14.05.2013 Views

top 10 most valuable banking brands in the world - Brand Finance

top 10 most valuable banking brands in the world - Brand Finance

top 10 most valuable banking brands in the world - Brand Finance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The methodology employed <strong>in</strong> this <strong>Brand</strong>F<strong>in</strong>ance ®<br />

Bank<strong>in</strong>g 500 list<strong>in</strong>g uses a discounted cash flow<br />

(DCF) technique to discount estimated future<br />

royalties, at an appropriate discount rate, to arrive<br />

at a net present value (NPV) of <strong>the</strong> trademark<br />

and associated <strong>in</strong>tellectual property: <strong>the</strong> brand<br />

value.<br />

The steps <strong>in</strong> this process are:<br />

• Obta<strong>in</strong> brand-specific f<strong>in</strong>ancial and revenue<br />

data. The revenue was <strong>the</strong>n segmented <strong>in</strong>to<br />

<strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g revenue streams: retail <strong>bank<strong>in</strong>g</strong>,<br />

commercial <strong>bank<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, wholesale/<strong>in</strong>vestment<br />

<strong>bank<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, <strong>in</strong>surance, asset management and<br />

credit cards.<br />

• Model <strong>the</strong> market to identify market demand and<br />

<strong>the</strong> position of <strong>in</strong>dividual banks <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> context of<br />

all o<strong>the</strong>r market competitors.<br />

Three forecast periods were used:<br />

- Estimated f<strong>in</strong>ancial results for 20<strong>10</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Institutional Brokers Estimate System (IBES)<br />

consensus forecast.<br />

- A five-year forecast period (2011-2015),<br />

based on three data sources (IBES, historic<br />

growth and GDP growth).<br />

- Perpetuity growth, based on a comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

of growth expectations (GDP and IBES).<br />

• Establish <strong>the</strong> royalty rate for each bank.<br />

This is done by:<br />

- Calculat<strong>in</strong>g brand strength – on a scale of<br />

0 to <strong>10</strong>0 – accord<strong>in</strong>g to a number of attributes<br />

such as asset strength, emotional connection,<br />

market share and profitability, among o<strong>the</strong>rs.<br />

- Determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> royalty rate for each of <strong>the</strong><br />

revenue streams mentioned <strong>in</strong> step 1.<br />

- Calculate future royalty <strong>in</strong>come stream.<br />

• Calculate <strong>the</strong> discount rate specific to each bank,<br />

tak<strong>in</strong>g account of its size, geographical presence,<br />

reputation, gear<strong>in</strong>g and brand rat<strong>in</strong>g (see below).<br />

• Discount future royalty stream (explicit forecast<br />

and perpetuity periods) to a net present value –<br />

ie: <strong>the</strong> brand value.<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

Rev Forecast<br />

5<br />

- X<br />

X RR tax<br />

Discount Rate<br />

NPV<br />

Explanation of <strong>the</strong><br />

Methodology<br />

Royalty Relief Approach<br />

<strong>Brand</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ance uses <strong>the</strong> royalty relief methodology<br />

that determ<strong>in</strong>es <strong>the</strong> value of <strong>the</strong> brand <strong>in</strong> relation to<br />

<strong>the</strong> royalty rate that would be payable for its use were<br />

it owned by a third party. The royalty rate is applied<br />

to future revenue to determ<strong>in</strong>e an earn<strong>in</strong>gs stream<br />

that is attributable to <strong>the</strong> brand. The brand earn<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

stream is <strong>the</strong>n discounted back to a net present<br />

value.<br />

The royalty relief approach is used for three reasons: it<br />

is favoured by tax authorities and <strong>the</strong> courts because<br />

it calculates brand values by reference to documented<br />

third-party transactions; it can be done based on publicly<br />

available f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>formation; and it is compliant to <strong>the</strong><br />

requirement under <strong>the</strong> International Valuation Standards<br />

Committee (IVSC) to determ<strong>in</strong>e Fair Market Value of<br />

<strong>brands</strong>.<br />

<strong>Brand</strong> Rat<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

These are calculated us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Brand</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ance’s<br />

ßrandßeta ® analysis, which benchmarks <strong>the</strong> strength,<br />

risk and future potential of a brand relative to its<br />

competitors on a scale rang<strong>in</strong>g from AAA to D. It is<br />

conceptually similar to a credit rat<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The data used to calculate <strong>the</strong> rat<strong>in</strong>gs comes from<br />

various sources <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Bloomberg, annual reports<br />

and <strong>Brand</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ance research.<br />

<strong>Brand</strong> Rat<strong>in</strong>gs Def<strong>in</strong>itions<br />

AAA Extremely strong<br />

AA Very strong<br />

A Strong<br />

BBB-B Average<br />

CCC-C Weak<br />

DDD-D Fail<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Valuation Date<br />

All brand values <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> report are for <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong><br />

year, 31st December 20<strong>10</strong>.<br />

26 © <strong>Brand</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ance plc 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!