01.05.2013 Views

Etudes des proprietes des neutrinos dans les contextes ...

Etudes des proprietes des neutrinos dans les contextes ...

Etudes des proprietes des neutrinos dans les contextes ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

tel-00450051, version 1 - 25 Jan 2010<br />

matter states are the instantaneous matter eigenstates which allow a instantaneous<br />

diagonalization of the effective Hamiltonian written in the flavour basis<br />

Hfv as in Eq.(1.44):<br />

Um(t) † Hfv(t)Um(t) = Hd(t) = diag(Em1(t), Em2(t)) . (1.46)<br />

with Em1(t) and Em2(t) are instantaneous eigenvalues of Hfv(t). The evolution<br />

equation in the basis of the instantaneous eigenstates can therefore be written as<br />

i(d/dt)ν = [Hd − iU † m (dUm/dt)]ν, or<br />

i d<br />

<br />

νm1<br />

dt νm2<br />

<br />

=<br />

Em1(t) −i ˙ θm(t)<br />

i ˙ θm(t) Em2(t)<br />

νm1<br />

νm2<br />

<br />

, (1.47)<br />

where ˙ θm ≡ dθm/dt. Notice that the effective matter Hamiltonian in this basis is<br />

not diagonal since the mixing angle θm(t) is not constant, i.e. the matter eigenstate<br />

basis changes with time. To obtain the oscillation probability equations<br />

with the same simple form as in vacuum, we can study the case where the matter<br />

density (and chemical composition) is taken constant (i.e Ne = const). Therefore,<br />

we obtain a diagonal effective Hamiltonian for the matter eigenstates since<br />

dUm/dt = 0 just like the vacuum Hamiltonian is diagonal in the mass basis. To<br />

derive an explicit oscillation probability equation one has to express the matter<br />

mixing angle as a function of density and the vacuum mixing angle, by linking<br />

the matter basis to the flavour basis. Starting from Eq.(1.47) with no off-diagonal<br />

terms, and rotating in the favour basis, one obtains, after removing the diagonal<br />

(Em1(t) + Em2(t))/2:<br />

i d<br />

<br />

νe<br />

dt νµ<br />

<br />

= (Em1(t) − Em2(t))<br />

2<br />

cos 2θm(t) sin 2θm(t)<br />

sin 2θm(t) − cos 2θm(t)<br />

νe<br />

νµ<br />

<br />

. (1.48)<br />

By comparing this form of the effective Hamiltonian in the flavour basis to the<br />

first one given in Eq.(1.44), one obtains the two following relations:<br />

sin 2θm =<br />

sin 2θV<br />

Em1(t) − Em2(t)<br />

∆m 2<br />

2E<br />

(1.49)<br />

cos 2θm = −∆m2<br />

2E cos 2θV + √ 2GF Ne<br />

. (1.50)<br />

Em1(t) − Em2(t)<br />

Em1(t) and Em2(t) are easily found by diagonalizing the effective Hamiltonian of<br />

Eq.(1.44) and their difference is :<br />

Em1(t) − Em2(t) =<br />

∆m 2<br />

2E cos 2θV − √ 2GF Ne<br />

21<br />

2<br />

<br />

∆m2 2<br />

+ sin<br />

2E<br />

2 2θV (1.51)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!