07.04.2013 Views

Peel Inlet and Harvey Estuary System Management Strategy ...

Peel Inlet and Harvey Estuary System Management Strategy ...

Peel Inlet and Harvey Estuary System Management Strategy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EPA Report on the <strong>Peel</strong>-<strong>Harvey</strong> Progress <strong>and</strong> Compliance Report, 2003<br />

8. THE DAWESVILLE CHANNEL, CATCHMENT<br />

MANAGEMENT AND WATER QUALITY<br />

The authors of the EPA Bulletin on the <strong>Peel</strong>-<strong>Harvey</strong> management strategy in 1988 were<br />

farsighted in their advice on the requirements for a catchment management plan as an<br />

integral part of the strategy for improving water quality. The management strategy<br />

developed by the EPA in 1988 was the first attempt in Australia (<strong>and</strong> probably in the<br />

world) at management of a diffuse source of pollution problem where catchment<br />

management needed to be tackled in association with a major engineering approach. The<br />

revised Environmental Protection Act was new in its application <strong>and</strong> the role of<br />

Environmental Conditions in achieving management objectives identified by the EPA<br />

was still being developed. Describing approaches <strong>and</strong> mechanisms for auditing<br />

compliance by the Department <strong>and</strong> for proponents had barely commenced, <strong>and</strong><br />

environmental management systems were in their infancy. It was early days for<br />

catchment management anywhere in Australia, <strong>and</strong> indeed the world.<br />

The <strong>Peel</strong>-<strong>Harvey</strong> system was, <strong>and</strong> remains, an icon of Western Australia, as well as being<br />

of international significance as a Ramsar wetl<strong>and</strong>. The EPA 1988 assessment report<br />

stated:<br />

“<strong>Management</strong> of the problems of the <strong>Peel</strong> <strong>Inlet</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Harvey</strong> <strong>Estuary</strong> waterways <strong>and</strong> their<br />

catchments will require the adoption of a long-term view <strong>and</strong> a holistic approach.<br />

Because some of the remedial measures proposed in this report will be on a scale <strong>and</strong> of<br />

a kind not previously undertaken, they will generate considerable world-wide interest.<br />

At the local level, the Dawesville Channel will be the largest coastal engineering<br />

project undertaken since C Y O’Connor built Fremantle harbour. The proposals to<br />

manage agricultural activities in the catchment would also be innovative in that the<br />

emphasis is on a co-operative approach rather than on a strict regulatory approach of<br />

the kind being adopted by a number of European countries to control similar problems<br />

“ (EPA 1988, p. 1-2).<br />

The Dawesville Channel<br />

The Dawesville Channel has now been constructed <strong>and</strong> has been successful in improving<br />

the water quality in the main body of the <strong>Peel</strong> <strong>Inlet</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Harvey</strong> <strong>Estuary</strong>. However, water<br />

quality <strong>and</strong> environmental problems remain in the rivers, <strong>and</strong> in areas such as the<br />

Serpentine Lakes. The second part of the <strong>Strategy</strong>, that of catchment management to<br />

“cap” the phosphorus input to the waterways remains the aspect of the management<br />

package that still requires significant action.<br />

The ERC report found that the predictions made by the EPA in regard to the channel’s<br />

performance <strong>and</strong> likely environmental impacts were correctly predicted <strong>and</strong> no<br />

unpredicted impacts resulted (see Table 7 of the ERC report). However, the success of<br />

the Dawesville Channel in improving the water quality in the estuaries does not provide a<br />

basis for any relaxation in the requirements for catchment management. The Channel has<br />

an engineered, fixed maximum flushing capacity, <strong>and</strong> catchment management is essential<br />

to provide an adequate buffer to ensure maintenance of the estuary health <strong>and</strong> resilience<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!