17.04.2013 Views

Volume. 1, July - September, 2012 - amam-ayurveda.org

Volume. 1, July - September, 2012 - amam-ayurveda.org

Volume. 1, July - September, 2012 - amam-ayurveda.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 1: Pattern of Improvement in the subjects with increased duration<br />

of cycles<br />

Duration Baseline Cycle<br />

1<br />

(>32 days)<br />

Increased<br />

cycles<br />

Mean 46.15<br />

(n=26)<br />

35.03<br />

(n=26)<br />

Cycle 2 Cycle<br />

3<br />

35.65<br />

(n=26)<br />

30.45<br />

(n=22)<br />

± 18.9 ± 9.72 ± 7.82 ± 4.04<br />

Mean<br />

Change<br />

Info Ayurveda, <strong>Volume</strong> 2, No.1, <strong>July</strong> to <strong>September</strong>’ <strong>2012</strong><br />

%<br />

reduction<br />

15.7 34.01<br />

4.1.2. Effect of WHS on decreased duration of cycles (n=5):<br />

In subjects reporting with decreased duration of cycles (n=5), mean<br />

duration was 17.80 (+ 03.97) days at baseline. After intervention<br />

with the trial drug, all the subjects (100%) have achieved near normal<br />

duration of cycles by the end of fourth cycle with a mean duration of<br />

23.60 (+ 07.16) days. Mean change was 05.80 days i.e., 32.58% increase<br />

in duration of cycle with P32 days)<br />

Increased<br />

cycles<br />

Mean 17.80<br />

(n=5)<br />

22.60<br />

(n=5)<br />

Cycle<br />

2<br />

23.00<br />

(n=5)<br />

Cycle<br />

3<br />

22.20<br />

(n=5)<br />

Cycle<br />

4<br />

23.60<br />

(n=5)<br />

SD ±3.97 ±3.43 ±2.73 ±4.49 ±7.16<br />

4.2. Effect of trial drug on irregular bleeding days<br />

Mean<br />

Change<br />

%<br />

reduction<br />

5.8 32.58<br />

4.2.1. Effect on increased bleeding days (n=11):<br />

After the intervention with the trial drug none of the subjects shown<br />

normal bleeding days by the 3rd cycle. Only 4 subjects (36.67%) have<br />

shown normal bleeding days pattern during the 4th cycle. The mean<br />

number of days of improvement was 0.97 days i.e., a percentage reduction<br />

of 14.43% with P>0.05<br />

Table 3: Effect of trial drug in subjects with increased bleeding days<br />

Duration Baseline Cycle<br />

1<br />

(>32 days)<br />

Increased<br />

cycles<br />

Mean 03.75<br />

(n=8)<br />

04.25<br />

(n=8)<br />

Cycle<br />

2<br />

04.25<br />

(n=8)<br />

Cycle<br />

3<br />

04.13<br />

(n=8)<br />

Cycle<br />

4<br />

04.20<br />

(n=5)<br />

SD ± 0.7 ± 1.4 ± 1.3 ± 0.9 ± 0.8<br />

Mean<br />

Change<br />

%<br />

reduction<br />

0.45 12.00%<br />

4.2.2. Effect on decreased bleeding days (n=8):<br />

After the intervention with the trial drug all the subjects have shown<br />

normal bleeding days by the 3rd cycle (4.2 days + 0.90). The mean number<br />

of increase in bleeding days was 0.45 days i.e., a percentage increase of<br />

12.00% with P>0.05.<br />

Table 4: Effect of trial drug in subjects with decreased bleeding days<br />

Duration Baseline Cycle 1 Cycle<br />

2<br />

( > 3 2<br />

days)<br />

Increased<br />

cycles<br />

Mean 17.80<br />

(n=5)<br />

22.60<br />

(n=5)<br />

23.00<br />

(n=5)<br />

Cycle<br />

3<br />

22.20<br />

(n=5)<br />

Cycle<br />

4<br />

23.60<br />

(n=5)<br />

SD ±3.97 ±3.43 ±2.73 ±4.49 ±7.16<br />

Mean<br />

Change<br />

%<br />

reduction<br />

5.8 32.58<br />

4.2.3. Effect of Trial drug on number of pads (increased duration of<br />

cycles): (n=26)<br />

The reduction in number of pads in case of subjects having increased<br />

duration of cycles was 21.4 at baseline against 19.4 at the end of 4th<br />

cycle.<br />

Table 5: Efficacy of WHS on no. of pads in increased duration of cycles<br />

Baseline<br />

(n=26)<br />

cycle 1<br />

(n=26)<br />

Cycle 2<br />

(n=26)<br />

Cycle 3<br />

(n=22)<br />

No. of pads 21.4 24.42 26.5 23.4 19.4<br />

Cycle 4 (n=5)<br />

4.2.4. Effect of trial drug on number of pads (decreased duration of<br />

cycle): (n=5)<br />

There was an increase in number of pads in case of subjects having<br />

decreased duration of cycles viz., 16.3 at baseline against 21.4 at the end<br />

of 4th cycle.<br />

Table 6: Efficacy of WHS on no. of pads in decreased duration of cycles<br />

No. of<br />

pads<br />

Baseline<br />

(n=5)<br />

cycle 1<br />

(n=5)<br />

Cycle 2<br />

(n=5)<br />

Cycle 3<br />

(n=5)<br />

Cycle<br />

4<br />

(n=5)<br />

Cycle 5<br />

(n=5)<br />

16.3 21.1 19.8 23.1 21.4 28.75<br />

4.2.5. Effect of trial drug on menstrual flow (increased duration of<br />

Cycle): (n=26)<br />

Among 26 subjects in the increased duration of cycle, there were 9 with<br />

heavy flow and 8 with scanty flow. Remaining 9 subjects presented with<br />

moderate (normal) flow. In the heavy flow category only one subject was<br />

left with heavy bleeding by 3rd cycle. Among the scanty flow category 2<br />

were left with scanty flow by 3rd cycle.<br />

Table 7: Efficacy of WHS on amount of flow in increased duration of<br />

cycles<br />

Flow Baseline cycle 1 Cycle 2 Cycle 3 Cycle 4<br />

Heavy 9 7 2 2<br />

Moderate 9 14 19 19 5<br />

Scanty 8 5 5 2<br />

4.2.6. Effect of trial drug on menstrual flow (decreased duration of<br />

Cycle): (n=5)<br />

In case of decreased duration of cycles, 2 had heavy flow and 3 had<br />

moderate (normal) flow. By 4th cycle all the subjects have fallen under<br />

the moderate flow category.<br />

Table 8: Efficacy of WHS on amount of flow in decreased duration of<br />

cycles<br />

Flow Baseline cycle 1 Cycle 2 Cycle 3 Cycle 4 Cycle 5<br />

Heavy 2 1 1 1 0 0<br />

Moderate 3 4 4 4 5 2<br />

Scanty 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!