08.06.2013 Views

Bottom Trawl Surveys - Proceedings of a Workshop Held at Ottawa ...

Bottom Trawl Surveys - Proceedings of a Workshop Held at Ottawa ...

Bottom Trawl Surveys - Proceedings of a Workshop Held at Ottawa ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

to be exact. Monte Carlo simul<strong>at</strong>ions with<br />

artificial d<strong>at</strong>a consistent with model<br />

assumptions led to survivor estim<strong>at</strong>es<br />

distributed as expected. In practice, there is<br />

no assurance th<strong>at</strong> the assumptions underlying the<br />

model hold. Therefore, methods <strong>of</strong> detecting<br />

failure <strong>of</strong> assumptions were examined.<br />

The estim<strong>at</strong>or <strong>of</strong> survivors in Rivard's<br />

implement<strong>at</strong>ion depends on two main assumptions<br />

1. Ri (t) = Ni (t) Ki (t)<br />

where Ki(t) = exp (Ki(t))<br />

2. Var { ln Ri(t) - ln(CINTi(t) +<br />

SINTi(t))} =constant<br />

Departures from these assumptions can be<br />

(19)<br />

examined by analysis <strong>of</strong> the residuals between ln<br />

Ri(t) and ln (CINT + SINT) plus Ki• The<br />

implement<strong>at</strong>ion by Rivard (1980) carries out<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> variance by linear regression to<br />

test system<strong>at</strong>ic departures in residuals <strong>of</strong><br />

years, year-classes and ages. Should this test<br />

show no significant departure, further analysis<br />

can be carried out to determine whether the<br />

first and last age groups have higher or lower<br />

residual variances.<br />

The existing computer program<br />

highlights outliers <strong>of</strong> residuals more than two<br />

standard devi<strong>at</strong>ions from zero, and gives<br />

year-by-year, age-by-age, and year-class<br />

regression coefficients from the analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

variance. These are useful in pinpointing<br />

specific problems.<br />

EXAMPLES<br />

The theory outlined above is general<br />

and gives no indic<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> how successful the<br />

survivor method can be in practice. Precision<br />

<strong>of</strong> estim<strong>at</strong>es depends heavily on the accuracy <strong>of</strong><br />

the research vessel index <strong>of</strong> abundance. Two<br />

examples show wh<strong>at</strong> can happen in applying the<br />

method using Rivard's (1980) implement<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

The first example used d<strong>at</strong>a on<br />

Southern Gulf <strong>of</strong> St. Lawrence cod from Beacham<br />

(1980).<br />

The computer printout is appended<br />

here. Calibr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> K factors used ages 3-8<br />

and years 1970-75. It was assumed th<strong>at</strong> K was<br />

constant for ages 6-12.<br />

Five iter<strong>at</strong>ions were required to<br />

estim<strong>at</strong>e the K factors. The importance <strong>of</strong><br />

integr<strong>at</strong>ed survivors in the popul<strong>at</strong>ion number<br />

estim<strong>at</strong>es is an analogous to the sensitivity <strong>of</strong><br />

cohort analysis to "terminal F". Due to high<br />

fishing mortality r<strong>at</strong>es in the early 1970s,<br />

survivors <strong>of</strong> the 64-68 year-classes <strong>at</strong> age 6<br />

represent 10% or less <strong>of</strong> the estim<strong>at</strong>ed stock<br />

size <strong>at</strong> age 6. L<strong>at</strong>er year-classes were exposed<br />

to less cumul<strong>at</strong>ive fishing mortality and<br />

therefore their integr<strong>at</strong>ed survivors represent<br />

up to 40% <strong>of</strong> estim<strong>at</strong>ed popul<strong>at</strong>ion size in the<br />

calibr<strong>at</strong>ion years and ages. This corresponds to<br />

169<br />

the usual uncertainty <strong>of</strong> cohort analysis<br />

popul<strong>at</strong>ion estim<strong>at</strong>es for the most recent years.<br />

The Tables entitled "Estim<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

Survivors" and "Estim<strong>at</strong>ed variances <strong>of</strong><br />

survivors" are useful in determining the impact<br />

<strong>of</strong> particular years and ages on the survivor<br />

estim<strong>at</strong>es and the "weighted survivors" Table<br />

shows the contributions <strong>of</strong> each age-year<br />

combin<strong>at</strong>ion to the weighted survivor estim<strong>at</strong>e.<br />

Notice th<strong>at</strong> surveys from as early as 1974<br />

contribute up to 5% to the 1979 survivor<br />

estim<strong>at</strong>es. In this example, estim<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

coefficients <strong>of</strong> vari<strong>at</strong>ion (c.v.) for survivors<br />

<strong>at</strong> the end <strong>of</strong> 1979 vary from 16 to 22%.<br />

The analysis <strong>of</strong> variance <strong>of</strong> residuals<br />

indic<strong>at</strong>es a year effect which would occur<br />

spuriously with less than 10% probability.<br />

Examin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> year coefficients shows a 1971<br />

coefficient with a nominally significant "t"<br />

st<strong>at</strong>istic <strong>of</strong> -2.56 indic<strong>at</strong>ing lower than usual<br />

availability <strong>of</strong> cod to the survey. The<br />

remaining coefficients are not large in absolute<br />

value. 1971 d<strong>at</strong>a has very little effect on 1979<br />

survivors so th<strong>at</strong> no serious viol<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong><br />

assumptions are indic<strong>at</strong>ed by the analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

variance.<br />

Examin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> residuals shows no<br />

serious outliers in 1977-79 but there are<br />

positive residuals <strong>of</strong> 0.24 to 0.49 for ages 4-7<br />

in 1979. These influence the "Estim<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

Survivors" Table, causing the 1979 estim<strong>at</strong>es for<br />

these year-classes to be higher than those for<br />

1977-78. While the residuals are not large<br />

enough to be st<strong>at</strong>istically significant, the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> an availability change to the survey<br />

gear in 1979 cannot be ruled out. If it were<br />

present, the survivors for 1979 would be<br />

overestim<strong>at</strong>ed.<br />

The second example uses d<strong>at</strong>a from<br />

O'Boyle (1980) for haddock in NAFO division 4X.<br />

The survivor method is applied only to u.s. fall<br />

groundfish survey d<strong>at</strong>a. The computer listing is<br />

appended.<br />

The most striking departure from the<br />

previous example is the extremely high<br />

calcul<strong>at</strong>ed coefficient <strong>of</strong> vari<strong>at</strong>ion (over 150%)<br />

<strong>of</strong> survivor estim<strong>at</strong>es for 1978. The reason is<br />

clearly the highly variable research vessel<br />

abundance index which shows some neg<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

cross-year mortality estim<strong>at</strong>es. The residual<br />

vari<strong>at</strong>ion is so high (2.43 on a logarithmic<br />

scale) th<strong>at</strong> a large change in availability to<br />

the survey in 1977 (year effect 0.702 on a<br />

logarithmic scale) is far from being<br />

st<strong>at</strong>istically significant.<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> this example suggest<br />

th<strong>at</strong> this survey abundance index is inadequ<strong>at</strong>e<br />

for quantit<strong>at</strong>ive estim<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> survivors.<br />

Despite this, qualit<strong>at</strong>ively, the results are<br />

similar to those <strong>of</strong> O'Boyle which utilize other<br />

abundance indices as well.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!