01.05.2013 Views

Etudes des proprietes des neutrinos dans les contextes ...

Etudes des proprietes des neutrinos dans les contextes ...

Etudes des proprietes des neutrinos dans les contextes ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tel-00450051, version 1 - 25 Jan 2010<br />

Implications on the fluxes in the supernova environment<br />

According to supernova simulations, the neutrino fluxes at the neutrino sphere<br />

are quite well <strong>des</strong>cribed by Fermi-Dirac distributions or power-law spectra [78].<br />

Neutrino masses and mixings modify this simple pattern by mixing the spectra<br />

during neutrino evolution. We recall that a neutrino hierarchy of temperatures<br />

at the neutrino sphere exists Eq.(3.21). The (differential) neutrino fluxes of type<br />

i (mass or flavour) are given logically by this formula:<br />

φνi (δ) = Lνi P(νi → νi) + Lνj P(νj → νi) + Lνk P(νk → νi) (4.31)<br />

where the luminosities are defined by the following relation:<br />

Lνi (r, Eν) =<br />

L 0 νi<br />

4πr 2 (Tνi )3<br />

1 E<br />

〈Eν〉F2(η)<br />

2 ν<br />

1 + exp (Eν/Tν − ηνi )<br />

(4.32)<br />

as seen in chapter 3.<br />

Since here we consider interactions between <strong>neutrinos</strong> and matter only at tree<br />

level, the interactions via neutral current for νµ and ντ will be the same before<br />

being emitted at the neutrino-sphere. Their respective last scattering surface will<br />

also be superimposed with such assumptions. Consequently, for νµ and ντ we have<br />

the same L0 , the same temperature Tνi (therefore the same average energy) and<br />

νi<br />

finally the same pinched factor ηνi . All these equalities on the different parameters<br />

of a flux (Eq.(4.32)) imply the equality of the two fluxes:<br />

Lνµ = Lντ<br />

(4.33)<br />

Using this relation on the flux expression of Eq.(4.31) for electron <strong>neutrinos</strong>, we<br />

have:<br />

φνe(δ) = Lνi P(νe → νe) + Lνµ (P(νµ → νe) + P(ντ → νe)) (4.34)<br />

As seen previously, the electron neutrino survival probability P(νe → νe) does<br />

not depend on δ (Eq.(4.25)), neither the sum of P(νµ → νe) + P(ντ → νe)<br />

(Eq.(4.29)). Consequently, the electron neutrino flux does not depend on δ, the<br />

Dirac CP-violating phase 2 . The reason we are mainly interested in such a flux<br />

is simple. Recalling that the electron neutrino and anti-<strong>neutrinos</strong> are the only<br />

fluxes that interact with matter via charged-current, they are the only one to<br />

have an influence inside the supernova, like on the electron fraction, or leave a<br />

specific imprint on an observatory on Earth. Indeed, only these fluxes can be<br />

detected independently because they can interact via charged-current, contrary<br />

to the νµ and ντ fluxes since the neutrino energy are too low in comparison with<br />

the muon mass (and even more the tau mass) for such partic<strong>les</strong> to be created. If<br />

one starts with identical spectra with tau and mu <strong>neutrinos</strong>, one gets the same<br />

electron neutrino spectra no matter what the value of the CP-violating phase is.<br />

2 A remark on this aspect is also made in [120] where such relation was only numerically<br />

observed.<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!