19.06.2013 Views

THE STRONG PERFECTS IN THE ROMANCE ... - Page ON

THE STRONG PERFECTS IN THE ROMANCE ... - Page ON

THE STRONG PERFECTS IN THE ROMANCE ... - Page ON

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Besides this group of verbs in which -vi was added to a long<br />

vowel, there was another group, the one with which we are here<br />

concerned, in which -ui is found added to a consonant. In origin, this<br />

-ui seems to have been the same as the -vi of nōvi, -plēvi etc., but<br />

whereas in the above cases the -w- element was added to a<br />

monosyllabic stem with a long vowel, in this case it was added to<br />

disyllabic stems ending in a short vowel. Thus the -ui of the perfects<br />

secui, domui, habui, tacui comes from *-ə-wai (with IE reduced grade<br />

of the root), just as the -(ĭ)tus of the participles comes from *-ə-tos.<br />

Though I can find no parallels to this quoted from other languages, it<br />

seems reasonable to me to suppose that this -w- was added in the<br />

same way to forms 1 and 3 of the perfect, especially when we consider<br />

that -plē(v)-, (g)nō(v)-, strā(v)-, trī(v)-, fū(v)- are originally disyllabic<br />

stems (Buck, §§126-7), and that the stem of the imperfectum of this<br />

second group of verbs often ends in a long vowel (IE strong grade of<br />

the root), as secā-, domā-, habē-, tacē-. As we have just seen, some or<br />

all of the -vi perfects from roots ending in -v-, such as mōvi, iūvi, lāvi,<br />

probably belong here, though they can also be explained in the same<br />

way as cāvi above; if they go back to forms like *mowə-wai, or were<br />

formed at a later stage by adding -ui (extracted from sec-ui, dom-ui<br />

etc.) to the root, then they are to be analysed as mov-vi, iuv-vi, lav-vi.<br />

(Forms in -ui among the -āre verbs, like secui, domui, disappeared,<br />

though fossilised traces of the corresponding participles in -ĭtus<br />

remained; see my previous paper.) Lavā- is clearly a disyllabic stem<br />

(cf. Gk. ló(w)e-ssa), and because of this Burger, as quoted approvingly<br />

by Bonfante, says lāvisti, mōvisti should be divided lāvi-sti, mōvi-sti,<br />

but such disyllabic stems with a long vowel in the first syllable cannot<br />

be traced back to IE, so I prefer the *-ə-wai interpretation. In this case<br />

the first vowels of lāvi and mōvi would only be what is commonly<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!