07.04.2013 Views

Peel Inlet and Harvey Estuary System Management Strategy ...

Peel Inlet and Harvey Estuary System Management Strategy ...

Peel Inlet and Harvey Estuary System Management Strategy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EPA Report on the <strong>Peel</strong>-<strong>Harvey</strong> Progress <strong>and</strong> Compliance Report, 2003<br />

M16<br />

M16-1<br />

M17 <strong>and</strong> 17-1 16 April 1993<br />

16 April 1993 Met. Compliance verified.<br />

16 April 1993 Met. Compliance verified.<br />

Partially met. A PCR was prepared but EPA<br />

was not consulted as required by the<br />

Condition.<br />

7. THE LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR<br />

MANAGEMENT AND THE PEEL-HARVEY<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION POLICY<br />

The Expert Review Committee report provides a very competent analysis of the legal <strong>and</strong><br />

administrative framework for management by drawing on the work in the Specialist<br />

report which forms Appendix 2 to the ERC report. A tiered management framework was<br />

proposed in the EPA assessment consisting of:<br />

• the management objectives for nutrients identified in the EPA assessment being set<br />

in the Environmental Conditions<br />

• an Environmental Protection Policy which includes those nutrient objectives as the<br />

environmental objectives in the EPP; <strong>and</strong><br />

• development of a comprehensive integrated catchment management plan.<br />

The EPA identified in its 1985 <strong>and</strong> 1988 assessments that the government would need to<br />

develop an implementation mechanism for implementation of a catchment management<br />

plan. The EPA notes that no such mechanism has yet been developed to enable<br />

implementation of catchment management plans <strong>and</strong> the approach used to date for some<br />

areas where diffuse source pollution is an issue (<strong>Peel</strong>-<strong>Harvey</strong>; Gnangara <strong>and</strong> J<strong>and</strong>akot<br />

groundwater mounds) of an EPP with an associated Statement of Planning Policy (SPP)<br />

for l<strong>and</strong> use control has largely not been successful.<br />

The EPA notes that the lack of an appropriate mechanism to implement catchment<br />

management plans is of great concern, given that detailed salinity <strong>and</strong> natural resource<br />

management plans will increasingly be required to address the State’s major multiple<br />

natural resource issues at a catchment scale. The EPA has recommended that such a<br />

mechanism is required on two prior occasions (EPA, 1985 <strong>and</strong> 1988) <strong>and</strong> in this report is<br />

also urging the government to address this issue.<br />

The concept of the Environmental Protection Policy (EPP) for the <strong>Peel</strong>-<strong>Harvey</strong> coastal<br />

catchment, gazetted on 11 December 1992, remains the appropriate instrument for the<br />

EPA to set broad environmental quality objectives for the area as well as describing the<br />

mechanism for achieving these objectives. The mechanism includes appropriate l<strong>and</strong><br />

management by l<strong>and</strong>holders <strong>and</strong> management authorities. The EPA supports the<br />

establishment of the <strong>Peel</strong>-<strong>Harvey</strong> Catchment Council (in August 2000), which currently<br />

is a sub-regional Council within the broader South West Catchment Council, but the<br />

EPA is of the view that the initiative for the development of environmental values <strong>and</strong><br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!