Vo.4-Moshirnia-Final
Vo.4-Moshirnia-Final
Vo.4-Moshirnia-Final
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
439 Harvard National Security Journal / Vol. 4<br />
speech of regional media expressing “offensive arguments.” HLP alone<br />
exacts a significant toll on nonconforming speech. Section 2339B will likely<br />
have a chilling effect on American and foreign researchers by threatening<br />
them with prison time. Worse still, the solicitation offense at issue in Bahlul,<br />
10 U.S.C. § 950, creates an expansive crime of solicitation of material<br />
support. 287 A solicitation charge, freed from any Brandenburg constraints,<br />
would encompass an even larger field of conduct for individuals labeled<br />
enemy combatants. 288<br />
Like HLP, the Government’s position in Bahlul and Al-Haj’s case<br />
unjustifiably and unnecessarily curtails free speech rights. Not only is this<br />
discussion complex and important, it is arguably the most powerful critique<br />
because it adopts the accepted values of proponents of my antipodes and<br />
shows how even they ought to favor a different approach. The material<br />
support statute, as interpreted in HLP, will limit terrorist group advocacy. It<br />
is also the explicit goal of the Government in Al-Bahlul’s trial to limit the<br />
production and distribution of al-Qaeda propaganda. The Government’s<br />
position, though intended to suppress terrorist efforts, will ultimately have a<br />
self-defeating effect because it will chill speech that has value as intelligence.<br />
09-001), available at<br />
http://www.defense.gov/news/3d%20Motion%20and%20Brief%20from%20US%20Intel<br />
ligence%2015%20Oct%2009.pdf.<br />
287 The language of 10 U.S.C. § 950v (2006) comprises 18 U.S.C. § 2339(a)–(b).<br />
288 It should be noted that Government may bring a fairly broad charge of conspiracy to<br />
provide material support only against alien unprivileged enemy belligerents. 10 U.S.C. §<br />
950v(28) (2006) (“Any person subject to this chapter who conspires to commit one or more<br />
substantive offenses triable by military commission under this chapter, . . . shall be punished<br />
. . . .”). It is not the position of this Article that § 950v will be used against citizens.<br />
However, some lawmakers have demonstrated a desire to widen the definition of enemy<br />
combatants to include U.S. citizens held within the United States in response to domestic<br />
attacks. In response to the Boston Marathon Bombing, several prominent Republican<br />
senators requested that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, a naturalized U.S. citizen, be labeled an<br />
enemy combatant. Press Release, Sen. Lindsey Graham, Graham, McCain, Ayotte and<br />
King Statement On Enemy Combatant Status For Boston Suspect (Apr. 20, 2013), available<br />
at<br />
http://www.lgraham.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.PressReleases<br />
&ContentRecord_id=283aeb5a-ffc4-7534-730b-b9df7e3a648f . The administration refused<br />
this request. See John R. Ellement, Milton J. Valencia & Martin Finucane, Dzhokhar<br />
Tsarnaev, Marathon bombing suspect, charged in federal court with using a weapon of mass destruction,<br />
BOSTON.COM, Apr. 23, 2013, http://www.boston.com/metrodesk/2013/04/22/whitehouse-dzhokhar-tsarnaev-bombing-suspect-tried-federalcourt/VvkTs5UtwmsuEnKMXMVSXM/story.html.