02.06.2013 Views

Annual report 2011 - Global Hand

Annual report 2011 - Global Hand

Annual report 2011 - Global Hand

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Case Study-3<br />

Blue Akter, student of class eight comes from Sadar Upazila of Jhalakati district and Mintu<br />

from Machrong village of Banaripara union in Banaripara district loves each other. On last<br />

11/02/05 Blue Akter came to Mintu from her house and both decided to get married. But the<br />

guardians of both are not agreed . Here it is to be noted that both boy and girl are not in age<br />

to get married. The occurrence came to notice to Watchdog Committee member Ms. Sondha<br />

Rani and she inquired the matter from various people. Finally Sondha Rani taughts them<br />

both about the child marriage and adviced them to restrain from marriage. But they didn’t<br />

agree. So, she <strong>report</strong>ed it to elite of the locality. The watchdog brought the guardian of the<br />

girl and they asked the cooperation of the watchdog to stop this marriage. Then on 13/02/06<br />

the matter was settled and they were freed from child marriage.<br />

The watdog committee advised them to continue their study and on due time get married.<br />

Now it is found that Blue Akter is involved in education.<br />

Case study by : Farida Yasmin Milky<br />

Project Coordinator, LTN<br />

Background :<br />

Case Study-4<br />

Mahinur Begum lives in Labonsora village, Banaripara Upazila, Barisal. At her 15 years of<br />

age her guardians let he married in Songotkati village at Sarupkati Upazila.<br />

Incidence :<br />

Mahinur’s husband was married earlier it was not known. But he separated from his<br />

prevcious wife before marriage. After one year of marriage, Mahinur borne a beautiful<br />

daughter. After this her huband started to torture her for dowry. His previous wife liked to<br />

come again in his family. He did not pay much food to wife and daughter. The UP Chairman<br />

took initiative to settle the matter but not succeeded. After this Mahinur came back to her<br />

father’s house on torture.<br />

Role of LTN :<br />

Mahinur went to UP Member Shamim Jakia for settlement. As a member of LTN, Jakia took<br />

the victim to LTN. LTN too the victim to BLAST and BLAST issued a legal notice the<br />

husband. Her husband came on date and BLAST settled the matter and Mahinur went back<br />

to her husband. Within 15 days, turture again started to Mahinur. The husband does not give<br />

livings to the wife. After this according to the complaint , BLAST issued 2 nd notice, warning<br />

the husband that if complain would come again, the case would be filed against him and<br />

BLAST would cover all expenses for that case. On this condition, the husband took Mahinur<br />

to the house.<br />

Present Position :<br />

Now Mahinur covers her days happily with her husband.<br />

Case study by : Farida Yasmin Milky<br />

Project Coordinator, LTN<br />

55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!