Bottom Trawl Surveys - Proceedings of a Workshop Held at Ottawa ...
Bottom Trawl Surveys - Proceedings of a Workshop Held at Ottawa ...
Bottom Trawl Surveys - Proceedings of a Workshop Held at Ottawa ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
to be exact. Monte Carlo simul<strong>at</strong>ions with<br />
artificial d<strong>at</strong>a consistent with model<br />
assumptions led to survivor estim<strong>at</strong>es<br />
distributed as expected. In practice, there is<br />
no assurance th<strong>at</strong> the assumptions underlying the<br />
model hold. Therefore, methods <strong>of</strong> detecting<br />
failure <strong>of</strong> assumptions were examined.<br />
The estim<strong>at</strong>or <strong>of</strong> survivors in Rivard's<br />
implement<strong>at</strong>ion depends on two main assumptions<br />
1. Ri (t) = Ni (t) Ki (t)<br />
where Ki(t) = exp (Ki(t))<br />
2. Var { ln Ri(t) - ln(CINTi(t) +<br />
SINTi(t))} =constant<br />
Departures from these assumptions can be<br />
(19)<br />
examined by analysis <strong>of</strong> the residuals between ln<br />
Ri(t) and ln (CINT + SINT) plus Ki• The<br />
implement<strong>at</strong>ion by Rivard (1980) carries out<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> variance by linear regression to<br />
test system<strong>at</strong>ic departures in residuals <strong>of</strong><br />
years, year-classes and ages. Should this test<br />
show no significant departure, further analysis<br />
can be carried out to determine whether the<br />
first and last age groups have higher or lower<br />
residual variances.<br />
The existing computer program<br />
highlights outliers <strong>of</strong> residuals more than two<br />
standard devi<strong>at</strong>ions from zero, and gives<br />
year-by-year, age-by-age, and year-class<br />
regression coefficients from the analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
variance. These are useful in pinpointing<br />
specific problems.<br />
EXAMPLES<br />
The theory outlined above is general<br />
and gives no indic<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> how successful the<br />
survivor method can be in practice. Precision<br />
<strong>of</strong> estim<strong>at</strong>es depends heavily on the accuracy <strong>of</strong><br />
the research vessel index <strong>of</strong> abundance. Two<br />
examples show wh<strong>at</strong> can happen in applying the<br />
method using Rivard's (1980) implement<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />
The first example used d<strong>at</strong>a on<br />
Southern Gulf <strong>of</strong> St. Lawrence cod from Beacham<br />
(1980).<br />
The computer printout is appended<br />
here. Calibr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> K factors used ages 3-8<br />
and years 1970-75. It was assumed th<strong>at</strong> K was<br />
constant for ages 6-12.<br />
Five iter<strong>at</strong>ions were required to<br />
estim<strong>at</strong>e the K factors. The importance <strong>of</strong><br />
integr<strong>at</strong>ed survivors in the popul<strong>at</strong>ion number<br />
estim<strong>at</strong>es is an analogous to the sensitivity <strong>of</strong><br />
cohort analysis to "terminal F". Due to high<br />
fishing mortality r<strong>at</strong>es in the early 1970s,<br />
survivors <strong>of</strong> the 64-68 year-classes <strong>at</strong> age 6<br />
represent 10% or less <strong>of</strong> the estim<strong>at</strong>ed stock<br />
size <strong>at</strong> age 6. L<strong>at</strong>er year-classes were exposed<br />
to less cumul<strong>at</strong>ive fishing mortality and<br />
therefore their integr<strong>at</strong>ed survivors represent<br />
up to 40% <strong>of</strong> estim<strong>at</strong>ed popul<strong>at</strong>ion size in the<br />
calibr<strong>at</strong>ion years and ages. This corresponds to<br />
169<br />
the usual uncertainty <strong>of</strong> cohort analysis<br />
popul<strong>at</strong>ion estim<strong>at</strong>es for the most recent years.<br />
The Tables entitled "Estim<strong>at</strong>ed<br />
Survivors" and "Estim<strong>at</strong>ed variances <strong>of</strong><br />
survivors" are useful in determining the impact<br />
<strong>of</strong> particular years and ages on the survivor<br />
estim<strong>at</strong>es and the "weighted survivors" Table<br />
shows the contributions <strong>of</strong> each age-year<br />
combin<strong>at</strong>ion to the weighted survivor estim<strong>at</strong>e.<br />
Notice th<strong>at</strong> surveys from as early as 1974<br />
contribute up to 5% to the 1979 survivor<br />
estim<strong>at</strong>es. In this example, estim<strong>at</strong>ed<br />
coefficients <strong>of</strong> vari<strong>at</strong>ion (c.v.) for survivors<br />
<strong>at</strong> the end <strong>of</strong> 1979 vary from 16 to 22%.<br />
The analysis <strong>of</strong> variance <strong>of</strong> residuals<br />
indic<strong>at</strong>es a year effect which would occur<br />
spuriously with less than 10% probability.<br />
Examin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> year coefficients shows a 1971<br />
coefficient with a nominally significant "t"<br />
st<strong>at</strong>istic <strong>of</strong> -2.56 indic<strong>at</strong>ing lower than usual<br />
availability <strong>of</strong> cod to the survey. The<br />
remaining coefficients are not large in absolute<br />
value. 1971 d<strong>at</strong>a has very little effect on 1979<br />
survivors so th<strong>at</strong> no serious viol<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong><br />
assumptions are indic<strong>at</strong>ed by the analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
variance.<br />
Examin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> residuals shows no<br />
serious outliers in 1977-79 but there are<br />
positive residuals <strong>of</strong> 0.24 to 0.49 for ages 4-7<br />
in 1979. These influence the "Estim<strong>at</strong>ed<br />
Survivors" Table, causing the 1979 estim<strong>at</strong>es for<br />
these year-classes to be higher than those for<br />
1977-78. While the residuals are not large<br />
enough to be st<strong>at</strong>istically significant, the<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> an availability change to the survey<br />
gear in 1979 cannot be ruled out. If it were<br />
present, the survivors for 1979 would be<br />
overestim<strong>at</strong>ed.<br />
The second example uses d<strong>at</strong>a from<br />
O'Boyle (1980) for haddock in NAFO division 4X.<br />
The survivor method is applied only to u.s. fall<br />
groundfish survey d<strong>at</strong>a. The computer listing is<br />
appended.<br />
The most striking departure from the<br />
previous example is the extremely high<br />
calcul<strong>at</strong>ed coefficient <strong>of</strong> vari<strong>at</strong>ion (over 150%)<br />
<strong>of</strong> survivor estim<strong>at</strong>es for 1978. The reason is<br />
clearly the highly variable research vessel<br />
abundance index which shows some neg<strong>at</strong>ive<br />
cross-year mortality estim<strong>at</strong>es. The residual<br />
vari<strong>at</strong>ion is so high (2.43 on a logarithmic<br />
scale) th<strong>at</strong> a large change in availability to<br />
the survey in 1977 (year effect 0.702 on a<br />
logarithmic scale) is far from being<br />
st<strong>at</strong>istically significant.<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> this example suggest<br />
th<strong>at</strong> this survey abundance index is inadequ<strong>at</strong>e<br />
for quantit<strong>at</strong>ive estim<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> survivors.<br />
Despite this, qualit<strong>at</strong>ively, the results are<br />
similar to those <strong>of</strong> O'Boyle which utilize other<br />
abundance indices as well.