07.04.2013 Views

Peel Inlet and Harvey Estuary System Management Strategy ...

Peel Inlet and Harvey Estuary System Management Strategy ...

Peel Inlet and Harvey Estuary System Management Strategy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EPA Report on the <strong>Peel</strong>-<strong>Harvey</strong> Progress <strong>and</strong> Compliance Report, 2003<br />

<strong>and</strong> that it should be made to work in the manner envisaged. To do so will necessitate<br />

priority development of the comprehensive catchment management plan (proposed in<br />

1988) <strong>and</strong> the implementation mechanism (proposed by the EPA in 1985 <strong>and</strong> 1988).<br />

ERC Recommendation L2<br />

It is recommended that the concept of “co-proponents” who are severally <strong>and</strong> jointly<br />

responsible for implementation of the whole management strategy be strengthened,<br />

recognising that this is a “whole of government” project <strong>and</strong> requires strong cooperation<br />

by all proponents, other decision-maker, management agencies <strong>and</strong> the<br />

community.<br />

ERC Recommendation L3<br />

It is recommended that a single point of responsibility be established to ensure that the<br />

whole management strategy is implemented. This would provide a responsible person to<br />

act as the key contact with the various agencies involved in decision-making,<br />

management <strong>and</strong> meeting the Environmental Conditions.<br />

ERC Recommendation L4<br />

It is recommended that the Environmental Protection Authority take a more pro-active<br />

approach in ensuring that the proponents <strong>and</strong> other parts of government collectively<br />

deliver on the total management required. For example, the EPA can (with input from<br />

key agencies) develop a work plan <strong>and</strong> require regular reporting on progress against the<br />

plan.<br />

ERC Recommendation L5<br />

It is recommended that an appropriate implementation mechanism for the EPP,<br />

including a mechanism for implementation of catchment management, be identified, or a<br />

new tool be developed, if using an SPP as the main means of implementation is no longer<br />

valid.<br />

ERC Recommendation L6<br />

It is recommended that the EPA provides leadership on the issue of control <strong>and</strong><br />

regulation (if required) of diffuse sources of pollution to establish equity in the<br />

management of diffuse <strong>and</strong> point sources of pollution. In taking such an approach, the<br />

EPA should take account of the magnitude of environmental effect on the receiving<br />

environment from the various contributing sources <strong>and</strong> adopt a catchment level, riskbased<br />

approach to requiring operators to reduce their nutrient losses to the environment.<br />

ERC Recommendation L7<br />

It is recommended that a comprehensive integrated catchment management plan be<br />

developed <strong>and</strong> implemented as a matter of urgency. At the same time a review should be<br />

carried out to recommend a mix of incentives <strong>and</strong> regulatory measures to lead to full<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!