01.06.2013 Views

Tropical ginsberg

Tropical ginsberg

Tropical ginsberg

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

78<br />

Deslocar a arte do espaço no qual sempre existiu<br />

como objeto sacralizado – museu, biblioteca<br />

etc.[sic] – para integrá-la no quotidiano, nas ruas,<br />

nas praças públicas, 178<br />

Or in other words, reach the masses. This desacralizing process of<br />

producing a much refined and “sacralized” art, for the masses, was<br />

definetely a giant step into uncharted lands, which took a lot of guts.<br />

After all, to mix the “marginal” with the “elite” was all but a calm and<br />

easy thing to do.<br />

To bring the “elite” to the “marginal” is the same as releasing an<br />

innocent ten year old Manhattan school girl, fresh out of a fifth-grade<br />

class, into some grotesque, and smelly, Harlem street; it is quite grim.<br />

Dr. Frankenstein, the “arian,” suddenly has a horrific epiphany: his<br />

creation, the monster, the untouchable, can easily overpower him. That<br />

is to bring the “elite” to the “marginal,” and that is why the elite panics<br />

with the mere thought that it could happen. The suturing connection<br />

between the New Criticism and the MPB artists is quite evident when<br />

we analyze what they were trying to maintain: traditional elitist<br />

standards of art. The New Criticism critics could not conceive that a<br />

new literary movement and cultural revolution were erupting with every<br />

“marginal” stanza that Ginsberg made and said, just as the MPB artists<br />

could not admit that the “marginal” sound the <strong>Tropical</strong>istas were doing<br />

would become a musical and cultural revolution.<br />

The poetry analysis conducted by the New Criticism has left us<br />

with a very elaborate research into poetry on account of having<br />

approached art as science. However, this analysis becomes extremist<br />

when it relegates to a second plan the importance of the author, and the<br />

contextualization of his/her art, while trying to create a pantheon of<br />

poems flying around through time with no author to call creator. God<br />

might know what critics would say about “The Hollow Men,” had it<br />

been penned by Hitler with another title, “Mein Kampf.” To approach<br />

poetry as science is to overlook its essence, which can hardly be<br />

described by words. If we were to approach the poetry of Ginsberg and<br />

the <strong>Tropical</strong>istas’ songs strickly for the purpose of textual analysis, we<br />

would probably be grasping less than half of what Allen Ginsberg and<br />

178 Hoisel, Evelina. Supercaos: Os Estilhaços da cultura em Panamérica e Nações Unidas. Rio<br />

de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 1980. 41. Which reads, “Dislocate art from the space in<br />

which it always existed as a sacralized object – museum, library, etc. – to integreate it in the<br />

daily life, on streets, public parks.” Author’s translation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!