07.05.2013 Views

sign130

sign130

sign130

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

One further RCT (n=35) compared two interventions, lower leg casting plus injections with either saline or<br />

botulinum toxin, to controls receiving usual care. 65 Casting with or without botulinum neurotoxin therapy<br />

(BoNT) was more effective in reducing spasticity and plantigrade contracture at the ankle than usual care<br />

alone. Outcomes were assessed immediately at the end of the period of treatment but long term outcomes<br />

were not reported.<br />

50, 55<br />

Hand splinting has been reported to be ineffective.<br />

C Casts, splints and passive stretching may be considered in cases where contracture and deformity<br />

are progressive.<br />

4.2.2 BOTULINUM NEUROTOxIN THERAPy<br />

Botulinum neurotoxin therapy is a widely adopted treatment for focal spasticity. Most of the evidence to<br />

support its use derives from before and after studies in various populations, including patients with TBI.<br />

Whether the improvements in joint position or spasticity scores seen are clinically important or cost effective<br />

have not been addressed in clinical trials. Much use remains outwith the product licence and is customised<br />

in a multidisciplinary team (MDT) setting to the needs of the individual.<br />

One RCT (n=15) reported gait improvement following treatment of elbow flexion deformities in TBI patients. 66<br />

The BoNT group demonstrated a statistically significant increase in walking velocity after treatment (p=0.037)<br />

and mean modified Ashworth score was significantly reduced from 2.6 before treatment to 1.4 after treatment<br />

(p=0.00003).<br />

One RCT randomised 40 patients with brain injury or stroke to receive either rehabilitative motor therapy<br />

alone (control) or motor therapy plus BoNT (intervention). 67 Fugl-Mayer Assessment scores (measuring physical<br />

ability) were higher in the intervention group at one and three months post injection (mean ±standard<br />

deviation) (23.36±10.69 and 35.36±11.36) than the control group (20.55±10.22 and 30.33±10.96; p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!