <strong>of</strong> the external world is hard-won through data<br />

processing. This fundamental difference <strong>between</strong> the living <strong>and</strong> the non-living<br />

worlds implies deep <strong>and</strong> probably lasting differences in the quality <strong>of</strong> “minds”<br />

<strong>of</strong> men <strong>and</strong> machines.<br />

Nevertheless, the information-processing that neurons are capable <strong>of</strong> can<br />

certainly be simulated (but not the feeling <strong>of</strong> the information-processing!), so<br />

that, in principle, any form <strong>of</strong> cognition that can be explicitly defined can be<br />

simulated in a computer. Thus far, many sophisticated simulations have been<br />

developed world-wide (e.g., Edelman 1992), but the issue <strong>of</strong> the bilaterality <strong>of</strong><br />

the nervous system, particularly with regard to language, has been thoroughly

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!