03.04.2013 Views

Tone of Voice and Mind : The Connections between Intonation ...

Tone of Voice and Mind : The Connections between Intonation ...

Tone of Voice and Mind : The Connections between Intonation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Preface<br />

In 1986, I wrote a book with the audacious title <strong>of</strong> “<strong>The</strong> Brain Code,” which<br />

summarized the findings from neuropsychology indicating a particular view <strong>of</strong><br />

hemispheric specialization. <strong>The</strong> basic argument was that the functions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

human cerebral hemispheres are not simply different from one another, but<br />

complementary – principally due to mutually inhibitory effects acting through<br />

the corpus callosum. <strong>The</strong> topic <strong>of</strong> hemispheric specialization is just one part<br />

<strong>of</strong> human psychology, but left <strong>and</strong> right hemisphere relations simply must<br />

be addressed in any serious attempt to underst<strong>and</strong> characteristically human<br />

behaviors such as language <strong>and</strong> tool-usage.<br />

I chose the phrase “brain code” because I was convinced that the phenomena<br />

<strong>of</strong> the human mind needed to be described at the appropriate brain level –<br />

not at the level <strong>of</strong> the gene or the neurotransmitter, <strong>and</strong> not in terms <strong>of</strong> social<br />

psychology or politics. <strong>The</strong> lower-level “neuron code” <strong>and</strong> the higher-level “social<br />

code” are both important topics, but in my view psychology should be primarily<br />

about the functions <strong>of</strong> whole brains <strong>and</strong> individual behavior. Of course,<br />

neuron physiology underlies all psychology, <strong>and</strong> beneath that level there are<br />

relevant genetic <strong>and</strong> biochemical phenomena. Equally obvious is the fact that<br />

any true insight into human psychology will have sociological <strong>and</strong> political<br />

implications, <strong>and</strong> that sociopolitical phenomena provide much <strong>of</strong> the content<br />

<strong>of</strong> our daily mental lives. Still, I maintain that the aim <strong>of</strong> psychology proper<br />

should be the clarification <strong>of</strong> the mechanisms <strong>of</strong> thought at the level <strong>of</strong> the<br />

whole-organism in a terminology that relates, first <strong>and</strong> foremost, to the behavior<br />

<strong>of</strong> adult individuals – <strong>and</strong> in a terminology that has clear connections<br />

to “common sense” psychology <strong>and</strong> the “folk wisdom” that we are all familiar<br />

with <strong>and</strong> that still rumble through our minds <strong>and</strong> daily conversations.<br />

My impression then <strong>and</strong> still today is that many discussions <strong>of</strong> ostensibly<br />

psychological matters end up discussions about other issues – higher or lower<br />

level topics that are perhaps <strong>of</strong> interest to anyone studying psychology, but issues<br />

that should not <strong>and</strong> cannot replace our discussion <strong>of</strong> the brain <strong>and</strong> its<br />

control over behavior. <strong>The</strong> declaration <strong>of</strong> a “brain code” was an attempt to<br />

focus on the questions <strong>of</strong> brain mechanisms – principally, how thoughts <strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!