02.06.2013 Views

Usama bin Ladin’s “Father Sheikh”:

Usama bin Ladin’s “Father Sheikh”:

Usama bin Ladin’s “Father Sheikh”:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Mahmud to avoid acting until “the situation becomes clearer” 288 went unheeded.<br />

Engineer Mahmud was soon killed, and by the time that the Taliban consolidated their<br />

control in Nangarhar, Khalis’s view of the movement was already souring.<br />

The vignettes recounted by Din Muhammad depict an increasingly acrimonious and<br />

poisonous relationship between Khalis and various Taliban leaders. Din Muhammad<br />

recalls several incidents of the Taliban reneging on agreements with Khalis, 289 and he<br />

claims that Khalis broadly critiqued the Taliban’s heavy‐handed enforcement of<br />

conservative interpretations of various religious and cultural traditions. 290 True, Din<br />

Muhammad is not the best source for unbiased information about the Taliban; his<br />

family is well‐known for its anti‐Taliban politics. 291 And even Din Muhammad notes<br />

that Khalis was frequently consulted by the Taliban292 and that many of Khalis’s<br />

acquaintances and friends were members of the movement. 293 But these connections and<br />

consultations did not guarantee agreement, and Khalis was not a supporter of such<br />

Taliban policies as enforcing beard length or interrupting critical agricultural work<br />

during the call to prayer. 294 Although details about the nature of Khalis’s interactions<br />

with Mullah Omar are slim, all of the available evidence indicates that the two men<br />

were neither friends nor did they see eye to eye politically. 295<br />

288 Ibid., 97.<br />

289 Most significantly, Din Muhammad claims that the Taliban agreed not to attack Nangarhar: “Mawlawi<br />

Sahib Khalis from time to time had relations with the Taliban’s base in Kandahar. They gave this very<br />

same response that ‘there isn’t a program for Nangarhar, and where there is a program, we will take<br />

relations with Mawlawi Khalis.’” This obviously did not work out. See ibid., 96. The year prior, the<br />

Taliban had assured Khalis that the weapons depots in Ziruk operated by Mati’ullah Khan’s brother Haji<br />

Sarfaraz were under no danger of attack. Even as negotiations were ongoing, the Taliban attacked these<br />

depots and Sarfaraz lit them on fire before fleeing to Waziristan. See ibid., 87–88.<br />

290 Muhammad (2007), 104–107. Here Khalis speaks up at a meeting in Kabul after Nabi Muhammadi<br />

gave an unsatisfactory response to the Taliban representative. Khalis critiques the enforcement of<br />

requirements for beard length and stopping to pray during harvest time when work needs to continue.<br />

Brown and Rassler argue that the Haqqani leadership in Loya Paktia expressed similar misgivings,<br />

especially with respect to the Taliban’s conservative policies regarding women. See Brown and Rassler,<br />

108.<br />

291 His brothers ‘Abd al‐Haq and ‘Abd al‐Qadir were most likely killed by groups affiliated with the<br />

Taliban.<br />

292 There are frequent discussions of Khalis visiting the Taliban leadership and of the Taliban consulting<br />

Khalis for advice about various issues. See Muhammad (2007), 84–85, 87, 96, 101, 104–107 and 108‐110.<br />

293 Ibid., 91–92.<br />

294 Ibid., 104–107.<br />

295 It is revelatory that we only have evidence of one conversation between Khalis and Mullah Omar in<br />

the biographies. The other two times that Khalis attempted to speak with him, Mullah Omar either<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!