03.04.2013 Views

Tone of Voice and Mind : The Connections between Intonation ...

Tone of Voice and Mind : The Connections between Intonation ...

Tone of Voice and Mind : The Connections between Intonation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

40 Chapter 2<br />

D. <strong>The</strong> central dogma<br />

In the discussion <strong>of</strong> the hemispheric contributions to language processing, a<br />

remarkable similarity <strong>between</strong> the effects due to RH damage <strong>and</strong> callosal damage<br />

was noted (Sections A <strong>and</strong> B); that similarity suggests that normal RH contributions<br />

to language are realized through transmission <strong>of</strong> RH information<br />

to the LH across the corpus callosum. Moreover, the most obvious possibility<br />

for explaining HERA (Section C) was that the RH contributes to languageprocessing<br />

by communicating callosally with the LH, rather than using its information<br />

for direct control over the relevant somatic musculature (the organs<br />

<strong>of</strong> speech). <strong>The</strong> HERA effect is a clear illustration <strong>of</strong> hemispheric cooperation<br />

thatwouldnotbepredictedbyasimple“LH-dominance” model <strong>of</strong> language<br />

processing. This pattern <strong>of</strong> information processing in the human brain can<br />

be summarized in what I have referred to as the “central dogma” <strong>of</strong> human<br />

neuropsychology (Cook 1986, 1989, 2002a, b):<br />

RH ←→ LH → striate musculature<br />

It is “central” because it involves truly fundamental language <strong>and</strong> h<strong>and</strong>edness<br />

functions that are characteristic <strong>of</strong> the human brain. And it is “dogma” because<br />

it is a fundamental tenet <strong>of</strong> clinical neuropsychology – fully established in<br />

that realm, but remaining scientifically “incomplete” in so far as neuron-level<br />

mechanisms remain uncertain.<br />

<strong>The</strong> central dogma for psychology suggests that the function for which<br />

the left hemisphere has become specialized is the sequentialization (Greenfield<br />

1991; or perhaps “response selection,” Rushworth et al. 1998) <strong>of</strong> motor behavior.<br />

With practice, all forms <strong>of</strong> motor activity become at least partly automatized<br />

<strong>and</strong> the sequence <strong>of</strong> flexion <strong>and</strong> extension <strong>of</strong> individual muscles is executed<br />

with little or no conscious attention. As a consequence, it is easy to forget<br />

the motor control difficulties inherent to even “simple” manual tasks. Truly unfamiliar<br />

tasks – such as eating with chopsticks – are surprisingly difficult until<br />

sufficient practice has been had. But even eating soup with the non-dominant<br />

h<strong>and</strong> can be sloppy – not because we are unfamiliar with soupspoons, but<br />

because the rather trivial balancing act needed to keep the spoon horizontal<br />

is not something we normally do with the left h<strong>and</strong>. For anyone still unimpressed<br />

with the complexity required for “simple” motor control tasks, try<br />

enunciating a new sentence in a foreign language learned in high school. Overlearned<br />

phrases like “Comment allez-vous?” may sound almost like French, but<br />

any br<strong>and</strong>-new concatenation <strong>of</strong> consonants <strong>and</strong> vowels is likely to leave your<br />

Parisian friends dumbfounded! Both speech <strong>and</strong> h<strong>and</strong> movements require se-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!