05.06.2013 Views

Vo.4-Moshirnia-Final

Vo.4-Moshirnia-Final

Vo.4-Moshirnia-Final

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

403 Harvard National Security Journal / Vol. 4<br />

access a large amount of clustered suspect content, for example accessing<br />

bomb making sites, jihadi sites, and maps of military deployment. 99<br />

These techniques provide multiple avenues to predict and combat<br />

terrorism, demonstrating the importance of content rich data. OSINT, be it<br />

based on modern automated datamining or traditional human driven<br />

analysis, relies on a rich environment of open information. Chilling the<br />

production of this information thwarts these valuable efforts, which by some<br />

accounts provide the great majority of our actionable intelligence. While the<br />

popular consciousness imagines that our intelligence results from secret<br />

agents and clandestine meetings, our vital intelligence flows instead from<br />

journalists, researchers, and academics. Unfortunately, recent legal positions<br />

by the U.S. Government and decisions by the Supreme Court threaten to<br />

chill the very speech that forms the foundation of our intelligence analysis.<br />

In doing so, the decision harms our nation’s capacity for intelligence<br />

gathering and heightens the security threats we face.<br />

III. Recent Government Positions Threaten to Chill Valuable Intelligence<br />

The Government’s and the Court’s recent legal stances are intended<br />

to chill sources of open source intelligence involving terrorists themselves,<br />

foreign reporters, and domestic individuals who have had contact with<br />

foreign terror organizations. In the trial and appeal of al-Qaeda<br />

propagandist, Ali Hamza Al-Bahlul, the Government has advanced the<br />

theory that no part of the First Amendment reaches enemy aliens tried in an<br />

American courtroom. 100 The chilling effects of HLP are exacerbated by the<br />

trial of Al-Bahlul. Taking these precedents together, a future court could<br />

merge the broad definition of material support with a solicitation charge<br />

decoupled from First Amendment limitations. That is, if the Court may<br />

disregard the First Amendment in solicitation cases involving foreign<br />

combatants and in material support cases involving Americans who have<br />

associated with terrorists, the Government will be emboldened to ignore<br />

First Amendment concerns in crimes involving the solicitation of material<br />

support for terrorism. The Government has also detained and threatened<br />

99 Id.<br />

100 Reply Brief for Government/Appellee, Al Bahlul v. United States, CMCR (No. 09-001),<br />

*5 (2009), available at http://www.defense.gov/news/2%20-<br />

%20Prosecution%20Reply%20Brief%20(30%20OCT%2009)%20(58%20pages).pdf<br />

[hereinafter Bahlul Reply].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!