01.05.2013 Views

Etudes des proprietes des neutrinos dans les contextes ...

Etudes des proprietes des neutrinos dans les contextes ...

Etudes des proprietes des neutrinos dans les contextes ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tel-00450051, version 1 - 25 Jan 2010<br />

the adiabaticity parameter is consequently:<br />

γ = |Em1 − Em2|<br />

|2 ˙ θm(t)|<br />

(B.19)<br />

A similar problem is actually well known in atomic physics. In such a context,<br />

the hopping probability has been calculated by Landau and Zener in 1932 and in<br />

their approximation one obtains:<br />

π<br />

−<br />

Phop ≃ e 2 γr (B.20)<br />

where γr, the adiabaticity evaluated at the resonance point, is:<br />

γr = sin2 2θV ∆m<br />

cos 2θV<br />

2<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

d lnNe(t) −1<br />

<br />

2E dt <br />

B.3 The Landau-Zener formula<br />

t=tr<br />

(B.21)<br />

Considering the crossing of a polar and homopolar state of a molecule Landau<br />

and Zener, in 1932, independently derived, with some approximations, an analytical<br />

formula for non-adiabatic crossing probability. About some 50 years later<br />

people realised the importance of this formula in neutrino physics. We follow<br />

an approach similar to Zener derivation to demonstrate the formula, adapted for<br />

<strong>neutrinos</strong>. Let us rewrite the effective matter Hamiltonian in the flavour basis:<br />

Hfl =<br />

=<br />

<br />

−∆m2 4E cos 2θV + √ 2<br />

2 GFNe<br />

∆m2 sin 2θV 4E<br />

<br />

H1 H12<br />

H12 H2<br />

∆m 2<br />

4E<br />

sin 2θV<br />

∆m 2<br />

4E cos 2θV − √ 2<br />

2 GFNe<br />

<br />

(B.22)<br />

To derive such formula we consider that the region of transition we are interested<br />

in is so small that H1 − H2 = √ 2GF Ne = −α t can be approximated to a linear<br />

function. This assumption is the same that making a Taylor development to the<br />

first order of Ne(t) at the time of resonance t = tr:<br />

Ne(t) ≃ Ne(tr) + dNe(t)<br />

|t=tr(t − tr) (B.23)<br />

dt<br />

In its paper Zener was considering another approximation ˙ H12 = 0, but in our<br />

case, this is true without any approximation since θV is constant. Considering a<br />

neutrino state |ν(t)〉 = Ce(t)|νe〉 + Cµ(t)|νµ〉, the evolution equation we have to<br />

solve is:<br />

i d<br />

dt<br />

Ce<br />

Cµ<br />

<br />

=<br />

− ∆m2<br />

4E cos 2θV + √ 2<br />

2 GFNe<br />

∆m2 sin 2θV 4E<br />

163<br />

∆m 2<br />

4E<br />

sin 2θV<br />

∆m 2<br />

4E cos 2θV − √ 2<br />

2 GFNe<br />

Ce<br />

Cµ<br />

(B.24)<br />

<br />

.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!